Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

The Case For The Article V Convention

By       Message John De Herrera       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   7 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 3984
Become a Fan
  (2 fans)
- Advertisement -

Today, as happens once or twice a week, a blog post or news item appears on the Internet examining the Article V Convention. Below it are the same comments Americans have been making about a convention for over half a century: that it's dangerous, that with the way politics are played today such an assembly would be nothing more than special interests gutting protections originally put in place of, by, and for the people.

Many today understand the necessity for our society to build consensus about what's wrong (in order to do something about it), but few understand the function and utility of a convention. Nothing stays perfect forever, politics are dynamic, things change, and a scan of political sites makes clear popular consensus is that governance is off track. The question is, how do we address it?

A quick read of Article V (a single sentence) shows that upon the application of 2/3 of the states Congress shall call "a convention for proposing amendments"." The leading national group Friends of the Article V Convention has done an audit of Congressional Records (themselves part of the Constitution, as the Constitution mandates both houses keep them). They show that not only have 34 states cast the requisite number of applications to initiate the call, but indeed 49 have cast over 750 applications.

In other words the states have satisfied the clause. Congress simply ignores its obligation to count them, all the while two or three new ones arrive each new session.

- Advertisement -

The reason the 113th Congress is allowed to disobey the law is because the people are unaware and/or fear a convention. So long as this state of affairs exists, Congress can simply ignore the record while looking busy with a bunch of partisan and divisive nonsense, i.e. politics as usual.

90% Disapprove of Congress

What's more powerful, the right to complain about government, or the right to reform it? Clearly one right is more powerful. Indeed it's the right that makes an American citizen who and what they are--a member of a society with the power to alter or abolish what it dislikes about government. You'll find very few Americans who want to abolish government, the three branches--legislative, executive, and judicial. No, the vast majority want to keep what we have, but address and alter how it currently operates.

- Advertisement -

Opinion polls show that 90%+ of Americans disapprove of Congress, a statistic that's been trending for over a decade. When the institution established to represent the will of the People is disapproved by 90%, it's self-evident it's time for them to exercise their right to alter what they dislike. History teaches that if not, forces of corruption will alter it against our wishes, and some argue that's already occurring due to corporations acting as citizens. This status quo of politics has resulted in government drowned in private money, where laws/loopholes go to the highest bidders, written by lobbyists, signed off on by members of Congress, and disliked by the People.

The Provisions of Article V

In the event Congress becomes unresponsive to the needs of the people a convention of the states considers amendment proposals. Proposals voted up by 2/3 of state delegations are then sent back to the people at large for ratification by 3/4. In other words, the functions of proposal and ratification are two separate functions. The fear of a convention comes from the misperception that proposal and ratification are both executed at the convention, when in actuality the former is done by delegates and the latter by the people.

Seventy-five percent of Americans today are not going to suggest we chuck the Constitution and try to start over. But they are likely to support the reversal of Supreme Court doctrines regarding speech and personhood, even, perhaps, public financing of elections.

Forcing Congress to Act

There are a number of things about American history that politicians do not talk about, not because they don't want to, but because they can't, but because doing so would alter how we citizens see and think about our government. On the flip side, if enough of us become cognizant and desirous of reform, politicians will have no choice but to comply.

- Advertisement -

A paper put out by the Congressional Research Service (subsequently updated multiple times, most recently April 2014) says as much about the Article V Convention--that if enough Americans want it Congress will have to call it. That the paper has been updated since it was first delivered to Congress is significant: it means there is movement in the halls of power. Congress may not be talking about it, but they are clearly aware of the growing interest in Article V--and the negative and false myths surrounding it.

American Citizen or Global Citizen

Even if you're not American, it's important to understand and educate yourself about this issue--the one upon which all others rest. Unless we're talking about a different Earth, a different global order, a different USA, and a different Constitution, there is no other way out for humanity. In this sense, the Article V Convention is unique--once called, it sets off a natural progression of events that delivers us from the inevitable catastrophe of corporate governance.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Writer/artist/activist from California, with a degree in Creative Studies from the University of California at Santa Barbara. Advocating for the convention clause of Article V since 2001.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Patricia Arquette & Chuck Norris Engaged

Radiant and Piercing

Hamlet 3:2

Hamlet 5:2

Note to Naomi Wolf

Short Playscript On Torture