Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 25 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 9/10/12

The Presidential Debates, Why 3rd Party Candidates Can't Get In

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   4 comments
Message Dave Lefcourt
Become a Fan
  (21 fans)




(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA




Now with the two major party conventions relegated to the dustbin of history, just what can we expect politically these next two months?

Though maybe not on the radar for many in the U.S., the number one concern from here is, let's hope Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu can somehow be kept on a leash and prevented from attacking Iran.

A so called "October surprise" is not out of the question. "Bibi" is no fan of Obama and is known to be friends with Romney, seeing the latter more ideologically closer and a knee jerk supporter of Israel no matter what horrific policies that country carries out. A surprise Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear facilities would force Obama's hand in support of the Israeli's even if he disagreed with them. So Israel's possible military action on Iran remains a potentially dangerous, major game changer in this election.

Of course the economy and the stagnant jobs picture remains the #1 domestic issue on most peoples minds and traditionally has hurt the incumbent up for re-election. Then again, Mitt Romney's former connection as CEO of Bain Capital as a venture capitalist and corporate raider which resulted in a net loss of jobs in their corporate takeovers doesn't exactly bode well for his being a job creator and helping him to win in November.

Then there are the 3 upcoming presidential debates that reportedly draw some 60 million viewers to these affairs. Yet what's most noteworthy about these debates (and I suspect little known to most viewers) is the event organizers that control and run the debates known as the Commission on Presidential Debates (CPD).

The CPD began in 1987, after the League of Women Voters withdrew their previous sponsorship of the debates over the demands of the two major parties to control the debates structure and format which the League couldn't abide and believed was a danger to democracy. So in 1987, the two major parties came together to establish the way debates are run between the candidates for president. It was formed as a non profit corporation sponsored by private donations from foundations and corporations.

Though a non profit corporation, the CPD is solely controlled by the Democratic and Republican parties. It is headed by Frank Fahrenkopf, the former head of the Republican National Committee and Paul Kirk, the former head of the Democratic National Committee. Under their "leadership" they set a rule that a party to the debates has to garner at least 15% support across 5 major polls.

Under this ruling no 3 rd party challengers have been able to meet this criteria and been permitted to take part in the presidential debates. Thus the American people get to see and hear ONLY the candidates of the two major parties.

That ruling prevented Ralph Nader from participating in these debates in 2000, 2004 and 2008. It presumably is preventing the likes of Justice Party candidate Rocky Anderson from participating and presenting his views and ideas to the voting public.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   News 1   Funny 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Dave Lefcourt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend