Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 21 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 3/14/11

The Real "Dracula" within Our Midst

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   No comments
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)

All the political "flap-doodling" we've heard lately (mostly from the Republicans) regarding a possible government shutdown, the debt, the budget deficit "crisis," whether on the national or state scenes, are pure hokum.

That's because the one fiscal item barely discussed that is THE primary reason this "crisis" even exists is of course the sacrosanct defense budget and the costs of our wars (the latter not included in the budget but paid for as a "supplement" approved by the Congress).

The defense budget (cost of wars included) dwarf all other expenditures in the budget including social security, Medicare and Medicaid. And what exactly do we get for our money?

Yesterday, the New York Times had a piece [1] listing (in op-chart form) the eight most unnecessary defense systems [2] and their costs since inception including cost overruns. They included:

1.        Ballistic Missile Defense- Initiated 1961, Cost $135 billion w/ add'l cost of $40 billion over the next 3 fiscal yrs.

2.        Littoral Combat System- Initiated 2003, Cost $30 billion when completed in 2015

3.        Future Combat System- Initiated 2003, Cost $340 billion w/$248 billion in excess

4.        Ford Class Supercarrier-Initiated 2007, Cost $120 billion for 10 carriers, to be completed by 2040

5.        F-35 Lightning II, Initiated 2000, Cost $325 Billion for 2,457 fighters w/ $147 billion in overruns

6.        Global Information Grid, Initiated 1991, Cost $300 billion

7.        Mine Resistant Ambush Protection Vehicle, Initiated 1978, Cost $36 billion, upkeep $3.2 billion a yr.

8.        Navy/Marine Corps Intranet, Initiated 2000, Cost $10 billion w/ $1 billion annual cost


None of these defense appropriations are necessary and missile defense has always proved unsuccessful in every test where simple decoys overwhelm a single test (even those tests conducted in perfect conditions). It can easily be overwhelmed by MIRV's (multiple independently targeted re-entry vehicles). Besides there are no enemy threats, imminent or otherwise that exist to rationally justify (the operative words) building and/or making them.


But reason doesn't enter the discussion of why we build them or need them.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend