Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 12 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/5/20

The Threat of a Nuclear War Between the US and Russia Is Now at Its Greatest Since 1983

Author 5173
Message Scott Ritter
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

General Wolters' response was straight to the point
General Wolters' response was straight to the point 'Senator I'm a fan of flexible first use policy'
(Image by Vox)
  Details   DMCA

US Air Force Gen. Tod D Wolters told the Senate this week he "is a fan of flexible first strike" regarding NATO's nuclear weapons, thereby exposing the fatal fallacy of the alliance's embrace of American nuclear deterrence policy.

It was one of the most remarkable yet underreported exchanges in recent Senate history. Earlier this week, during the testimony before the Senate Armed Services Committee of General Tod Wolters, the commander of US European Command and, concurrently, as the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe (SACEUR) also the military head of all NATO armed forces, General Wolters engaged in a short yet informative exchange with Senator Deb Fischer, a Republican from the state of Nebraska.

Following some initial questions and answers focused on the alignment of NATO's military strategy with the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the US, which codified what Wolters called "the malign influence on behalf of Russia" toward European security, Senator Fischer asked about the growing recognition on the part of NATO of the important role of US nuclear deterrence in keeping the peace. "We all understand that our deterrent, the TRIAD, is the bedrock of the security of this country," Fischer noted. "Can you tell us about what you are hearing"from our NATO partners about this deterrent?"

Wolters responded by linking the deterrence provided to Europe by the US nuclear TRIAD with the peace enjoyed on the European continent over the past seven decades. Fischer asked if the US nuclear umbrella was "vital in the freedom of NATO members"; Wolters agreed. Remarkably, Wolters linked the role of nuclear deterrence with the NATO missions in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere outside the European continent. NATO's mission, he said, was to "proliferate deterrence to the max extent practical to achieve greater peace."

Then came the piece de resistance of the hearing. "What are your views, Sir," Senator Fischer asked, "of adopting a so-called no-first-use policy. Do you believe that that would strengthen deterrence?"

General Wolters' response was straight to the point. "Senator, I'm a fan of flexible first use policy."

Under any circumstance, the public embrace of a "flexible first strike" policy regarding nuclear weapons employment by the Supreme Allied Commander in Europe should generate widespread attention. When seen in the context of the recent deployment by the US of a low-yield nuclear warhead on submarine-launched ballistic missiles carried onboard a Trident submarine, however, Wolters' statement is downright explosive. Add to the mix the fact the US recently carried out a wargame where the US Secretary of Defense practiced the procedures for launching this very same "low yield" weapon against a Russian target during simulated combat between Russia and NATO in Europe, and the reaction should be off the charts. And yet there has been deafening silence from both the European and US press on this topic.

There is, however, one party that paid attention to what General Wolters had to sayRussia. In a statement to the press on February 25the same date as General Wolters' testimony, Sergey Lavrov, the Russian Foreign Minister stated that "We note with concern that Washington's new doctrinal guidelines considerably lower the threshold of nuclear weapons use." Lavrov added that this doctrine had to be viewed in the light "of the persistent deployment of US nuclear weapons on the territory of some NATO allies and the continued practice of the so-called joint nuclear missions."

Rather than embracing a policy of "flexible first strike", Lavrov suggested that the US work with Russia to re-confirm "the Gorbachev-Reagan formula, which says that there can be no winners in a nuclear war and it should never be unleashed." This proposal was made 18 months ago, Lavrov noted, and yet the US has failed to respond.

Complicating matters further are the 'Defender 2020' NATO military exercises underway in Europe, involving tens of thousands of US troops in one of the largest training operations since the end of the Cold War. The fact that these exercises are taking place at a time when the issue of US nuclear weapons and NATO's doctrine regarding their employment against Russia is being actively tracked by senior Russian authorities only highlights the danger posed.

On February 6, General Valery Gerasimov, the Russian Chief of Staff, met with General Wolters to discuss 'Defender 2020' and concurrent Russian military exercises to be held nearby to deconflict their respective operations and avoid any unforeseen incidents. This meeting, however, was held prior to the reports about a US/NATO nuclear wargame targeting Russian forces going public, and prior to General Wolters' statement about "flexible first use" of NATO nuclear weapons.

In light of these events, General Gerasimov met with French General Fançois Lecointre, the Chief of the Defense Staff, to express Russia's concerns over NATO's military moves near the Russian border, especially the Defender 2020 exercise which was, General Gerasimov noted, "held on the basis of anti-Russian scenarios and envisage training for offensive operations."

General Gerasimov's concerns cannot be viewed in isolation, but rather must be considered in the overall historical context of NATO-Russian relations. Back in 1983, the then-Soviet Union was extremely concerned about a series of realistic NATO exercises, known as 'Able Archer '83,' which in many ways mimicked the modern-day Defender 2020 in both scope and scale. Like Defender 2020, Able Archer '83 saw the deployment of tens of thousands of US forces into Europe, where they assumed an offensive posture, before transitioning into a command post exercise involving the employment of NATO nuclear weapons against a Soviet target.

So concerned was Moscow about these exercises, and the possibility that NATO might use them as a cover for an attack against Soviet forces in East Germany, that the Soviet nuclear forces were placed on high alert. Historians have since observed that the threat of nuclear war between the US and the USSR was at that time the highest it had been since the Cuban Missile Crisis in 1962.

US and NATO officials would do well to recall the danger to European and world security posed by the "Able Archer '83" exercise and the potential for Soviet miscalculations when assessing the concerns expressed by General Gerasimov today. The unprecedented concentration of offensive NATO military power on Russia's border, coupled with the cavalier public embrace by General Wolters of a "flexible first strike" nuclear posture by NATO, has more than replicated the threat model presented by Able Archer '83. In this context, it would not be a stretch to conclude that the threat of nuclear war between the US and Russia is the highest it has been since Able Archer '83.

 

Must Read 4   Valuable 4   News 3  
Rate It | View Ratings

Scott Ritter Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Scott Ritter served as a former Marine Corps officer from 1984 until 1991, and as a UN weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991 until 1998. He is the author of several books, including "Iraq Confidential" (Nation Books, 2005) and "Target Iran" (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Did Trump Just Threaten to Attack Iran with Nukes? "We're Ready for the Absolute Worst" Says Trump

There's One Way to Stop Trump From Acting on Nuclear Threats

The U.S. Stands to Lose Much More Than a War With Iran

How Turkey Lost a Battle of Wills and Force to Russia

Donald Trump's Iran Humiliation

Three Reasons Why "Fire and Fury" Won't Work With Iran

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 2, 2011), 43 fans, 78 articles, 3665 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

  New Content

Is there a face mask that's effective against a nuclear fireball? Got toilet paper?

This madness will not end until we end it --- or it ends us.

Submitted on Thursday, Mar 5, 2020 at 10:22:39 PM

  Recommend  (1+)
Help

Fred W

Become a Fan
Author 8452
(Member since Oct 30, 2007), 2 fans, 1 quicklinks, 434 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Surely, Joe Biden will be just the person to steer us through this difficult period!

Submitted on Friday, Mar 6, 2020 at 2:34:52 AM

  Recommend  (1+)
Help
Indent

John Rachel

Become a Fan
Author 66223
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 2, 2011), 43 fans, 78 articles, 3665 comments, 2 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

Reply to Fred W:   New Content

Joe's got Hunter studying up on these situations. He can now locate Russia on a map. If Joe can just get Hunter on the Board of Directors for Rosneft or Cosmos International, the Russkies will back off and start acting like a civilized nation.

Submitted on Friday, Mar 6, 2020 at 4:03:51 AM

  Recommend  (2+)
Help
IndentIndent

Michael Dewey

Become a Fan
Author 11470
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Feb 15, 2008), 19 fans, 21 articles, 6 quicklinks, 3776 comments, 17 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to John Rachel:   New Content

You are so funny, way ahead of your time. Be looked back at as an unknown giney.

Submitted on Friday, Mar 6, 2020 at 6:17:11 AM

  Recommend  (2+)
Help

Michael Dewey

Become a Fan
Author 11470
Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Feb 15, 2008), 19 fans, 21 articles, 6 quicklinks, 3776 comments, 17 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linked In Page Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

From what Lawrence Wilkerson says, who retired after finding out the CIA knowlingly lied to them about WMD in Iraq, he says the foreign policy is run by religious people who think it's god's will for some great 3rd world war so they can get myth of wanted selfish rapture.

We are all been thrown down in from that war in heaven of Revelation 12. Like how The Doors sang, "Into this world we are thrown."

I like to stay more positive with Joe Diffie's Rocken, "Welcome to earth third rock from the sun. All of the chaos makes perfect sense when spinning around through space."

Am confident that at right time them Rock and Rollers with insight of all this will shine brightly when given control of the TV in Daniel 12:3. They can restore the spirit meant to be behind the good news, which has gotten slandered through time and even looks to be the IMAGE of the 2 beasts of church and state in Revelation 13. Both have foundations we can restore domestic tranquility.

Submitted on Friday, Mar 6, 2020 at 5:40:27 AM

  Recommend  (2+)
Help