Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts    H4'ed 8/8/09

The Atomic Bombings, With Reference to American Historical Scholarship Regarding Them Since August 9, 1945

By       (Page 1 of 4 pages)   4 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.

On August 6, 1945, the United States Army Air Force dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, and three days later on August 9, 1945, the USAAF dropped another atomic bomb on Nagasaki, Japan. The death and destruction these two bombs wrought was immense, but it was no greater than the death and destruction previously wrought by the aerial fire-bombings of Germany and the Japanese mainland by the Allies in 1944 and 1945. What was new about the atomic bombings was that a single bomb caused so much damage and loss of life, and it could (obviously) be delivered by a single airplane. It was also suspected that missiles of the type developed late in the war by Germany would be capable of delivering atomic bombs to their targets in the near future.

The atomic bombings of Japan were followed almost immediately by her surrender and the end of World War II, and for twenty years there was a consensus among American historians that the bombings were necessary to cause Japan's surrender without an invasion of the Japanese mainland by American troops, an invasion that the American military predicted would result in hundreds of thousands of American dead and wounded.

But in the late 1960's, a school of "revisionist" historians arose, who argued that: (1) by July, 1945, Japan's surrender was immanent; and, (2) the atomic bombings were not necessary to obtain Japan's surrender on the same terms as actually obtained after the bombings, and this was known by the American government on August 6, 1945; and yet, (3) in order to convince the USSR both that America had the military might to oppose expansion by the Soviets anywhere in the world (and especially in Western Europe) - and to convince the USSR that America was prepared to use atomic bombs against her - the United States dropped the two atomic bombs on Japan.

The dean of this revisionist school of the history of the atomic bombings is Gar Alperovitz, Lionel R. Bauman Professor of Political Economy at the University of Maryland, in College Park, Maryland.*


(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

It is less clear who is dean of the American school of traditional history regarding the necessity of dropping the two nuclear bombs on Japan in order to end the war without an American invasion of mainland Japan, but certainly a good candidate is John Lewis Gaddis, Robert A. Lovett Professor of Military and Naval History at YaleUniversity.**


I strongly side with Gar Alperovitz and the revisionist school, but as almost 65 years of American hegemony in the world draws to a close, these arguments over its beginnings seem increasingly irrelevant. In this article I try to say something new with pictures, since pictures may be worth several words per pixel, and to say something which can best be brought home by the article's pictures. To wit, the use of atomic bombs can end all human life on the planet earth, and it must be brought under international control before it does so.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Rate It | View Ratings

GL Rowsey Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

"How could I fail to speak with difficulty? I have new things to say." I graduated from Stanford Law School in 1966 but have never practiced. Instead, I dropped back five years and joined The Movement, but it wasn't until the 1970's that I (more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Atomic Bombings, With Reference to American Historical Scholarship Regarding Them Since August 9, 1945

Alex S. MacLean, Possibly the Finest Low-Altitude Aerial Photographer in the World

Ten Images by Four Giants of Twentieth Century Art – Picasso, Miro, Magritte, and Chagall

Black-and-White Photographs From Nicholas Nixon's Brown Sisters Series

Mediated Knowledge Displayed As If It Were a Landscape: Eleven Works by Vic Muniz

Cityscapes in Oil – Seven Portraits of New York and San Francisco, by Richard Estes

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: