Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 2 Share on LinkedIn 1 Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (4 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

The real problem with college sports - Part 1 of 3 parts

By       Message Neal Herrick     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 1 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 7/8/15

Author 92351
Become a Fan
  (4 fans)
From opednews.com/populum/uploadphotos/s_300_upload_wikimedia_org_92351_800px-Football_Game_276.gif: Football Game
Football Game
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Permission   Details   DMCA
div>

The real problem with college sports -- Part I of 3 parts

Taylor Branch, in an excellent article in the October, 2011 Atlantic Monthly, wrote "the real scandal is the very structure of college sports, wherein student-athletes generate billions of dollars for universities and private companies while earning nothing for themselves."

Mr. Branch is rightly outraged about the exploitation of, "student-athletes."[1] However, his claim that college sports generate billions of dollars for universities is questionable. Most sports departments operate at a loss. The commercialized sports programs of most Div. I and II schools don't generate money for education. They cost most schools money. For example, according to Benedict and Keteyan, Football Bowl Subdivision (FBS) schools spend more than $91,000 per athlete compared with just over $13,000 per student by other schools. Yet students across the country face steep tuition hikes and increased fees."[2]

Ben Mangrum writes "diminishing research budgets, the administrative erosion of the tenure system, the economic efficiency of adjunct labor, and rising tuition costs all subsidize the American college football system."[3]

Despite the rising tuition costs alluded to by Mangrum, Div. I and II schools continue to pay coaches outrageous salaries, build new athletic facilities and provide athletes with scholarships. All this is done with money that could be used to fund scholarships based on need and academic merit.

In short, sports department income is rarely used for educational purposes -- except to the extent that it is used to fund intramural and non-commercialized sports. Further, in addition to suffering net losses from their commercialized sports programs, many universities throw good money after bad. For example, the University of Miami, Ohio recently committed "more than $80 million -- much of it borrowed - to expand its football stadium . . ."[4]

College sports are not a "milk cow," for colleges and universities. They are, however, a milk cow for Div. I and II coaches, for the NCAA and for the commissioners of the NCAA's various conferences. The president of the NCAA, Mark Emmert, was paid approximately $1.8 million in 2013. Each of the commissioners of its 5 major conferences made more than $2 million per year. [5]

The real scandal

However, neither the exploitation of college athletes nor the waste of money on commercialized college sports is the real scandal. The real scandal is that commercialized sports in Div. I and II universities erode the quality of higher education in the US. Even if they contributed regular and substantial amounts to the academic departments of their universities, they would still be undesirable. They encourage hypocritical and corrupt behavior. They produce cynicism. They teach students that spectator sports, money, power and glory trump education. Commercialized sports and education do not mix. Div. III sports and intramural sports at all levels, on the other hand, support the goals of higher education.

Parts II and III of this article discuss these matters and suggest that "a student's right to organize" might offer a ray of hope for bringing an end to commercialized college sports.



[1] Athletes quite rightly feel that they are being exploited. For example, in 2013, among the ten schools with the largest athletic department expenses, Texas paid its coaches 55.2 million dollars and spent 10.5 million on its athletes. The University of Michigan was generous with both its coaches (44.7 million) and with its athletes (15.4 million). "Sports Chart of the Day, Athletic Department Expenses (2013)," Business Insider, Accessed June 7, 2015.

[2] Jeff Benedict and Armen Keteyan, The system, the glory and the scandal of big-time college football (2013). Quoted in Ben Mangrum, Ethos, and Mar. 27, 2014.

[3] Ben Mangrum in Ethos

[4] Cliff Poole, "Athletics cost colleges, students millions," The Cincinnati Enquirer, Sept. 13, 2013

[5] Jon Solomom, ""Inside College Sports," CBS Sports, June 30, 2015.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

http://www.governmentreform.org.

Neal Herrick is author of the award-wining After Patrick Henry (2009). His most recent book is (2014) Reversing America’s Decline. He is a former sailor, soldier, auto worker, railroad worker, assistant college football coach, (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The tragedy in the Middle East and Ukraine: canaries in a coal mine

The Tragedies in the Middle East and Ukraine: Who will bell the cat?

Sen Warner's views on Ukraine

Sen. Warner needs to hear from us.

The tragedies in the Middle East and Ukraine:" Who can de-claw the cat?

The Tragedies in the Middle East and Ukraine: Caging the Lynx