Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 20 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 12/29/19

The Torture Report Is "Don't Miss" Television

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   4 comments
Author 503310
Message John Kiriakou
Become a Fan
  (41 fans)

From Reader Supported News

The Report poster.
The Report poster.
(Image by Wikipedia (commons.wikimedia.org))
  Details   DMCA

I finally took the time on Christmas Day to sit and watch Amazon's new film The Report, written and directed by Scott Z. Burns, on Senate Intelligence Committee investigator Daniel Jones and his investigation of the CIA's torture program. In the interest of transparency, I was a script consultant on the film, although I never saw the final script and I had no idea how it would turn out until I saw it on television like everybody else.

The Report is "don't miss" television. I experienced the events depicted in it first-hand in the CIA's Counterterrorist Center (CTC) and as the CIA's chief of counterterrorist operations in Pakistan. In mid-2002 I became the daily briefer for Jim Pavitt, the CIA's deputy director for operations. I worked directly under the notorious CTC director Jose Rodriguez and the equally notorious Gina Haspel. I knew these people well. Scott Burns captures them perfectly. You will come to realize only minutes into this film that our intelligence services and the White House are run by sociopaths -- people with no capacity for remorse or regret, people for whom human rights, civil rights, civil liberties, and the rule of law mean literally nothing. You will see, too, that the CIA will crush anyone it deems a threat to its own dominance of the government narrative.

In the end, The Report is a tale of cowardice. Certainly Dan Jones is a hero, both in the film and in real life. The guy singlehandedly took on the CIA and, regardless of what was good for his career or his personal life, dug deeper and deeper into the CIA's crimes to the point that Obama's CIA director, John Brennan, tried to have him arrested.

The cowardice, though, is on display everywhere else, from the CIA to the White House to the Justice Department to Capitol Hill. And it was not limited to the cartoon characters who made up the Bush administration. It extended deep into the Obama White House, with Chief of Staff Dennis McDonough reminding us repeatedly that Obama had sold himself to the American public as "the first post-partisan president." What a joke. That narrative doesn't play here. The cowardice is on display on Capitol Hill, where nearly every Republican senator on the Intelligence Committee voted against even investigating the torture program. Why? Just because.

Burns takes us methodically from the captures of Abu Zubaydah in March 2002 and Khalid Shaikh Muhammad in August 2002 to the creation of the torture program in the minds of unqualified contract psychologists James Mitchell and Bruce Jessen, reminding us that their PhD dissertations were not on issues surrounding torture, but on nutrition and family counseling respectively. (And he tells Feinstain in one scene that the CIA has paid them $80 million for their "services.") Burns shows us how Justice Department attorneys John Yoo and Jay Bybee practically stood on their heads to justify and "legalize" a torture program that was unjustifiable and illegal. He shows us how US Attorney John Durham, now the great hope of liberals who think he's going to prosecute John Brennan for his role in the "Russiagate" investigation, ignored Dan Jones's repeated entreaties to share information, only to then close the case on CIA torture and say that it was not prosecutable.

Burns shows us the psychopathy of CIA officials like Rodriguez, Haspel, Pavitt, George Tenet, and ultimately John Brennan, the boogeyman in the film, even though he represented that post-partisan "progressive" president, all of whom continued to defend and promote the torture program even after it was conclusively proven to be a failure. Rodriguez's cable to CIA field operatives, telling them to "stop putting objections (to torture) in writing," shows him as the real monster in those early days. Haspel's order to the CIA chief at the secret torture site to destroy videotaped evidence of the torture doesn't make her look so good either.

None of this was new, however. The real revelation in the film was the fact that so many post-torture program officials and Democrats were co-conspirators in this whole mess. Former CIA director Michael Hayden, who headed the organization after the torture program had ended, went on the Sunday morning talk shows after the killing of Osama bin Laden along with former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, also a post-torture appointee, to perpetuate the lie that torture led the CIA to bin Laden's location. That position had been conclusively proven false. But that false narrative was also endorsed by members of the Obama National Security Council, including John Brennan.

Another important data point that was "new" to most Americans was how the CIA cooperated with Hollywood film studios on movies such as Zero Dark Thirty and television series like "24" to continue to perpetuate the lie that torture worked and led to bin Laden. At one point in The Report, Senator Dianne Feinstein's chief of staff tells Jones upon the release of Zero Dark Thirty, "The CIA just got the president re-elected."

Even John Kerry, that self-proclaimed hero of peace and the left, comes out in opposition to Feinstein's decision to release a heavily-redacted version of the Torture Report's Executive Summary, saying that its release would cause the coalition against ISIS to collapse. Ridiculous. (I was John Kerry's intelligence advisor and senior investigator on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee when he chaired it. The American people have no idea just how conservative he is.)

In the end, Jones gives us his bottom line when he says, "They said the Enhanced Interrogation Techniques saved lives. But all they did was make it impossible to prosecute." He's absolutely right.

When I moved from analysis to operations at the CIA in 1998, I was told very clearly, "The ultimate mission is to protect the Agency." Every officer knew that if he got into trouble, he would be abandoned, at least bureaucratically. The Agency didn't care about you. But, by God, you'd better care about the Agency. The same was true at the White House. "The mission is to protect the president." The Report shows us why these are the most dangerous mission statements in the world.

Reader Supported News is the Publication of Origin for this work. Permission to republish is freely granted with credit and a link back to Reader Supported News.

 

Well Said 2   Valuable 2  
Rate It | View Ratings

John Kiriakou Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Kiriakou spent 14 years at the CIA and two years in a federal prison for blowing the whistle on the agency's use of torture. He served on John Kerry's Senate Foreign Relations Committee for two years as senior investigator into the Middle (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Forcing the Innocent to Plead Guilty, an American Disgrace

Brennan and Clapper Should Not Escape Prosecution

An Incompetent FBI Dropped the Ball on Syed Farook

If Hillary Clinton Gets a Pass on Espionage From President Obama, So Should Whistleblowers

Time for Trump To Do the Right Thing on Immigration

The US Postal Service Is Spying On Us

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

4 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments


Don Smith

Become a Fan (Member since Feb 25, 2009), 22 fans, 145 articles, 597 quicklinks, 1886 comments, 45 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

It's great that this news came out, so that there might be some accountability for the crimes committed.


On the right there's a "How would you rate this?" box. Maybe it should have an additional option: Depressing.

Submitted on Sunday, Dec 29, 2019 at 10:17:03 PM

  Recommend  (3+)
Help

David William Pear

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Nov 29, 2014), 51 fans, 80 articles, 404 quicklinks, 3981 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook Page Twitter Page Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

The movie is good as far as it goes, which is not far enough. Like most movies the "book" is far better, even with all the redactions. Here is the pdf. Some of the more dramatic events were covered as Kiriakou wrote about. Many more were not.

My main criticism is the ending. Again even with airing the dirty laundry, the movie ends on the theme of "American Exceptionalism". The Hollywood ending is that 'America' is exceptional enough to admit its mistakes and learns from them. That is total B.S.

The US intelligence agencies have been torturing people long before Sept. 11th, 2001 and I have no doubt that they still are. I don't believe that Obama ended the program (just as domestic spying, drones, and Gitmo were not ended) and the Trump administration and his cabinet have given the green light to torture.

I know from my own personal military experience that there is nothing new about US torture programs. Many authoritative books have been written on the Phoenix Program, "snatch and snuff" operations, and assassinations of civilians being routine in the Vietnam war. Suck programs were also used in the covert wars in Laos, Cambodia and Thailand. The Phoenix program was the model for the 20th century War on Terror.

Then their are the documentations of US-backed war crimes by the Contras in Nicaragua and the US-backed death squads in Latin America. These examples are just the tip of the iceberg, so to speak. An honest read of US history is a ghoulish history of abominations.

As far as Diane Feinstein and McCain (bomb, bomb, bomb) being "heros", I find that hard to swallow. It is well known that members of Congress (including for sure Pelosi) knew about the torture programs in 2002 and said and did nothing about it. They were in on the conspiracy.

The reason these programs existed and continue is because the US wars of aggression produce a slew of psychopaths who get enjoyment and a rush from violence. It is also impossible to convince these types that torture does not "work", again because they enjoy their work.

Submitted on Monday, Dec 30, 2019 at 2:45:27 AM

  Recommend  (6+)
Help
Indent

Richard Pietrasz

Become a Fan
Author 6357
(Member since Jun 7, 2007), 14 fans, 1 quicklinks, 2974 comments, 1 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to David William Pear:   New Content

I agree with you on Pelosi and Feinstein. The latter represents me in the Senate. The member of the California Congressional delegation that stands out is Barbara Lee, the only vote in Congress against re-escalating the Afghan war in 2001. As it happens, Lee represents my daughter.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jan 1, 2020 at 6:20:57 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help

David Watts

Become a Fan
Author 10429
(Member since Jan 31, 2008), 14 fans, 27 articles, 29 quicklinks, 2478 comments, 28 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

NASA War Document.

"Capture, torture, Americans in living color in Prime Time."

Deborah Tavares: We need to move on from the illusion, the non-reality we are living in. You need to move into a new reality formed by the truths that these documents convey. From those realities then you can look at solutions. You can't "shoot from the hip" and look for solutions if you have not learned who is doing this to us, how they are doing this to us, and the documents that tell us how they are doing this to us. These documents will tell you.

This is no longer a debate! We don't need to look for more verifiable proof that people are becoming sick from EMFs, RFs, smart meters. The NASA WAR DOCUMENT shows that that is their goal. It is incarceration, it is enslavement, it is depopulation! And it is massive mind control. The frequencies have multiple purposes.

Dot4: NASA WAR DOCUMENT. If These Three Simple Documents Don't Wake People Up, They Must Be Comatose.

Submitted on Monday, Dec 30, 2019 at 10:20:23 PM

  Recommend  (1+)
Help