Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   9 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Truth about Martin Luther King's Assassination Peeks Through

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Edward Curtin       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 4   Must Read 3   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 4/7/18

Author 94064
- Advertisement -

By Edward Curtin

From flickr.com: Martin-Luther-King-Jr {MID-276641}
Martin-Luther-King-Jr
(Image by curatedcreation.com)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

"There's a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in." Leonard Cohen, Selected Poems, 1956-1968

It's been fifty years since Dr. Martin Luther King was murdered in Memphis, Tennessee on April 4, 1968 and nineteen years since the only trial in the case. In that 1999 Memphis civil trial (see transcript) brought by the King family, the jury found that King was murdered by a conspiracy that included governmental agencies. The corporate media, when they reported it at all, dismissed the jury's verdict and those who accepted it, including the entire King family led by Coretta Scott King, as delusional. Time magazine -- dutifully using the pejorative "conspiracy theory" label the CIA had in 1967 urged their mouthpieces to use -- called the verdict a confirmation of the King family's conspiracy theory and "lurid fantasies." The Washington Post compared those who believed it with those who claimed that Hitler was unfairly accused of genocide. A smear campaign ensued that has continued to the present day and then the fact that a trial ever occurred disappeared down the memory hole so that today most people never heard of it and assume MLK was killed by a crazy white racist, James Earl Ray, if they know even that.

- Advertisement -

Here and there, however, mainly through the alternative media, and through the monumental work and persistence of the King family lawyer in that trial, William Pepper, the truth about the assassination has surfaced. Through decades of research that extends well into the twenty-first century, Pepper has documented the parts played in the assassination by F.B.I. Director J. Edgar Hoover, the F.B.I., Army Intelligence, Memphis Police, and southern Mafia figures. On March 30, 2018, The Washington Post's crime reporter, Tom Jackman, published a four column front-page article, "Who killed Martin Luther King Jr.? His family believes James Earl Ray was framed." While not close to an endorsement of the trial's conclusions, it is a far cry from past nasty dismissals of those who agreed with the jury's verdict as conspiracy nuts or Hitler supporters. The Washington Post has a well-earned reputation for being the CIA's paper of record, but my reading of Jackman's article and its prominent placing suggests a split somewhere in the conscience(s) of journalists at the paper. Or perhaps it is a fortuitous accident. Whatever the case, after decades of clouding over the truth of MLK's assassination, some rays of truth have come peeping through, and on the front page of the WP at that.

Jackman makes it very clear that all the surviving King family members -- Bernice, Dexter, and Martin III -- are in full agreement that James Earl Ray, the accused assassin, did not kill their father, and that there was and continues to be a conspiracy to cover up the truth. He adds to that the words of the highly respected civil rights icon and U.S. Congressman from Georgia, Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.), who says, "I think there was a major conspiracy to remove Dr. King from the American scene," and former U.N. ambassador and Atlanta mayor Andrew Young who was with King at the Lorraine Motel when he was shot, who concurs, "I would not accept the fact that James Earl Ray pulled the trigger, and that is all that matters." Additionally, Jackman adds that Andrew Young emphasized that the assassination of King came after that of President Kennedy, Malcolm X, and a few months before that of Senator Robert Kennedy.

"We were living in a period of assassinations," he quotes Young as saying, a statement clearly intimating their linkages and coming from a widely respected and honorable man. So if Ray didn't kill MLK, then Oswald didn't kill JFK, and Sirhan didn't kill RFK is the implicit thought conveyed. Then who killed Malcom X? Could the same parties have killed them all? And who might they be?

- Advertisement -

But then, as if to pull back abruptly from this line of thought, Jackman quotes David Garrow, a Pulitzer Prize winning biographer of King, who has long held that James Earl Ray killed King. Yet the historian Garrow's statement is so condescending and illogical that a thoughtful person would be taken aback and think: How could an historian say that? Referring to the three remaining King family members as "children," although all are 50-60 years old, he says that they "are part of a larger population of American people who need to believe [my emphasis] that the assassination of a King or a Kennedy must be the work of mightier forces," not the victims "of small-fry, lifetime losers." (Notice how Kennedy, and one presumes he means just one Kennedy, JFK, is thrown in with King to include Oswald in the small-fry, lifetime loser category of the "real" killers, not the childish "need to believe" conclusions of meticulous scholars, such as James W. Douglass, author of the acclaimed JFK and the Unspeakable.) But then comes the kicker. The acclaimed historian Garrow says that credulous "people need to see [my emphasis] a balance between effect and cause. That if something has a huge evil effect, it should be [my emphasis] the result of a huge evil cause." Now anyone who has not completely lost their ability to think knows that an historian's rai son d'etre is to explore facts in an effort to establish believable relationships between effects and causes, not by following a strict scientific method, but by arranging one's research findings (documents, witness interviews and statements, etc.) within a narrative structure to reach logical conclusions. Historians "need to believe" that effects have causes and when they are good historians the issue is not one of balancing but of truth. They follow the evidence to truthful conclusions, no matter where it leads. So for Garrow to dismiss the King family and other Americans because of a delusional "need to believe" is patently absurd and not intellectually honest, yet it is a trope that has echoed down the years whenever there is a need to brush off "conspiracy theorists" as ignorant children.

Then as one reads through Jackman's article he notices three brief statements, one from Robert Blakey, the chief counsel of the House Select Committee on Assassinations, another from John Campbell, who investigated the King murder for the Shelby County, Tennessee district attorney's office, and a third from Barry Kowalski who reinvestigated the case under Attorney General Janet Reno in 1998. All three attest to Ray's guilt. But Jackman gives them little space, approximately a half-page, in an article that extends to nine printed pages.

The remainder of the article -- six printed pages -- is primarily devoted to the work of William Pepper, the attorney for the King family in the 1999 civil trial in Memphis that found the U.S government liable for the killing of King and the author of three books on the murder, including his latest, The Plot to Kill King, a voluminous and heavily documented masterly work that makes an irrefutable case that the U.S. government and not James Earl Ray killed MLK, and to those who support those findings, including King's daughter, Bernice, who is given the final word. Jackman quotes her as saying,

"I don't believe James Earl Ray killed my father. It's hard to know exactly who. I'm certainly clear that there has been a conspiracy, from the government down to the mafia"there had to be more than one person involved in all this. I think it was all planned."

This breakthrough article, the first such piece on the front page of a major newspaper to give such space to critics of the commonplace "lone nut" explanation for MLK's murder, proves Leonard Cohen's words prophetic: "There's a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."

Even a crack in The Washington Post wherein may dwell persons of conscience, despite the paper's history of doing the devil's work.

- Advertisement -

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 4   Must Read 3   Supported 3  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Edward Curtin is a writer whose work has appeared widely. He teaches sociology at Massachusetts College of Liberal Arts. His website is http://edwardcurtin.com/

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Remembering Albert Camus' "The Plague": It is US

Prof. Noam Chomsky, Anarchist, Lectures Leftists on Why They Should Vote for Neo-Liberal, War Hawk Hillary Clinton

The Coming Wars to End All Wars

The "Deep State" Then and Now

Happy Fifth Anniversary, Hillary, You've Destroyed Libya

The 2001 Anthrax Deception

Comments Image Post Article Comment

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
Connect with Facebook     Connect with Twitter            Register with Facebook     Register with Twitter

Comment:   

You can enter 2000 characters. To remove limit, please click here.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 
Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

6 people are discussing this page, with 9 comments  Post Comment


Edward Curtin

Become a Fan
Author 94064

(Member since Jun 15, 2014), 15 fans, 83 articles, 12 quicklinks, 172 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Truth sometimes pops up in strange places.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 7, 2018 at 3:07:38 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Bill Willers

Become a Fan
Author 8025

(Member since Oct 1, 2007), 6 fans, 31 articles, 1 quicklinks, 128 comments, 4 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Pepper has given a number of speeches regarding his findings. In lieu of reading his book, a speech (I'm finding I'm unable to add a link here) can be found by googling "William Pepper Vimeo 9/11 Truth Film Festival". It's the most recent I know of, given just six months ago. Pepper, over the years, went so far as to interview the actual shooter, interview the daughter of the late US Colonel who organized the backup snipers, and hospital personnel who saw Dr. Breen Bland, smother the still alive King with a pillow after spitting on him. Pepper has even given a similar speech to other groups, including Press, that are easy to find. Mainstream won't touch this, of course, and, astonishingly, PBS is this week running a piece titled "Roads to Memphis", a pure fabrication that tracks James Earl Ray as assassin. PBS may be the worst of all sources any more, because being partially publicly funded, it claims to be most trusted.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 7, 2018 at 6:00:15 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (3+)
Help
 
Indent

Edward Curtin

Become a Fan
Author 94064

(Member since Jun 15, 2014), 15 fans, 83 articles, 12 quicklinks, 172 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Bill Willers:   New Content

Very true, Bill. PBS is a disgrace, as are the other mainstream media. Fifty years of a coverup and counting.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 7, 2018 at 6:45:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784

(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 35 fans, 1 articles, 7 quicklinks, 4407 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

The Empire has dealt with powerful political figures who were supported by people's movements in the US the same way they have always dealt with the same in countries they dominate. Rigged elections, false flags and assassinations are standard fare for capitalist empire. And war of course. To not see this is to be willfully blind. There's a lot of that still going around unfortunately.

Submitted on Saturday, Apr 7, 2018 at 7:38:42 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 

Daniel Geery

Become a Fan
Author 1198

(Member since Jul 9, 2009), 69 fans, 158 articles, 3265 quicklinks, 14081 comments, 180 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

A great many "items" come to mind: 9/11, Syria, Russia, North Korea, Paul Wellstone, Iraq, Native Americans, immigrants, Washington D.C., extinction, but hell! I better shut up so I don't sound too paranoid...

Submitted on Monday, Apr 9, 2018 at 5:48:53 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Edward Curtin

Become a Fan
Author 94064

(Member since Jun 15, 2014), 15 fans, 83 articles, 12 quicklinks, 172 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Daniel Geery:   New Content

Or accurate!

Submitted on Monday, Apr 9, 2018 at 9:07:27 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Julian Lobato

Become a Fan
Author 82704
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Oct 18, 2012), 1 fan, 193 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Apparently Americans need to believe the lies lest they marginalize themselves with their CONSPIRACY THEORIES.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 9, 2018 at 7:52:42 AM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Jim Kavanagh

Become a Fan
Author 83077
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Oct 29, 2012), 19 fans, 81 articles, 4 quicklinks, 168 comments, 4 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

Thanks for this, Ed,

See this fabulous interview Lee Camp did with William Pepper: https://youtu.be/8OYpDWrzu7E

The story is even worse than I imagined. Watch to the end, and the reveal about King being killed in the hospital.

Submitted on Monday, Apr 9, 2018 at 6:53:55 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Edward Curtin

Become a Fan
Author 94064

(Member since Jun 15, 2014), 15 fans, 83 articles, 12 quicklinks, 172 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Jim Kavanagh:   New Content

Thanks, Jim. I've seen that interview and, as you may know, did a long review of Pepper's book in 2016. The part about the hospital is one of the weakest parts of the book since he has only one source for the allegation. It could be true, but I'm not fully convinced as I am with his overall case. If the hospital story is true, and it's highly plausible, it is so repulsive it makes me want to vomit. My review is here in a recent re-posting:


click here

Submitted on Monday, Apr 9, 2018 at 7:30:07 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment