Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Progressive's Guide to Corporate Democrat Speak

By       (Page 1 of 4 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   2 comments
Author 77715
Message Richard Eskow
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)

From Truthdig

Pete Buttigieg speaks at the Iowa State Fair.
Pete Buttigieg speaks at the Iowa State Fair.
(Image by (Gage Skidmore / Flickr))
  Details   DMCA

"Purity test"? "Pragmatic progressive"? "Free stuff"? What are these politicians talking about?

If you're confused, you're not alone. Certain words and phrases are routinely used by "centrist" political candidates. By design, these terms are imprecise, emotionally charged, and often self-contradicting. In fact, the word "centrist" is just such a term, since polling shows that the economic viewpoint of these candidates -- especially regarding health care, Social Security, education and other social programs -- is often well to the right of the general public.

Pete Buttigieg's recent use of the term "purity test" is a case in point. While the Midwestern mayor used it to describe criticism of big-donor fundraising, it has also been applied to policies such as Medicare for All and the Green New Deal. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez fired back a few days later. "For anyone who accuses us for instituting purity tests," she said, "it's called having values. It's called giving a damn."

Presumably, every Democratic primary voter has some core values that any candidate must at least nominally endorse to get their support. What makes one position a "value" and another a "purity test"? Given the confusion caused by this and other terms, and as an aid to the general public, here's a guide to centrist terminology.

The Centrist's Dictionary


Someone who presents a corporate-friendly agenda with less fervor than the typical Republican, with a modest measure of regulation as demanded by circumstances and with a patina of social liberalism.

"Choice" (when applied to a public good)

A word used as an attempt to distract people from the flawed state of the American social contract by forcing them to choose from an array of semi-functional, overpriced private-sector products. This allows policymakers to subsidize private corporations at public expense, while at the same time providing the public with something that loosely resembles -- but is not -- a functioning social safety net.

"Compete" (as in, "prepare workers of the future to compete")

A word used to describe what workers will be required to do to survive in the new, Randian economy. For example, to become competitive, workers are sometimes expected to run through a gauntlet of poorly conceived and insufficiently funded educational programs to re-train them for the "new economy" (defined below), often under the assumption that there is a secret app designer hiding inside every laid-off manufacturing employee. To "compete" after training, workers should be prepared to fight like crabs in a barrel for low-paying jobs that provide no employment security or benefits. (See also: "Jobs of the future," defined below.)

"Free stuff"

A term of contemptuous dismissal for public services that are commonly available in other developed countries, and which any decent society would make available to all human beings.

"Friend of mine" (as in, "John McCain was a friend of mine")

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4


Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Eskow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

2 people are discussing this page, with 2 comments

Thomas Brown

Become a Fan
Author 44937
(Member since Feb 9, 2010), 13 fans, 8 articles, 2 quicklinks, 577 comments, 11 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Excellent, excellent, excellent. Great tools for discussion.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jan 7, 2020 at 7:41:38 PM

  Recommend  (0+)

Walt Gelles

Become a Fan
Author 90594
(Member since Oct 30, 2013), 1 fan, 18 articles, 37 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Thank you for compiling this excellent lexicon worthy of Ambrose Bierce or the book Nukespeak.

Someone should compile a more general vocabulary covering the broad political spectrum. It might include words like:

regime - pejorative for any government that the U.S. dislikes and seeks to overthrow, by any means, legal or illegal

neoliberalism - confusing term that usually refers to IMF-imposed austerity inflicted by the US and the West on other nations along with stripping of their social welfare programs

climate change - catch-all phrase to replace the term "global warming" when the theory behind that became wobbly

democratic socialist - self-styled U.S. "democratic socialists" seek to modify the corporate capitalist system through limited wealth redistribution and other social programs, while basically leaving intact the gargantuan military/war budget and the Permanent War Economy and keeping the means of production privately owned

fine people, very fine people - descriptive referring to white supremacists, neo-Nazis, bigots, racists, neofascists, Ku Klux Klansmen, and other hatemongers, as defined by Donald Trump in his remarks about the Charlottesvile, Virginia "Unite The Right" rally in August 2017 which left three people dead and many injured.

y'know - interjection frequently used by pundits and talking heads in an attempt to win sympathy from the audience. Hillary Clinton says "y'know" countless times in every speech or interview; hence the annoying habit of repeatedly using this phrase is known as Clintonitis.

take a listen - dumbing-down phrase used by television newscasters (based on "take a look") to create a phony air of friendly intimacy.

Submitted on Tuesday, Jan 7, 2020 at 8:54:03 PM

  Recommend  (0+)