Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 10 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 7/18/21

The Guardian: Regurgitating the Russia-Gate Canard

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   3 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 2452
Message Ray McGovern
Become a Fan
  (175 fans)

This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

From Antiwar

Putin Puppet
Putin Puppet
(Image by FolsomNatural from flickr)
  Details   DMCA

The UK Guardian, and particularly Luke Harding, lead author of Thursday's Kremlin papers appear to show Putin's plot to put Trump in the White House, are heaping still more discredit on what was once a respectable newspaper. This long story (long in both senses of the word) regurgitates "what are assessed to be leaked Kremlin documents" and adds a bit of drama by quoting an ex-UK ambassador to Russia calling the documents "spell-binding."

The story is all too familiar; this time, however, we are supposed to believe the all-out effort to help Trump is enshrined in purloined "Kremlin papers," which are unbelievably (literally) prescient -- clairvoyant, actually. So much so, that they might have been written in the last month or two.

Harding and two other Guardian hired hands -- Julian Borger and Dan Sabbagh -- spin quite a tale about Putin ordering various Russian intelligence agencies to help an impulsive and "mentally unstable" Trump to become president. Now, whatever one thinks of Putin, it seems to me doubtful that he would go to extraordinary lengths to ensure that Russia would have to contend with a president of that kind of temperament with his fingers on the nuclear codes.

As for clairvoyance, the Guardian notes, with zero sense of embarrassment, "The papers appear to set out a route map for what actually happened in 2016." If there is such a thing as retrospective clairvoyance, it seems far more likely that Harding and co. extrapolated from events of more recent years to show how -- even then -- the Kremlin was out to force a "social explosion" to weaken the president. Sounds a lot like "sow seeds of distrust" which came into vogue a bit later.

And, if that were not enough, the purloined Kremlin papers add:

"There were international benefits from a Trump win, the Kremlin stresses. Putin would be able in clandestine fashion to dominate any US-Russia bilateral talks, to deconstruct the White House's negotiating position, and to pursue bold foreign policy initiatives on Russia's behalf."

Need more? As if to prove it has no shame, The Guardian echoes the now-totally discredited "Steele Dossier," which the Democrats paid for and which Democratic-friendly U.S. security services used to a fare-thee-well against Trump. Harding and his co-conspirators add darkly that:

"There is also apparent confirmation that the Kremlin possesses kompromat, or potentially compromising material, on the future president, collected -- the document says -- from Trump's earlier 'non-official visits to Russian Federation territory.'"

Nihil Obstat

Nihil Obstat: There is nothing to prevent The Guardian from regurgitating the old canard about the Russians hacking into the computers of the DNC to steal emails (which showed how the deck was stacked against Bernie Sanders), and then giving them to WikiLeaks to publish.

The Guardian feels free to breathe new life into that old canard without fear of contradiction: A matter of weeks after the security council meeting, GRU [Russian military intelligence] hackers raided the servers of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and subsequently released thousands of private emails in an attempt to hurt Clinton's election campaign.

Readers of The Guardian and other mainstream media have no way of knowing that the alleged Russian hacking of the DNC fable was long ago expressly refuted by the horse's mouth testimony of the head of the cyber firm, CrowdStrike, to whom the FBI deferred to investigate the DNC computers. That testimony by Shawn Henry was given on Dec. 5, 2017 to the House Intelligence Committee. It gave the lie to claims that there is technical evidence that Russia hacked the DNC emails that WikiLeaks published on July 22, 2016. Henry admitted under oath that there is no such evidence.

Welcome Confirmation

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Valuable 2   Must Read 1   News 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Ray McGovern Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army infantry/intelligence officer and then a CIA analyst for 27 years, and is now on the Steering Group of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS). His (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

What's Hayden Hidin'?

Asylum for Julian Assange -- Former Awardee for Integrity

Petraeus Cons Obama on Afghan War

Obama Stands Up to Israel, Tamps Down Iran War Threats

Note to Nancy Pelosi: Colin Powell Got Snookered at CIA, too

Mullen Wary of Israeli Attack on Iran

Comments Image Post Article Comment and Rate This Article

These discussions are not moderated. We rely on users to police themselves, and flag inappropriate comments and behavior. In accordance with our Guidelines and Policies, we reserve the right to remove any post at any time for any reason, and will restrict access of registered users who repeatedly violate our terms.

  • OpEdNews welcomes lively, CIVIL discourse. Personal attacks and/or hate speech are not tolerated and may result in banning.
  • Comments should relate to the content above. Irrelevant, off-topic comments are a distraction, and will be removed.
  • By submitting this comment, you agree to all OpEdNews rules, guidelines and policies.
          

Comment Here:   


You can enter 2000 characters.
Become a Premium Member Would you like to be able to enter longer comments? You can enter 10,000 characters with Leader Membership. Simply sign up for your Premium Membership and you can say much more. Plus you'll be able to do a lot more, too.

Please login or register. Afterwards, your comment will be published.
 

Username
Password

Forgot your password? Click here and we will send an email to the address you used when you registered.
First Name
Last Name

I am at least 16 years of age
(make sure username & password are filled in. Note that username must be an email address.)

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments  Post Comment


William WAUGH

Become a Fan
Author 505853
(Member since Jun 8, 2016), 101 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

My comment on the cited article in the Guardian was, "What are US intentions toward Russia?" I have not received a reply to date.

Submitted on Sunday, Jul 18, 2021 at 6:31:08 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Gregory Kozloff

Become a Fan
Author 82974
(Member since Oct 27, 2012), 8 fans, 253 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member and Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Not paid member and Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I cannot stand all this kaka re Russia. Do not get me wrong the Russkies aren't good guys no major country is but this anti-Russia stuff we spew is so undermining of our own character. Childish rehashing of old cold-war rhetoric by the new nazis of the 21st century (USA). And the Guardian just shows how far the UK has fallen too.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2021 at 2:23:50 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (1+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

Phillip Michaels

Become a Fan
Author 7136
(Member since Jul 30, 2007), 6 fans, 12 articles, 1 quicklinks, 211 comments, 1 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

Ray, I've read that former Pres. Trump still owes Deutsche Bank $300 million that he hasn't made any payments on since at least 2016. Also, it is clear that the exact current value of Mr. T.'s assets are unknown. Finally, the same department of Deutsche Bank that loaned him money has been convicted of money laundering for (likely) Russian Oligarchs. The questions are, and they should have been answer by Trump or his opponents long before now: 1) is Trump's net worth negative, 2) is the money owed to the bank controlled by Putin, 3) did Justice Kennedy's son (a manager at the Bank) have anything to do with this loan, and 4) is there any connection between Kennedy's resignation and Trump's loan from the bank?

So far as I know, this loan is the most obvious and well-documented link between Putin and Trump. The fact that these questions are unanswered suggests that this article's conclusion that accusations of Putin's control over Trump are merely a "conard" are premature.

Submitted on Wednesday, Jul 21, 2021 at 6:50:45 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
  Recommend  (0+)
Flag This
Share Comment More Sharing          
Commenter Blocking?

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment