Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Trump's trade tariffs, a "fool's errand" that won't work, and will backfire

By       Message Michael Payne       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   7 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 10/19/18

Author 23439
Become a Fan
  (81 fans)
- Advertisement -

From flickr.com: Trump launches trade war with China | -degreesŸ - Stock Photos / Foto | Flickr1024 Ã-- 752 - 175k -
Trump launches trade war with China | . Stock Photos / Foto. | Flickr1024 -- 752 - 175k - jpg
(Image by flickr.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Someone should have told Trump that the one thing he must never even consider doing is to start an economic war with China. Unfortunately, that's what this president, an economic lightweight, recently did.

This is not yet a trade war but it could easily evolve into one. In such a war does China have the weaponry to fight back against the U.S. tariffs that Trump initiated?. You bet it does, more than one might think. So let's talk about some of this weaponry.

- Advertisement -

China has a very large, growing economy powered by a huge manufacturing sector, the largest in the world, one that the U.S. once operated until American companies decided that they could generate much greater profits by replacing American workers with those in China. So they transferred the bulk of their manufacturing to China.

It's difficult to determine what the average hourly wage of Chinese workers is because wages across this huge country vary so very much. By reviewing the typical wages in the largest manufacturing sectors such as Beijing, we find that they are somewhere between $2.20 and $3.60 per hour. They have been increasing in recent years.

Compare that to the $7.25 per hour minimum wage in the U.S and the fact that wages for jobs in what's left of the U.S. manufacturing sector are much higher. Also, we will soon be seeing U.S. companies following Amazon's recent move to adopt a minimum wage of $15.00 per hour.

- Advertisement -

So how in the world does Trump think U.S. companies are going to be able to compete with Chinese manufacturers?

On July 31 of this year, Trump said that U.S. Steel was opening six new steel mills but that company has not verified it. It has shown no intention of doing so at this time. Why would it spend many billions on new mills when it knows it cannot compete with China in the production of steel?

Will these Trump tariffs hurt China and adversely affect its economy? Without question, they will to a certain extent and it's a dilemma for that country. But, as we know, the Chinese have so much economic power that they can absorb a lot of hits to their economy if need be and then bounce back.

Why are these tariffs going to backfire? They are actually a tax on Chinese products coming into America and are going to hurt many American companies and consumers. Are consumers going to stop buying much higher priced Chinese products such as cell phones, TV's, computers, and other electronic products that the U.S. no longer makes? No, but they certainly will cut back their purchases.

Prices on a myriad of imported products are rapidly increasing. Prices of steel, used on a multitude of products, are skyrocketing. Auto industry analysts are reporting that we could see the prices of autos increase by $8,000. When you buy a washer or dryer in the near future you will pay a lot more.

Harley Davidson is moving some of its production to Europe, and other U.S. companies are contemplating doing the same.

- Advertisement -

China is retaliating against U.S. tariffs by slapping their own tariffs on American imports, and farmers in this country are seeing Brazil, Canada, Argentina, and Russia shipping more and more soybeans, corn, and wheat to China. The relationships farmers have built with China are rapidly eroding.

China could retaliate in other ways. For example, it could devalue its currency to make their exports less expensive. That would create turmoil in the financial sectors and also negate these tariffs somewhat.

If China gets to the point of no return would it actually consider selling off some of its holdings of U.S. securities? This would be a last resort for it but when it's economy takes a massive hit because of the tariffs anything can happen. And such a move would prove to be disastrous for the U.S.

Why exactly? So far this year, the federal government has paid more than $455.6 billion in interest on its national debt. It paid $458.5 billion in interest on the debt last fiscal year. When the figures for August 2018 interest payments are calculated, the government will have spent more on interest in fiscal year 2018 than all of fiscal year 2017.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Michael Payne is an independent, progressive activist. His writings deal with social, economic, political and foreign policy issues. He is a featured writer on Opednews and Nation of Change and his articles have appeared on many other websites (more...)
 

Michael Payne Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Orwell's "1984" becoming a reality in modern-day America

Heed the Warning Signs; America is Edging Ever Closer to a Societal Implosion

Ethics and Morals in America; an Endangered Species

How Do You Spell Sociopath? G-O-P

The Beginning of the End for the U.S. Dollar as the World Reserve Currency

A U.S. President Defies Congress, the Constitution and the Will of the People; Will Impeachment Follow?

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 7 comments


Michael Payne

Become a Fan
Author 23439

(Member since Oct 2, 2008), 81 fans, 464 articles, 2423 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

None of this had to happen. Trump did not have to resort to tariffs. All he needed to do was make it very clear to Chinese leaders that there had to be significant changes made to the trade relationship because of its great importance to both countries. And that America would not take no for an answer. That would not have been easy but he didn't even pursue it.

It's called using negotiation to work out problems, nations working together to solve them; something that Trump does not know how to do. So all we need to do is to just wait a while and watch as the backfire on tariffs takes place.

Submitted on Friday, Oct 19, 2018 at 4:04:12 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 

shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282

(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 23 fans, 45 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2118 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

What if the Chinese had said no to making any changes in their trade practices?

Do you support the strengthening of US and the west's global financial hegemony which is enforced by the US and NATO military?

If yes, how does causing the planet's number 2 and 3 military powers to unite in order to create a non petrodollar financial settlement system, strengthen the west and helps it to maintain a unipolar world?

Submitted on Friday, Oct 19, 2018 at 7:39:35 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (2+)
Help
 
Indent

Michael Payne

Become a Fan
Author 23439

(Member since Oct 2, 2008), 81 fans, 464 articles, 2423 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to shad williams:   New Content

If they said no who knows what the US would do? In major negotiations it is common for one side or the other to say no and that's part of the negotiations. If they wouldn't cooperate then I would look at heavy sanctions or some other form of punishment but I would only use tariffs as the very last resort,

We created this situation of the trade deficit, we did it to ourselves when greedy US companies gave away almost our entire manufacturing sector to China and threw our workers under the bus. Now we are paying the price and about to start a trade war we can't win.

Second point - no. And as far as using the military to do it absolutely no. I would only use the military for defending America against real threats and never for that or the stupid Vietnam, Iraq, and Afghan wars that have cost us many trillions and were not at all justified.

Good comments by you. I'd like to see more like that.


Submitted on Friday, Oct 19, 2018 at 10:11:29 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282

(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 23 fans, 45 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2118 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Michael Payne:   New Content

I must have been off my meds again.

Submitted on Thursday, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:23:53 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Cas

Become a Fan
Author 89699

(Member since Aug 31, 2013), 1 fan, 56 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Trump...the Accidental Destroyer.

Submitted on Saturday, Oct 20, 2018 at 12:44:16 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Michael Payne

Become a Fan
Author 23439

(Member since Oct 2, 2008), 81 fans, 464 articles, 2423 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Cas:   New Content

Or we could say, the deliberate destroyer. Here's a guy that loves to watch journalists get body slammed. The man is lower than a snake and he has a lot of people in this country who worship him. What does that say about ethics and morals in America? Disgusting, repulsive.

Submitted on Saturday, Oct 20, 2018 at 1:18:42 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

shad williams

Become a Fan
Author 63282

(Member since Apr 13, 2011), 23 fans, 45 articles, 1 quicklinks, 2118 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Michael Payne:   New Content

The consequences of his foreign policy are wonderfully multi faceted in the wake of the damages he is conveying. Too bad we are unorganized to take advantage of what could have been a useful diversion.

Submitted on Thursday, Nov 1, 2018 at 12:20:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment