Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Trump Campaign: Bad for America, but Good for CBS

By       Message Fair News       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 3/2/16

Author 503181
- Advertisement -

Reprinted from FAIR

By *Jim Naureckas

Les Moonves: 'It may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS.'
Les Moonves: 'It may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS.'
(Image by (cc photo: David Shankbone/Wikimedia))
  Permission   Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

CBS CEO Les Moonves, who in December (Intercept, 12/10/15; FAIR.org, 1/23/16) said of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, "Go Donald! Keep getting out there!" because "the more they spend, the better it is for us," had more to say about the business of politics at another investors' conference, as The Intercept's Lee Fang (2/29/16) reported.

- Advertisement -

Speaking to the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom Conference at San Francisco's Park Hotel, Moonves observed that "in local [broadcasting], the No. 1 word is 'political' [advertising]," and continued:

"Man, who would have expected the ride we're all having right now? This is pretty amazing... Who would have thought that this circus would come to town?

"But, you know -- it may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS, that's all I got to say.

"So what can I say? It's -- you know, the money's rolling in, and this is fun."

Moonves noted that the election has been a boost for ratings -- "We had a debate a couple of weeks ago, it was 14 million people on a Saturday night. You know, it's amazing, that's all I can say" -- but, more importantly, the spending by candidates on political advertising goes directly into CBS's coffers:

"Yeah, [Trump's] getting a lot of free media, but all that's happening out there, there's a lot of money in the marketplace, there's a lot of money in the marketplace...

- Advertisement -

"They're not even talking about issues. They're throwing bombs at each other, and I think the advertising reflects that. Most of the ads are not about issues; they're sort of like the debates. They're saying, he did this or he did that. Doesn't say what I stand for.

"I've never seen anything like this, and this is going to be a very good year for us. Sorry. It's a terrible thing to say, but bring it on, Donald, go ahead, keep going."

Moonves did not want his cheering on Trump -- whose campaign promotes xenophobia, war crimes and threats of violence against various groups, including journalists -- to be mistaken for an endorsement:

"I said that at another investor conference, and the next day some blog put out, 'Moonves Supporting Trump Wholeheartedly.' I said, no no no, I'm not taking any side. I'm just saying, for us, economically, Donald's place in this election is a good thing."

Moonves chuckles like a Bond villain as he tells his wealthy audience how his company is profiting at the expense of the nation. It's not actually all that funny, though, for a television executive to celebrate how a campaign that's hurting the United States is driving his network's profit bonanza. Among CBS's chief assets are the 16 TV broadcasting licenses it holds, along with its 117 radio station licenses. These licenses each include a public interest clause:

"The licensee shall, during the term of this license, render such broadcasting service as will serve the public interest, convenience, or necessity to the full extent of the privileges herein conferred."

When a broadcaster cheers on the electoral "circus" ("bring it on, Donald, go ahead, keep going") that he acknowledges "may not be good for America, but it's damn good for CBS," can he really be said to be "render[ing] such broadcasting service as will serve the public interest"? Or when he brags about how much money he's making from running ads that are "not even talking about issues" sort of like the debates" -- you know, the ones that his corporation helps put on?

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity in the press and by scrutinizing media (more...)
 

Fair News Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Corporate Media Analysts' Indifference to US Journalists Facing 70 Years in Prison

North Dakota's War on 1st Amendment Goes From Bad to Worse

Iran Doesn't Have a Nuclear Weapons Program. Why Do Media Keep Saying It Does?

As Democratic Voters Shift Left, "Liberal Media" Keep Shifting Right

Ignoring Washington's Role in Yemen Carnage, 60 Minutes Paints US as Savior

Neo-Nazi Group Linked to Murder of British MP Has Long Been Ignored by US Media