Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 22 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts   

Third American Constitution - Direct Democracy

Message Daniel Penisten
Become a Fan
  (15 fans)
Direct Democracy Emblem
Direct Democracy Emblem
(Image by Daniel Penisten)
  Details   DMCA

Constitution Of The Direct Democracy United States Of America

(An American Citizen Proposal of a Possibility For Our Third Constitution)


What if? What "IF", we the American people, suddenly became aware of our potentials and possibilities, as a good nation-building people? Became imbued with a new sense of our worth and our power? Finally understood we had a better destiny than the sordid and overly selfish path we now trod? What if it was really true that America would lead Earth's humanity to a wonderful era of light and life?

We have already done some of this, but have slipped into error. Other nations have envied us our power, even though it is abused by us, and have emulated us. We have led, but not nearly as benignly and rightly as we could.

Indulge my hopeful American notion as I attempt to build a humble ideological path that will one day become the guide for a mighty human highway to truth, goodness and fairness to as many as would. But understand that there are other efforts of this nature; other men and women who feel this need for fundamental governance change for the better.

Stepping away from the tumultuous currents and turbulence of the present mainstream of life, I have found a quiet pool in which I will make the humble attempt to start building a new ideological fabric from which we can forge a new and better American nation. I will submit this "work" as I develop its parts.

It is felt and thought, by some American citizens, that the second document, of a Constitution of the United States of America, has gradually become less serviceable to the 99%, or so, of the American populace and should be replaced by a "better" document" just as this "Second American Constitution" replaced the "First National Constitution", or the "Articles of Confederation".

This is intended to be a "better" social contract that, as accurately as possible, states our collective position as a sovereign people, of our sovereign states and nation, in our Own Times.

The "Second Constitution" hinted in its "Article V" that "Amendments" might become something that need to be done by us.

To my way of thinking, amendments are like band-aids; they are quick fixes, but begin to make the original document look kind of tacky/unkempt like an old flag; torn, frayed and faded. I understand that this very "weathered" quality is deemed by many to be a thing of beauty's tested and tried thing that deserves preservation as is.

And I agree with this sentiment, this reluctance to do without the service of this venerable social contract, that did the best it could for us, as it was.

But I wonder. Why don't We retire this old and honored document, of our hard-won beginnings and replace it with a superior document, that reflects our evolution, as a progressive nation, toward a perceived destiny that makes the old American dream "pale" by comparison. A new document, that imbeds and assigns a foundational role to, the "best" of the old one in a more "powerful" and expansive manifestation of many good minds and "hearts", that leads the way to greater happiness for far more citizens than ever before. The height of the good worker/middle class decades of the 1950s was a mere "miragic" foretelling of this splendid potential, and we don't have to fight a world war to get it.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Daniel Penisten Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

"White" male. 70 years old. Politically an eclectic, (confused?) mix of Conservative and Progressive. Have a dislike for capitalism, as it is practiced in the United States and as it is used to promote the tyranny of the new world order. (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Direct Democracy - Bill Of Rights - Article 5 - Legal Rights and Responsibilities

Article 16 - New Bill of Rights and Responsibilities

Third American Constitution - Direct Democracy - Installment 10 - Article 1 - Section 3 - Items 1 thru 10

TPP Agreement - Part 2 - Chapter 1 - Initial Provisions and General Definitions

Third American Constitution - Direct Democracy - Installment 4 Article 1 - Section 2 -- Items Three, Four and Five

Third American Constitution - Direct Democracy - Installment 6 - Article 1 - Section 2 -- Items 9,10,11

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend