Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   3 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Key for Every Significant Problem and Issue We Face, Controlling the Political Agenda

By       Message Dave Lefcourt     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

- Advertisement -

United States Capital Building

- Advertisement -

On occasion, the corporate media (in this instance, the editorial section of today's New York Times) will cut through the fog and come right out and say it, "only a constitutional amendment can counter the misbegotten Supreme Court assertion that money is speech".

That "constitutional amendment" the Times editorial was referring to, is of course, overturning the Court's ruling in "Citizens United" which permitted an avalanche of big money to influence and overwhelm the electoral process.

In this recent election cycle alone, some $6 billion, much of it in secret donations from unknown sources, overwhelmed the electoral process in favor of those moneyed interests. And it didn't matter whether it was to underwrite the campaigns of Democrats or Republicans. The majority of those elected were backed by big money.

  It also didn't matter that the largesse coming from some deep pocketed donors backed a losing candidate. The overwhelming majority of those elected were backed by big moneyed contributors. Only in rare instances did those candidates who refused big moneyed donations win their elections (as happened with Independent Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont). If there is a bipartisan alignment that is unequivocal it is candidates from both major parties prostituting themselves and their integrity in taking the big bucks to win their elections.

- Advertisement -

Under the "Citizens United" ruling it's all legal and according to the majority on the Supreme Court namely Justice Anthony Kennedy who wrote the majority opinion, "The Court now concludes that independent expenditures, including those made by corporations, do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption and appearance of influence or access will not cause the electorate to lose faith in this democracy".

Admittedly, big money contaminating and corrupting the electoral process is a recurring theme of this writer and is not new to readers of this space. However, the redundancy seems necessary.

Regrettably, it takes repetition for some people to "connect the dots" that big money controls the electoral process, chooses who runs for office and the majority of those who ultimately win elections.

And that majority establishes the all important political agenda that proposes and enacts the laws and regulations, determines the oversight and enforcement that goes to the benefit of the big moneyed and special interests that underwrite the campaigns of those elected.

The simple fact remains those controlling that political agenda hold the key and determine the outcome of every significant problem and issue we face.    

To bring about real change you have to control the political agenda. That was the key failing of the occupy movement. It identified and vocalized the problems and issues but refused to accept getting control of the political agenda required getting money out of politics as the key element and focusing and demanding "Citizens United" be overturned, the electoral playing field be leveled and a majority of candidates not beholden to big money be elected to rectify the very problems and issues we face.

All the problems and issues we bemoan from climate change to war, from health care to financial regulation are all connected to who controls the political agenda.

- Advertisement -

The reality is one or two office holders, like a Bernie Sanders or a Dennis Kucinich, who have forsworn against taking big moneyed contributions, are not enough to offset the overwhelming majority of those elected who do; for they are the majority in office that control the political agenda.

We can't throw up our hands and say we're powerless or we don't care about politics. We can't become cynical and say it's no use.

We're a country and planet nearing the tipping point, possibly the point of no return with a climate crisis and environmental degradation making an unlivable planet.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon

Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

An Ominous Foreboding, Israel vs Iran

The Evolving Populist Political Rebellion in the Arab World

A Nuclear War Would Be Insane

The Rich Get Richer, the Poor Get Poorer, While the Middle Class Gets Decimated

CIA in the Crosshairs

Iran Offers 9 Point Plan to end Nuclear Crisis, U.S. "No thanks".