Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 3 Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Zeller-Nikolov climate discovery may turn the world upside down.

By       Message Christopher Calder       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   9 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)
Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 13727


The planet Venus
(Image by NASA)
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

Nature created the fundamental mathematical relationship now known as E=mc2. A mathematical finding, if proven valid, is a real phenomenon; as real as finding a diamond in a river bed. Nature creates fundamental mathematical relationships; humans only discover them.

The straightforward and crystal-clear mathematical discovery by Dr. Karl Zeller and Dr. Ned Nikolov has many enemies. If their finding is proven accurate, it could bankrupt the wind and solar industries and put heavy pressure on politicians to end biofuel mandates. It would embarrass most politicians and almost all climate scientists, even those who believe carbon dioxide has no significant effect on Earth temperatures.

The Zeller-Nikolov climate finding uses official NASA data to quantify the average temperatures of the hard-surfaced satellite bodies orbiting our Sun. The formula is not applicable to the gas planets: Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. Zeller and Nikolov claim to be able to determine the long-term average temperature of Venus, Earth, Mars, Titan (a moon of Saturn), and Triton (a moon of Neptune) by using just two informational values: their distance from the Sun and their atmospheric pressure.

Zeller and Nikolov have found that the gaseous composition of atmospheres is immaterial to determining long-term average temperatures. For example, the atmosphere of Venus is composed of 96.5% carbon dioxide, while Earth's atmosphere contains only .04% carbon dioxide, yet those vast differences are irrelevant to the mathematical calculations required to determine average temperatures. This mathematical proof tells us that even though Venus has 2,412 times more carbon dioxide than Earth measured as a percentage of its atmosphere, that CO2 has no measurable effects on its average long-term temperature. Zeller and Nikolov claim that carbon dioxide and all the other atmospheric gases only contribute to temperature by their physical mass and resultant atmospheric pressure. They point out that their predictions for planets and moons are accurate to within one degree Celsius, a confidence-inspiring finding so precise that coincidence can reasonably be ruled out.

- Advertisement -

The Zeller-Nikolov discovery means that Earth's atmosphere keeps us warm via gas-compression heating under the weight of Earth's approximately 300-mile-thick atmosphere, not by the greenhouse effect. An actual greenhouse has a glass wall enclosing it. Earth has no enclosure and is open to space, so the two scientists suggest that the term "greenhouse effect" be replaced by "atmospheric thermal enhancement." Heat is created by compressing atmospheric gases through the pull of gravity. Similarly, in a diesel engine a piston is used to compress gases to generate enough heat to eliminate the need for a spark plug. The tremendous gravitational pull on the enormous mass of Earth's atmosphere combined with solar radiation warms our planet just enough to allow carbon-based life forms to flourish.

If carbon dioxide was the powerful greenhouse gas alarmists claim it to be, the calculations for Venus would have to be dramatically different than the calculations for Earth, but they are the same. This tells us that CO2 has no measurable direct effect on planetary temperature, which makes perfect sense as the Earth has experienced severe ice ages when atmospheric CO2 levels were many times higher than they are today.

- Advertisement -

The carbon dioxide-driven greenhouse gas theory Swedish scientist Svante Arrhenius first proposed in 1896 has never been proven valid by empirical testing. Svante's ideas sounded plausible, so people accepted them without proof. More recently, American politicians literally ordered the IPCC to burn through enormous amounts of taxpayer dollars concocting wild and fanciful computer-model projections based on Svante's assumptions. As the old computer-programming saying goes, "garbage in, garbage out" (GIGO).

All of the IPCC's doomsday climate predictions have failed to materialize despite our heavily biased media's best efforts to distort and exaggerate. Ordinary summer heat waves and winter storm activity has been falsely portrayed as precursors to the end of the world, which will certainly come unless we elect more Democrats. Climate gurus keep pushing the date of catastrophe into the future because the global doom they keep predicting never arrives. What has arrived are ordinary and expected minor fluctuations in Earth's climate that have been going on since Earth was formed. Ask yourself, when did the Earth have a climate that was more pleasant and beneficial to mankind than the climate we have today? The honest answer is simply never.

Despite multiple technical reviews by scientists around the world, no one has found error in Zeller and Nikolov's mathematical formulas and specific computations. Objections raised against their discovery are largely that it does not fit accepted climate theories that are professionally and politically popular. Climate science has become an Orwellian tool of political power and an enormous money-making profession for scientists, professors, universities, state and federal government employees, and a thousand and one green-scam businesses. Just think of all the billions of dollars being spent on "global warming" and the mandated false remedies. No doom equals no costly remedies and no profits for those selling fear.

Real scientists know that you cannot control the weather with windmills and solar panels any more than you can control the weather with bowling balls and statues of dead politicians, yet the costly and impractical renewable-energy fad continues. Crony capitalists and ambitious but scientifically naive politicians from Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, to Beto O'Rourke, to billionaire Michael Bloomberg want taxpayers to spend trillions of dollars on energy schemes that have already raised the cost of food and energy all over the world. This has harmed the world's poor far more than the wealthy, the very opposite of what liberals are supposed to stand for. Now they want us to dramatically escalate our war against the carbon atom, the very element all our food and our own bodies are made of. Carbon creatures fighting carbon; human events rarely get more twisted and surreal than this.

4-minute YouTube interview with Dr. Karl Zeller

21-minute YouTube Nikolov presentation

- Advertisement -

PAPER 1 New Insights on the Physical Nature of the Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Deduced from an Empirical Planetary Temperature Model

PAPER 2 Unified Theory of Climate - Expanding the Concept of Atmospheric Greenhouse Effect Using Thermodynamic Principles: Implications for Predicting Future Climate Change

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Valuable 2  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Christopher Calder is an advocate for world food supply security with no financial interest in any energy related business.

Christopher Calder Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Zeller-Nikolov climate discovery may turn the world upside down.

What if Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR) really works?

Low Energy Nuclear Reaction passes big test in Switzerland

The Fusion Revolution

Revolutionary Thorium Reactor - The most environmentally beneficial power source on earth

Climate Change and the End Times

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

7 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments


Christopher Calder

Become a Fan
Author 13727

(Member since Mar 25, 2008), 16 articles, 26 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Science without the scientific method and a questioning mind is not real science. You cannot fight global warming religious fervor with provable facts because the whole point of all religion is to valiantly go beyond the realm of facts to achieve a higher spiritual goal. Just remember the hymn, "Onward Christian soldiers, marching as to war." How can you argue with that?

Submitted on Friday, Dec 28, 2018 at 3:27:54 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Adam Paquette

Become a Fan
Author 512796

(Member since Dec 31, 2018), 1 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Christopher Calder:   New Content

Dude, from the way you wrote this article, it's very clear that you didn't read the actual paper, and it's even clearer that you have no understanding of the scientific method. This paper isn't denying climate change, it's just posing a new way of looking at an empirically observed phenomena that we're calling climate change. Climate change isn't a theory or a religion as you put it. It's actually evidence, it's data. The global average temperature is increasing. Whether it's a result of human activity or not is up for debate but it is increasing. This paper is suggesting that the greenhouse effect may not be the cause for climate change. This paper suggests that the cause is more likely to be the increase in atmospheric pressure. This doesn't mean humans aren't responsible for this increase, but it doesn't necessarily mean we are either. It just means we need to put more research into that area.

PLEASE STOP SAYING THINGS LIKE YOU KNOW THEY'RE FACTS. You clearly have never done any research in your life so please stop talking like you did the actual research. Change your narrative to a maybe as opposed to a declarative because you're leading people astray and are blatantly lying. Even referencing things that you think sound smart like e=mc^2 (which has no relation at all to this by the way)

Submitted on Monday, Dec 31, 2018 at 2:56:44 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

David Wieland

Become a Fan
Author 512811

(Member since Jan 1, 2019), 1 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Adam Paquette:   New Content

Dr. Roy Spencer is responsible for analyzing global temperatures from satellite observations. From his blog:

Based upon the observed rate of global warming (which is too small for any individual to feel in their lifetime), and failed climate model projections, I'd say the current state of the science is not yet ready for primetime.

The warming may be real, but the data shows the rate is very slow. How did you miss this?

Submitted on Wednesday, Jan 2, 2019 at 4:49:09 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

j dial

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter

(Member since Nov 9, 2009), 27 fans, 31 articles, 49 quicklinks, 317 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content
Comment by j dial:

Unless you're easily swayed by arguments promising that dumping fossil fuels into the atmosphere will have no important lasting effect on the earth's climate, I would suggest you do a little investigating of the Zeller-Nikolov claims yourself. Here are a couple of sources: http://greenerblog.blogspot.com/2018/11/why-nikolov-and-zeller-are-wrong.html; https://philosophynow.org/issues/104/Climate_Science_and_Falsifiability


Incidentally, in 2018 Beto O'Rourke received more donations from the oil and gas industry than any other congressperson but Ted Cruz.


Submitted on Friday, Dec 28, 2018 at 3:36:17 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Christopher Calder

Become a Fan
Author 13727

(Member since Mar 25, 2008), 16 articles, 26 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to j dial:   New Content

Beto O'Rourke has jumped on the anti-carbon bandwagon, but it is all hypocrisy. Look how much fossil fuels Al Gore and his disciple, Leonardo DiCaprio, use. Leo has his own 450 foot fossil fuel powered yacht. Gore has two giant mansions and jets around the world all the time. They are both energy hogs and buying carbon credits is just a scam. It's like the old Catholic Church selling indulgences. Climate change is a new age religion, not a belief founded in fact. Watch these videos and see a more sane and honest view. ewable.50webs.com/Video-Tutorial.html

Submitted on Friday, Dec 28, 2018 at 4:26:36 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

Daniel Geery

Become a Fan
Author 1198

(Member since Jul 9, 2009), 72 fans, 236 articles, 3434 quicklinks, 15250 comments, 180 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Christopher Calder:   New Content

Hypocracy abounds, obviously, but I suggest you and these two gents 1) read the world news more carefully; 2) look around your neighborhood a good bit closer.

Submitted on Friday, Dec 28, 2018 at 6:35:37 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
IndentIndentIndent

Daniel Geery

Become a Fan
Author 1198

(Member since Jul 9, 2009), 72 fans, 236 articles, 3434 quicklinks, 15250 comments, 180 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Daniel Geery:   New Content

You may also want to do a search for criticism of these two characters to further your continued learning. Also check out the chemical interaction of thermal radiation and CO2.

Submitted on Friday, Dec 28, 2018 at 6:48:10 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Bob Stuart

Become a Fan
Author 26603

(Member since Nov 19, 2008), 3 fans, 1 articles, 504 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Why don't we have negative ratings available for handy use? Even if some sums here do add up, they don't explain our world, and only spread confusion.

Submitted on Saturday, Dec 29, 2018 at 3:54:31 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 
Indent

T. T.

Become a Fan
Author 512784

(Member since Dec 30, 2018), 1 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Bob Stuart:   New Content

I agree with Bob. What is the reason for not having down votes displayed?

Submitted on Sunday, Dec 30, 2018 at 8:49:33 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment