Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 11 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

The Long Depression

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   2 comments
Message Richard Eskow
Become a Fan
  (15 fans)

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

Years ago I heard an old Irish politician tell a joke, in that brogue only old-time Irish politicians could pull off, about a prisoner who had his tonsils removed one December. The following December the prisoner had his adenoids taken out. A year later he was scheduled to have his appendix removed, but as they were wheeling him to the operation room the warden stopped him.

"Ah, no, ye don't, boyo," said the warden. "I think you're trying to escape."

We seem to be losing our economy the same way the prison was losing its prisoner: one vital organ at a time. And will all due respect to old Irish politicians, this evisceration is no joking matter. An increasing number of economists think it will lead to long-term misery. So, apparently, do a lot of investors.

Economist Brad DeLong looked at the probable long-term effects of our current downturn and concluded that it will cause as much damage as the Great Depression here at home -- and considerably more globally. DeLong says he then resolved to stop describing our current episode as the "Lesser Depression." But that leaves us without a name.

I suggest we call it the "Long Depression."

Why is it a "Depression"? As DeLong notes, the U.S. lost 180 percent of a year's total output during the 1930s' Great Depression. That depression came to an end when this country entered World War II. Barring a miracle (which nobody predicts), the current downturn won't end nearly as quickly. And, as DeLong notes, "There is no moral equivalent of war on the horizon."

DeLong estimates that total losses from the financial crisis of 2008 will come to 160 percent of a year's output, making our current downturn roughly equal to the Great Depression. And that's based on a national economy which is much larger than it was in 1929. DeLong estimates that total U.S. losses could be as much as 14 times larger than they were in the 1930s.

What's more, the Great Depression hit the United States the hardest, while this depression is more severe in other parts of the world. DeLong notes that his "friends in the Obama administration ... defend themselves ... by pointing out that the rest of the world is doing far worse." That has apparently become a reason for complacency, despite our grim conditions here at home.

Another reason for our political complacency lies in this depression's protracted nature. The Long Depression isn't hitting us all at once. Like the prisoner in the joke, it's taking pieces out of us over the course of years. That's allowed people to define previously unacceptable economic conditions as "The New Normal."

In earlier times it would have been politically impossible to tolerate our current rates of unemployment, underemployment, poverty and wage stagnation. But wage stagnation arose over a period of decades, while the other statistics have gradually faded into background noise for our political and media elites.

Of course, DeLong could be wrong. But Paul Krugman seems to agree with him, and responded to his piece by laying out the contours of Europe's depression. The markets agree with him too. As DeLong notes, yields on Treasury bonds strongly suggest that bond markets are pessimistic about the economy. So do the U.S. stock markets. And dollar exchange rates suggest that the global gloom is as profound as its domestic counterpart.

The pessimism is warranted:

The Long Depression is deep. The official unemployment rate is 7.7 percent, while the official U6 rate (which includes the under-employed) is 15.6 percent. An alternate methodology which includes long-term discouraged workers brings the figure up to 23 percent.

Nearly 50 million Americans lived below the poverty line as of the last census. And wealth inequality in the United States is higher than it is in Egypt.

The Long Depression is long. We've had abnormally high unemployment for four years now, and the numbers are still dismal.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Richard Eskow Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Host of 'The Breakdown,' Writer, and Senior Fellow, Campaign for America's Future

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

How to Fix the Fed: Dismiss Dimon, Boot the Bankers, and Can the Corporations

The Top 12 Political Fallacies of 2012

Pawn: The Real George Zimmerman Story

What America Would Look Like If Libertarians Got Their Way

"His Own Man's" Man: Jeb Bush and the Return of Wolfowitz

"F" The Bureaucracy! The White House Can Help Homeowners Right Now

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend