Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 6/29/19

U.S. Policy on Immigrant Children Violates the Convention on the Rights of the Child?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     (# of views)   1 comment
Author 82169
Message Cesar Chelala

From Counterpunch

- Advertisement -
A Salvadoran father and daughter who drowned while attempting to seek asylum in the United States are the latest victims of a policy that has cost the lives and seriously affected the health of hundreds of people, most of them children. Children have been separated from their parents and kept in steel cages, a brutal aggression against those most vulnerable.

The mistreatment of children and the separation from their parents violates basic tenets of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), an internationally recognized agreement that establishes a comprehensive set of goals for individual nations to improve children's lives.

Although the convention has worldwide recognition and support, the U.S. is the only country in the world that hasn't yet ratified the CRC. Both the Ronald Reagan and the George H.W. Bush administrations played an important role in drafting the treaty, which was signed by the US government in 1995, indicating the nation's intent to consider ratification.

The next step, so far unfulfilled by the US, is for the President and his advisers to draft a Statement of Reservations, Understandings, and Declarations to be presented to the Senate for its "advice and consent." Upon Senate approval by a two-thirds majority, the treaty goes back to the President for ratification.

- Advertisement -

The Convention calls for children to be free from violence and abuse, and compels governments to provide them adequate nutrition and health care. It also demands that children receive equal treatment regardless of gender, race or cultural background, and have the right to express their opinions and have freedom of thought in matters affecting them. Further, it addresses the rights of children with disabilities.

In addition, the CRC emphasizes the primacy and importance of the role, authority, and responsibility of parents and family and is consistent with the principles contained in the U.S. Bill of Rights. Ratification of the convention has been endorsed by about a hundred organizations in the US, among them the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Baptist Churches, the American Bar Association, the National Education Association, and the Child Welfare League of America.

Given this level of endorsements, why hasn't the U.S. ratified the CRC? The convention has found a notable degree of opposition within the Senate and in the public, in part from a number of religious groups, as well as among those who claim it conflicts with the US Constitution.

- Advertisement -

Several among these have portrayed the Convention as a threat to national sovereignty, states' rights, the child-parent relationship, and parental rights. However, Lawrence S. Wittner, a Professor of History emeritus at the State University of New York (SUNY) at Albany has indicated that although some current US laws clash with the Convention's child protection features, most US laws are in line with the Convention.

Regarding the claim that the Convention can override the US Constitution, the Supremacy Law of that Constitution establishes no treaty can override it. In addition, the Convention does not grant any international body enforcement authority over the US or its citizens, but only obligates the parties to the Convention to submit periodic reports regarding progress on the provisions of the treaty.

The Trump administration policy on immigrant children not only does a disservice to children trying to come into the U.S. It hurts the reputation of the U.S. and its system of justice in the world.

 

- Advertisement -

Rate It | View Ratings

Cesar Chelala Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ce'sar Chelala
Global Health Consultant & Contributing Editor, The Globalist





Ce'sar Chelala is the global health consultant and a contributing editor for The Globalist.

Since 1980, he (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Policy on Immigrant Children Violates the Convention on the Rights of the Child?

Trump's Decision on Iran Deal Spells Disaster for the Middle East

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


KurtB

Become a Fan
Author 84481

(Member since Dec 9, 2012), 3 fans, 803 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Oscar Ramirez and his daughter would be alive today if the wall had been built.

The people swarming our southern border may have been 'refugees' when they crossed Mexico's southern border, but they became economic migrants when they continued on to our border looking for a 'better deal'.

Submitted on Sunday, Jun 30, 2019 at 4:08:12 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment