Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

The "Non" Nuclear Security Summit

By       Message Dave Lefcourt       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It


Author 40828
- Advertisement -



Seoul Nuclear Security Summit

- Advertisement -



Right now we don't have a President of the United States. What we do have is a man running for re-election, who's every move, every statement is aimed at the voters in the U.S. to fend off criticism and separate himself from his Republican opposition.

- Advertisement -

Just take Obama's visit this past weekend to something called the "Nuclear Security Summit" in Seoul, South Korea.

To the leader of North Korea Kim Jong Un (who was not in attendance) Obama urged him to "have the courage" to step away from its nuclear weapons program while threatening "you can continue down the road you are on, but we know where that leads." This road would lead to "more broken dreams, more isolation and even more distance between the people of North Korea and the dignity and opportunity they deserve." He said China (North Korea's primary ally), was seemingly "turning a blind eye" and "trying to paper over" North Korea's provocation." The president is to meet with Chinese President Hu Jintao later today.

To the Iranian leadership he said, "time is short" to step away from developing a nuclear weapon.

On Sunday, Obama met with Turkish Prime Minister Tayyip Erdogan declaring themselves in agreement that Syrian President Bashir Assad should step down and discussed ways of getting non-lethal aid to Assad's opposition.

So what is one to make of Obama's trip to Asia at this time, the impact of his statements and just who they were intended for?

As to their effect on the leaders of North Korea, Iran and Syria his words were meaningless. North Korea and Iran have traveled their own path for decades and with different leadership, mostly in opposition to the U.S. and the sanctions we place on them. Assad clings to power in Syria, has Iran as an ally and China and Russia prevent the U.N. from authorizing any military intervention in Syria.

- Advertisement -

So Obama's sojourn to Asia and the words he uttered were really just for domestic consumption in the U.S.

He was "tough" with veiled threats to North Korea and Iran that keeps the Republicans at bay and accusing him of being weak on the nation's defense.

He was "presidential" using words like "courage, dignity and opportunity", words hardly expressed by any of his likely Republican opponents he'll face next November.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It



Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".