Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 6/26/19

The Hybrid War Against Iran

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     (# of views)   3 comments
Author 59593
Message Vijay Prashad
Become a Fan
  (3 fans)

From Smirking Chimp

Iran vs The United States
Iran vs The United States
(Image by YouTube, Channel: The Infographics Show)
  Details   DMCA
- Advertisement -

U.S. President Donald Trump sat in the White House and contemplated a war against Iran. His army had been sending surveillance aircraft along the Iranian coastline, teasing Iranian radar, which tracked these manned and unmanned planes as they skirted the 12 nautical mile limit of Iranian sovereignty. Last week, the United States had two planes alongside Iran's coast -- an unmanned Global Hawk drone and a manned P-8 spy plane.

Iranian air command radioed the U.S. forces to say that both the drone and the spy plane had come inside Iranian territory. The P-8 shifted course to leave Iranian airspace, while the Global Hawk continued. Iranian officials say that it was because the Global Hawk remained in Iranian airspace that it was shot down last Thursday morning at 4 a.m.

Trump and his team threatened to retaliate. They wanted to shoot at Iranian radar and anti-aircraft facilities. At the 11th hour, Trump said, he decided not to fire at Iranian targets. The Pentagon had warned him that this would threaten U.S. troops in the area. It was to protect these troops that Trump did not launch a strike.

- Advertisement -

Sanctions

Trump might not have sent in a suite of missiles to hit Iran last week, but the United States has -- of course -- already opened up a certain kind of war against Iran. A few days before the drone was shot down, the head of Iran's Supreme National Security Council -- Ali Shamkhani -- gave a talk in Ufa, Russia, on security matters. In his talk, Shamkhani said that the United States had squashed the sovereignty of a number of countries. The U.S. Treasury Department, he said, had become a kind of financial CentCom (Central Command). Shamkhani said that the policies pursued by the United States should be considered to be "economic terrorism."

U.S. unilateral sanctions are at the heart of this "economic terrorism." The United States is able to use sanctions as an effective instrument against other countries because it has such enormous power over the world financial and monetary system. The U.S. dollar is the main reserve currency and the main currency of international trade. Reliance upon the U.S. dollar and on U.S. financial systems means that most countries are unwilling to stand up against U.S. pressure.

- Advertisement -

Sanctions have meant that Iran -- reliant upon the export of oil and natural gas -- has seen its external revenues collapse. The domination by the United States over the world financial system -- including the international financial institutions (the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank) has meant that Iran has not been able to raise credit on the international market. Difficulty in importing medicines and food has produced grave challenges for the Iranian people.

Hybrid War

Since the Western media continues to set the terms of international understanding, Washington's interpretation of events around Iran predominates. Iran has never attacked the United States, but the U.S. has in fact intervened several times in Iran. In 1953, the U.S.with the UK -- overthrew the democratically elected government of Mohammed Mossadeq and over the course of the next two decades provided full support to the unpopular government of the shah of Iran. When the Gulf Arabs pushed Saddam Hussein to attack Iran in 1980, it was the U.S.and Western Europe -- that provided Iraq with arms and money for a bloody eight-year war. All of this context is lost to the Western media, which hyperventilate about fantasy stories such as Hezbollah in Venezuela or Iranian control over the Houthis. It is always Iran that is the aggressor, even when it has been Iran at the receiving end of U.S. aggression.

Iran is seen as the cause of the problem; the idea that Iran is a rogue or terrorist state is hard to shake off. This is part of the information war that Iran faces, unable -- even with a sophisticated foreign minister (Javad Zarif) to argue its case that it has not been belligerent, but it has been at the receiving end of threats and sanctions from Washington.

Between 2010 and 2012, four Iranian nuclear scientists were killed. These scientists -- Masoud Alimohammadi, Darioush Rezaeinejad, Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan and Majid Shahriariwere -- killed either by Israeli intelligence, the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) or U.S. intelligence, or some combination of all of them. These scientists were killed inside Iran, in broad daylight. It sent a chill through the scientific community. A U.S. and Israeli created computer worm -- Stuxnet -- hit Iranian computer systems in 2010, creating damage to Iran's computers that held part of its nuclear work. It was announced that more such attacks were possible. These took place before the nuclear deal was agreed upon in 2015. But the stench of such attacks remains.

Iran's minister of information and communications technology -- Mohammad Javad Azari Jahromi -- said that Iran has built a firewall that protects its facilities from any cyber-weapon thrown at it by the U.S. and Israel. This firewall is built by Iranian computer scientists.

- Advertisement -

It is this combination of attacks -- the sanctions, the information war, the sabotage -- that comprises the "hybrid war" against Iran (for more on the concept of "hybrid war," see the dossier on Venezuela from Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research). This hybrid war continues, with the threats of war as part of the arsenal wielded by Washington against Iran. Even Trump's statement that he withdrew the order to bomb Iran just minutes before the attack began is part of this information war, this attempt to terrify Iranians into the belief that the U.S. is dangerous enough to drop bombs at any time. The hybrid war tightens the noose around Iran.

Group Against Sanctions

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 2   Supported 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Vijay Prashad Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Vijay Prashad is the George and Martha Kellner Chair of South Asian History and Director of International Studies at Trinity College, Hartford, CT His most recent book, The Darker Nations: A People's History of the Third World, won the Muzaffar (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The South gathers in Tehran

The American Experiment Has Failed in Afghanistan

Why the Trump Administration Could Be America's Last

For All His Bluster, Trump is Powerless Against NATO Allies -- Here's Why

The World's Largest Humanitarian Crisis Is Basically Being Blacked Out by Western Media

Puerto Rico: Ruined Infrastructure and a Refugee Crisis

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments


Charles Homer

Become a Fan
Author 511996

(Member since Aug 27, 2018), 1 fan, 119 comments
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

Here is an article that looks at one key incident in Iranian history that the Western media seems to have conveniently forgotten:

click here

Iran knows that it stands alone when it comes to protecting itself from war.

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:52:44 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
Indent

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784

(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 38 fans, 1 articles, 13 quicklinks, 5198 comments
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


Reply to Charles Homer:   New Content

Interesting read. Thanks.

Submitted on Thursday, Jun 27, 2019 at 8:47:13 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Susan Lee Schwartz

Become a Fan
Author 40790

(Member since Oct 25, 2009), 24 fans, 17 articles, 3895 quicklinks, 7181 comments, 2 diaries
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in


Add this Page to Facebook! Submit to Twitter Share on LinkedIn Submit to Reddit


  New Content

this is a must read -- This man who wrote this isn MSM pundit.Steven Andreasen, director for defense policy and arms control on the National Security Council staff from 1993 to 2001, is a national security consultant. Think about what he sees:

Quietly and under a shadow of unease, the Trump administration is opening the door to U.S. resumption of underground nuclear explosive testing. Anyone familiar with the directive and the test-ban treaty negotiating record would understand how completely misleading this is. If the president follows his national security team into this dark room, it could shatter the 50-year international consensus behind preventing the spread of nuclear weapons and launch a new nuclear arms race. Why would the Trump administration seek to restart nuclear testing? In March, four Republican senators wrote the president asking whether he would consider "unsigning" the CTBT, calling the pact a "deeply flawed treaty that purports to ban all nuclear weapons tests." The seemingly out-of-the-blue letter from Republican senators and the DIA director's public remarks had the look of an orchestrated campaign .'

"More suspicious, someone in the Trump administration is leaking portions of the classified Clinton directive on activities not prohibited by the treaty, arguing the language "not all-inclusive, but illustrative" suggests uncertainty over the treaty's ban. Anyone familiar with the directive and the test-ban treaty negotiating record would understand how completely misleading this is.

"The CTBT balanced a ban on nuclear explosive testing with protecting the United States' ability to maintain the safety and reliability of its own nuclear stockpile. The treaty had the strong support of all national security agencies, Cabinet officials, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and our nuclear weapons laboratories a remarkable consensus and has underpinned the success of our nuclear weapon labs and their maintenance of our nuclear stockpile for more than 20 years.

"If the United States has evidence that nuclear-yield producing testing has been done by Russia, we should discuss it in the new strategic stability dialogue agreed to by President Trump and Russian President Vladi­mir Putin. We should reopen channels between our nuclear-weapons experts to discuss ways to build confidence that such tests are not happening. In the meantime, the United States has a robust nuclear deterrent. That deterrent would not be undermined by possible nuclear testing that the United States might fail to detect under the test-ban treaty.

"The move to "unsign" the CTBT could lead to more destructive nuclear capabilities in the hands of potential U.S. adversaries and be perceived by non-nuclear-weapon states as the ultimate "bait and switch" two decades after the Non-Proliferation Treaty was extended indefinitely. It would fuel uncertainty bordering on chaos for the future of nuclear nonproliferation. And it would generate controversy around our own weapons laboratories, which play a vital role in our security. It would be a high price to pay for fulfilling the dreams of those who seek to destroy another treaty."


Submitted on Thursday, Jun 27, 2019 at 4:45:29 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment