Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 5/23/12

The Sanity of Diplomacy with Iran Replacing the Insanity of War?

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   No comments
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)




(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

IAEA chief Yukiya Amano

Photo (AFP FARS News, Hamed Jafarnejad)



Maybe, just maybe, talk of war with Iran over its nuclear program will finally subside and come to an inglorious end.

Iran just met with IAEA chief Yukiya Amano in Tehran over the weekend and an agreement in principle was reached to allow inspections of secret military facilities, particularly Parchin, that were previously inaccessible to the U.N. inspectors.

Parchin is an Iranian research and development facility producing high explosives and other arms which could presumably be used in nuclear weapons, (something Iran has denied and 17 U.S. intelligence agencies have agreed that Iran suspended its nuclear weapons development in 2003).

It must be remembered that Iran has always had U.N. inspectors at its nuclear facilities as part of its membership in the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, has been in basic compliance and thus allowed under the treaty to have a nuclear development program for peaceful purposes.

Also today, the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council, plus Germany are meeting with Iran in Baghdad over its nuclear program and wants the suspension of it enriching uranium to 20% purity which can easily enriched to bomb grade. Meanwhile Iran wants any concessions it makes on its nuclear development to include the dropping of sanctions on its oil exports and its central bank.

So it appears that real diplomacy may be superseding talk of war with Iran.

Though Israel responded to the latest diplomacy as an Iranian delay tactic, a smokescreen and a ploy to buy time and move forward in development of a nuclear weapon, at least there's no overt maneuvering by the Israeli's at this time to suggest they're waiting for the diplomacy to falter and end in a stalemate so they can resume their bellicosity with talk of an attack being imminent.

Maybe the sanity of diplomacy and negotiations with Iran permanently replaces the insanity of war with that beleaguered country. Let's hope so.  


Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend