Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 3/8/20

The Democratic Party On The Brink

Author 79840
Message Lawrence Davidson
Become a Fan
  (14 fans)

From To The Point Analyses

Can Bernie Sanders unite the Democratic Party?
Can Bernie Sanders unite the Democratic Party?
(Image by YouTube, Channel: Los Angeles Times)
  Details   DMCA

The failure to see the need to manage change, and instead adhere to a traditional and increasingly unresponsive status quo, is a formula for failure. Still, recognizing the need, and then managing it can be difficult. Here we will define managing change, admittedly rather vaguely, as addressing disaffection in a timely and enlightened way. The recent history of the Republican Party shows what happens when an institution fails to respond to discord in such a way. It may now be that the Democratic Party is following the same self-destructive path.

Part I -- Background: The Republicans Self-Destruct

The failure to manage change in the face of internal discord destroyed the Republican Party. In the year 2009 right-wing Tea Party rebels began taking over party positions at the state and local level. Simultaneously, the national party infrastructure started to slip from the hands of "moderates," or what used to be called Rockefeller Republicans. This set the scene for the eventual rise to power of autocratic and irrational leadership in the person of Donald Trump. At that point most of the "moderate" conservatives fled into the ranks of the independents. Trump proceeded to recruit their replacements from a right-wing amalgamation of racists, misogynists, conspiracy theorists, gun fanatics, and religious fundamentalists yearning for Armageddon. These are Hillary Clinton's "basket of deplorables" an accurate, if impolitic, label. At the national level, the "deplorables" marginalized the Tea Party advocates.

As if to prove this point, President Trump hosted 200 rightist media leaders at the White House on 11 July 2019. It was a who's who of boosters for the reworked, now radical Republican Party (a very different crowd from the post-Civil War element of the same name). What seemed to unite them all was the was the willingness to exploit the negative emotions and imagined grievances that collect over time within the boorish disaffected element of any population: hatred of "the other," anger at the "establishment," resentment of those less well-off than themselves (presumably because such folks take public assistance), jealousy of those better off then themselves, and a general feeling of alienation the cause of which they attribute to all of the above. Trump's accomplishment was to bring this ragtag group together under the banner of his ersatz Republican Party. Soon, the "deplorables" started to act like Eric Hoffer's True Believers.

Thanks to subsequent Democratic Party mistakes, these radical Republicans squeaked out a win in 2016 and took control of the federal government. We -- and by this I mean not only American citizens but also most of the rest of the planet -- have been living with the consequences ever since. For the sake of American democracy, the world climate crisis, and an assortment of other important issues, the crucial question is whether the Democratic Party can get it together to prevent Trump and his mercenary lot from staying in office. The answer to this question is uncertain.

Part II -- The Democratic Party and the Pressures for Change

While Trump was transforming the Republican Party for the worse, the Democratic leadership ignored the possibility that they too might be facing trouble. They missed the message that the disintegration of the Republican Party was caused by a failure to address emerging social pressures and demands. So, myopically assuming that the problems were solely Republican ones, the Democratic party leaders gave little thought to the demand for change coming from sections of their own voter base. But the problems were not just Republican ones. They were American problems that had split the country nearly in two.

The problems and pressures arose, in great part, from a culture war (which grew to encompass economic and political issues) that has been going on since the 1960s (see my analysis, A Culture War Against Tolerance). It had created powerful reactionary forces on the right that had now found a home in the new radical Republican Party. However, this same "war" generated a growing pool of progressives who found leaders in Senators Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren, both of whom have sought to move the Democratic Party to the left. This was the demand for change that the Democratic leadership was called upon to creatively manage.

To date, they have not done so. Instead they have decided to hold fast to tradition and meet the challenge of the upcoming 2020 election by sustaining the presidential candidacy of Joe Biden -- a mediocrity whose stated goal is to return the nation "back like we used to be" before Donald Trump's ascendancy. In other words, Biden is a status quo ante candidate. Instead of creatively managing change, Joe Biden's job is twofold: to defeat Trump and simultaneously shut down the progressive pressures impacting the Democratic Party.

Part III -- A Pivotal Choice for the Democrats

As the primary season plays itself out, the Democratic establishment, whether it cares to admit it or not, is slowly coming to face a pivotal choice. That choice has recently been set forth by the progressive leader Bernie Sanders. Let's lay this out point by point:

"In an interview with MSNBC host Rachel Maddow, Sen. Bernie Sanders said -- if former Vice President Joe Biden had a plurality of delegates entering the convention he should be the Democratic party's presidential nominee."

In other words, Sanders is asserting that the democratic principle of popular choice should guide the Democratic Party process of choosing a presidential candidate for the 2020 election.

If Biden proves to be the popular choice by winning a plurality of delegates in the party's various primary contests, then Sanders would step aside in Biden's favor. This is a significant compromise on Sanders's part and probably signals his recognition that, in 2020, the main object of the November election is to turn Trump out of office. It also means that if Biden legitimately wins the nomination, he will probably receive at least some progressive support.

Next Page  1  |  2


Rate It | View Ratings

Lawrence Davidson Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Lawrence Davidson is a history professor at West Chester University in Pennsylvania. He is the author of Foreign
Policy Inc.: Privatizing America's National Interest
; America's
Palestine: Popular and Offical Perceptions from Balfour to Israeli
; and Islamic Fundamentalism. His academic work is focused on the history of American foreign relations with the Middle East. He also teaches courses in the history of science and modern European intellectual history.

His blog To The Point Analyses now has its own Facebook page. Along with the analyses, the Facebook page will also have reviews, pictures, and other analogous material.

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Domestic Terrorism American Style -- An Analysis

Nationalism vs. Capitalism: Guess Which One Wins?

Who is Right in Syria?

Australia and the Fight for Justice in Palestine

More On Savage Israel -- An Analysis

Global Warming Revisited: Reality vs Republican Theology


The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 3 comments

Meredith Ramsay

Become a Fan
Author 7201
(Member since Aug 3, 2007), 1 articles, 10 quicklinks, 120 comments, 3 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I'm grateful to Professor Davidson for placing the current disintegration of the Democratic party in historical context, which the corporate media cannot and will not provide. His article is mercifully brief and cogent, which leaves room for further exposition of certain themes. As I read it, my mind was flooded with "Yes and...,. Yes and..., Yes and...." I hope he will continue to amplify on the divisive role of the mainstream media's so-called journalists who are presently working hand-in-glove with kingmakers in the deeply compromised Democratic Party, as well as the morally corrosive influence of power and money in American politics and culture. Lawrence Davidson writes in the tradition of Noam Chomsky, Maya Angelou, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Vaclav Havel and Czeslaw Milosz. What a pity that Larry Summers failed to appreciate the value of great public intellectuals when he fired Cornel West from the Harvard faculty.The world needs more of their kind.

Submitted on Monday, Mar 9, 2020 at 4:59:00 PM

  Recommend  (0+)

Lois Gagnon

Become a Fan
Author 61784
(Member since Mar 21, 2011), 42 fans, 1 articles, 15 quicklinks, 5549 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

The Democratic Party has not been and is not making "mistakes". Every move they make is quite deliberate in terms of their main goal which is serving the interests of the donor class. The party leaders know which side their bread is buttered on.

There is no chance what so ever the Dems will change their tactics in this election. They would rather run a dementia patient as their nominee than alienate their donor base even if it means 4 more years of Trump. Please let that sink in.

Submitted on Monday, Mar 9, 2020 at 9:26:04 PM

  Recommend  (2+)

Janet Supriano

Become a Fan
Author 90270
(Member since Oct 7, 2013), 13 fans, 2214 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Lois Gagnon:   New Content

Only totally flaccid puppets can be made to look real by the puppeteers. Biden's dementia is no problem because it doesn't matter. Trump is doing a fine job for them already. (annoying maybe, but a great instigator of all things detrimental)

Both puppets follow script onstage and fit easily into the carrying case. The masters fare well either way.

Submitted on Monday, Mar 9, 2020 at 10:27:01 PM

  Recommend  (2+)