"Those who do not
remember the past are condemned to repeat it." -George Santayana
The final goal of capitalism is clear: concentration of capital leads to a caste
of "chosen by God" loafers, with unlimited possibilities, who use all
others only as work horses. But the enormous quantity of
"unnecessary" people demands expensive social conditions, creates
environmental problems, and even traffic jams. And it is also socially highly
explosive. So how do they get rid of wasted humans since machines have totally
replaced them? Male sterilization? Step-by-step degeneration through unhealthy
genetically modified food sold to the people via powerful advertising? Entrapment
in local wars? Or Hitler-style death camps?
"We must aggravate the inequality
between people by putting impenetrable barriers. There will be the class of
masters and " below them there will be anonymous mob, the lowest ones
forever. Still further down, there will be the defeated foreigner modern
slaves. And above all these will rise a new aristocratic class of which I can
say nothing yet." - Adolf Hitler
But can it make sense for mankind to reject capitalism and money as a source of
fraud, false superiority and oppression of one biological individual by another
after the example of "communist" Pol Pot in Cambodia? Six-times criminal Joseph
Dzhugashvili (Stalin) had right away understood what possibilities the MONOPOLY
of a new "sheep's religion" called "communism" opens for the
Power maniacs: "The Great Helmsman" Mao, "Master of House"
Stalin; enthusiasm through eternal poverty, and millions of people deemed
"enemies of the People", annihilated clerisy of a nation -
intellectual threat for newly brought to light
"messiahs" "
"Communist" tin
gods - emperors were the guardian angels of people's expectations? Or illusions?
- E. Sevrus
Whose egoism is humane?
The common man will remain an abandoned and defenseless orphan under the
uncontrollable domination of ANY caste of "god-like" rulers: whether
they call themselves capitalists or communists. As long as the interests of the
voter, namely pursuit of his or her voice in politics, are not will become a
strongest motivation in the competition for survival through several
independent parties in the united government. And as long as these parties will
not have gain the sympathy of voters through honest work done solely on their
behalf and without right of deceptive promises and false advertising in next
elections.
That is why in the political coup of 1991 the deceived and pauperized Russian
people turned away from the communist "Fathers of the Nation", who
had torn away the "umbilical cord" of voter feedback. The dinner
party called "The Victory of Communism" had turned out inevitably to be only
for the elite of "unselfish fighters".
"The only thing we learn from
history is that we never learn from history." - Hegel
Lenin's errors (and not only his):
1. Monopoly of one political idea leads to inevitable formation of a caste
which serves it, to the cult of "The Supreme priest"and to alienation from
the rest of the society. The caste pursues the interests of the caste
exclusively.
2. The monopoly idea creates an imbalance in that society and retention of its
domination demands regular disinformation (the lie) and physical violence in
Soviet Russia, such as Kronstadt, GULAG, Novocherkassk-62, Prague-68, the Iron
Curtain.
3. Self-preservation of a monopoly and social privileges of "priests"
require the suppression of new ideas; The lack of renewal and of healthy
rivalry leads to degeneration.
4. The unipolarity of control in autocracies leaves the possibility for shadow
protectionism; the corruption destroys the state from within.
5. The traditional pyramid of power is too dependent on the personal qualities
and political orientation of the leader and his "cheerleading group":
in Soviet Russia, from authoritarian Stalin, who built a socialist superstate
on criminal rules, to improvident, idle talker Gorbachev, who betrayed the
fates of millions by one weak-willed phrase to the kulak werewolf and drunkard
Yeltsin. That this pyramid is unstable and vulnerable is proved by that!
6. A new society begins with the reform of power. Lenin was to have bequeathed
not a successor, but an innovation in management: "the development
spiral" falls down to an anachronistic level without new mechanisms of
management. So Russia returned to the monarchic National Emblem, a
double-headed clownish mockery of modern Russian "democracy".
Political takeovers and social cataclysms will occur as long as the egoism of one dominant point of view continues to strengthen the paranoia of a suppressed opposition through its arbitrariness or indifferent inactivity and pompous lack of talent. Today's Russian marauders-swindlers were hatched out of the "moss-covered" taboos and "bedsores"of the communist Monopoly.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).