Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 8 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 2/11/17

Trump's terror policies are bad enough now. What about after an attack?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
(# of views)   2 comments
Author 87840
Message Trevor Timm
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)

From The Guardian

Donald Trump
Copyrighted Image? DMCA

Donald Trump has spent the bulk of his new presidency playing tough in the face of terrorism. Yet pretty much everything he's proposed, beyond being bigoted in the extreme, shows just how terrified and weak he is -- all while putting the country at greater risk.

This week, Trump spent much of his time claiming -- falsely -- that the media downplays terrorist attacks for "reasons" he did not explain. "It's gotten to a point where it's not even being reported," he proclaimed at a military event on Tuesday. "And in many cases, the very, very dishonest press doesn't want to report it. They have their reasons, and you understand that." The White House followed up with a list of 73 terror attacks over the past few years which they claimed were "under-covered."

The idea that the media downplays terror attacks is hard to fathom. For 15 years, terror attacks -- and countless terror threats that never materialized -- have led to wall-to-wall coverage on television, in print and online. Many times such coverage has led politicians to implement disturbing policies that would have done nothing to prevent the attacks in the first place and only further restrict the rights of millions of innocent people.

The numbers back up just how undeniably wrong Trump's claims are: Peter Bergen at CNN calculated that the 78 terrorist attacks the White House claimed were "under-reported" were the subject of 80,000 articles. 80,000!

But what makes Trump's uneducated musing even more infuriating is that at the same time as he instills fear into the American people about Islamist terrorism -- which only does the terrorists' job for them -- he's going out of his way to create a blind spot inside the US government for an arguably greater threat: terrorism committed by white nationalist, far-right groups.

According to Reuters, Trump wants to change the name of the Department of Homeland Security's "Countering Violent Extremism" program to "Countering Radical Islamic Extremism." Under this plan, violent white supremacists would no longer be targeted. Meanwhile, his "list" of 78 terror attacks that the White House released this week contained exactly zero white supremacist incidents.

Click Here to Read Whole Article

 

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

Trevor Timm Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Trevor Timm is a co-founder and the executive director of the Freedom of the Press Foundation. He is a writer, activist, and lawyer who specializes in free speech and government transparency issues. He has contributed to  The (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Sen. Dianne Feinstein's New NSA Bill Will Codify and Extend Mass Surveillance of Americans

Everyone loves Bernie Sanders. Except, it seems, the Democratic party

DOJ Investigation of AP Part of Larger Pattern to Intimidate Sources and Reporters

Why the Panama Papers should be a US election issue

If Trump leaks are OK and Clinton leaks aren't, there's a problem

One good thing about Donald Trump's campaign: it's ruining Jeb Bush's

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: