The Right to Bear Arms? (even in a well regulated militia?)

This speaks for itself.



Can you think of any legitimate reason for this tool of death to exist?

---------------

Update

Well, maybe this video doesn't speak for itself. Editor Deena Stryker and others seem to want more. Here is what I noticed when I viewed it.

* The video obviously is intended to promote the weapon to the viewer. (Who among your neighbors should own one of these?)

* The demonstration extols the possibility of firing 18 rounds into the torso of a person in about 2 seconds. (It's a torso, not a bull-eye target.)

* There is a mood of thrill seeking about it. (No discussion of it's tactical limitations, safety features, etc.)

* No discussion of the legality of fully automatic hand guns.

* The narrator cautions us not to leave the selector in full-auto position whilst inserting a fresh magazine. (I presume that there is some risk it might start firing? He doesn't elaborate.)

There there are the issues the very existence of such a gun raises. It's simple, durable (he cools it by rinsing it with cold water). He points out that there are only a few parts that make it different from the semi-automatic conventional model. Presumable a clever gunsmith could rework the Model 17 to make it a Model 18. How long will it be before gangs in our major cities have such weapons?

I posted this to provoke a dialog. What do you, dear reader, think?

(Article changed on September 22, 2014 at 12:16)