Power of Story Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

The 'New" Iraq Crisis And Lessons Unlearned

By   Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Roberts       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 6/12/14

Author 7008
Become a Fan
  (16 fans)
- Advertisement -
The neo-conservative, Right-Wing cabal in the Washington that contaminated the George W. Bush Administration with illusionary dreams of military glory and great-power hubris around the world has never apologized for its failed foreign and military policies. In the end the Iraq War cost America dearly in both lives and treasure.

Today, with another internal volatile war in Iraq, the same neo-conservative denizens of the Republican Party are once more beating the drums of war. From blaming President Obama for his "failure to lead" and others gleefully proclaiming that their political clairvoyance told them long ago this crisis would happen when US forced left Iraq, everybody is jockeying to make the evening news.

Indeed, the intellectual bankruptcy of the uber-right in the US government and its political myopia that only see national strife and unrest as solvable with an M-16 rifle or a cluster bomb, demonstrates that such approaches to foreign policy is naively simplistic at best and dangerous as worst.

The failure of United States military adventurism over the past 25 years is a chilling indictment and testament to simply seeing every foreign policy issue through the prism of a powerful military. Moreover, these weaknesses underscore the shortcomings and weakness of the imperial presidency.

- Advertisement -

President George W. Bush, his Vice President, Dick Chaney and Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, led the charge to war in both Iraq and Afghanistan. They created the political conditions and hostile international climate that have morphed into the present situation on the ground in Iraq today.

These conditions, the seeds of which were planted when Dick Chaney, George Bush and Donald Rumsfeld first laid eyes on Iraq's oil fields, were left to grow and hatch into a very dangerous situation that the United States cannot now ignore. The United States broke it and now they don't want to fix it.

These conditions, hitherto endorsed and touted by the neo-con elements in Washington, were never envisioned to inevitably lead to the probability that militants will successfully establish an Islamist mini-state straddling Syria and Iraq, the two most violent countries in the Middle East.

- Advertisement -

Should this happen then this new development will further destabilize the most unstable region in the world, drive the Israeli government to distraction, and become a new launching pad for terrorist strikes against the U.S. and other Western countries -- the very things that the United States and its allies used as the pretext to invade and stop in Iraq over 10 years ago.

While President Barack Obama cannot dodge complicity for the Iraqi debacle, the fact is that it was the warmongering trio of Bush, Chaney and Rumsfeld that created and laid the conditions for today's horrible state of affairs. Consider the following:

They launched an invasion of Iraq in 2003 under false pretenses.

They starved the invasion of boots on the ground while draining the vital post-9/11 war in Afghanistan of resources.

They created the conditions for a protracted Iraqi civil war by propping up Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite thug, while looking the other way as his "government" marginalized and persecuted the Sunni minority.

They tried to buy off Sunni militants by showering them with weapons, pickup trucks and televisions rather than demanding that Al-Maliki establish a genuine, inclusive coalition government.

- Advertisement -

Al-Maliki also undermined the combat readiness of the Iraqi Army by sacking well-trained and experienced top military officers, including generals, and replaced them but political military hacks that are loyal to him and not Iraq.

By keeping and maintaining a weak military Al-Maliki calculated that his political rule would not be challenged and he now controlled an armed force that he could use against his political opponents. A force that was and is ill prepared to fight the kind of insurgent war that now rages.

They helped crash the economy by giving the rich tax cuts while simultaneously fighting two wars.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

MICHAEL DERK ROBERTS Small Business Consultant, Editor, and Social Media & Communications Expert, New York Over the past 20 years I've been a top SMALL BUSINESS CONSULTANT and POLITICAL CAMPAIGN STRATEGIST in Brooklyn, New York, running (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Black History Is important

Wordsmiths And The Delusional

Blacks Killing Blacks

Black On Black Crime: A Critique

2014 FIFA World Cup: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly

GOP Sore Losers Brigade