Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 32 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 8/12/10

There are no liberals

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   7 comments
Message Ed Martin
Some truisms. There can't be a left without a right. There can't be a liberal without a conservative. There can't be a positive without a negative. There can't be a south without a north.

The Becks, Hannitys, Limbaughs, O'Reillys, all self-defined Republican conservatives, have defined us as liberal/progressives. Does it make sense to you to allow people who haven't been right about anything to define for you who you are? Of course not.

The position we must take is that the principles of what is called liberalism/progressivism are the default position of all humanity.

We must make it clear that we are the ones who represent the most basic human qualities of cooperation, respect, decency and the promotion of the general welfare of humanity. By the way, that is the law of the land.

So, according to my truisms, if there are no liberals, there can be no conservatives. That's right, there are no liberals and there is no such thing as a liberal ideology, but there is what the conservatives call a conservative ideology. On examination, that so called ideology proves to be a set of delusions brought about by an intellectual deficiency that fails to recognize what the history if humans has been about. That is progress toward the betterment of humans. That's the default position that we occupy. It's quite ordinary.

If there is no left and no right, then what is the division all about? A division, the so called divide between left and right, implies an equal separation into two parts. This is by no means what we have here. We have the mass of humanity who are for the same things we are for and then we have the Republicans/conservatives way out there, not on the fringe, but beyond the fringe. They are not even close to the edge, much less the center. They are literally eccentric.

In Rob Kall's article, he says, "But, we need to find a way to get organized, find discipline---" Exactly right. But, what do we call ourselves if we are in the default position. The Republicans have made (to them) the term liberal a pejorative term. Even if it were, which it isn't, it still doesn't describe us.

We must take the position that we are the default position, and that that position is neither liberal nor conservative. We are just ordinary folks. We might call it the OFP, the Ordinary Folks Party. Or the Ordinary Folks Organization. You can probably come up with something better. I don't think the White House would want to be talking insultingly about ordinary folks. That they're on drugs, crazy. That would piss off ordinary folks, which they don't want to do.

By defining ourselves by what we are, we take away their ability to speak condescendingly, disdainfully, insultingly about us. After all, it's bad politics to go around insulting ordinary folks.

Let's quit defining ourselves by any extreme position, either left or right. I'm much, much more than only the opposite of a Republican. It doesn't take much to be that. The smallest little dab of humanity will do it. That's faint praise, indeed.

So, what do we do about the Republicans/conservatives? If the people mentioned above, Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh, O'Reilly, and the others such as Sharron Angle, Michelle Bachman, Ann Coulter, and other Republican members of Congress were brought before a competent psychiatric board, and asked to explain their beliefs, they would be found to be profoundly delusional and locked up in an institution for their own safety and the safety of others.

I saw an article the other day about the fifteen best selling books of all time. With one exception, a dictionary of Chinese terms, all of them were about fantasy. One was the delusional, fantasstic ravings of the guy who became dictator of China, who was proved wrong on every count by subsequent events. Others were stories about fantastic beings who create worlds with the snap of the finger, and self anointed misogynistic prophets who speak directly to supernatural beings, and stories about precocious nerds who dabble in the supernatural. That's what people most want to read. Fantasy.

No wonder there are still Republicans in Congress.

Well Said 2   Interesting 2   Must Read 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ed Martin Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ed Martin is an ordinary person who is recovering from being badly over-educated. Born in the middle of the Great Depression, he is not affiliated with nor a member of any political, social or religious organization. He is especially interested in (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Conyers' year of tolerating contempt

The twelve powers of a President.

Removal of the President from Office

You need to read this! Rob Kall's declaration of war

Textbook descriptions of George Bush reveal psychopathy, and much worse.

The worst is yet to come; foreclosure fraud is the banksters' least problem

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend