After the New York Times revealed that New York State Police had contacted an alleged victim of abuse by one of Governor David Paterson's aides while she was seeking a restraining order, Paterson immediately called for investigations by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and State Police Superintendent Harry Corbitt.
Paterson was apparently shocked to learn of the details recounted in the Times, since just last week, he said he had "looked into" that matter and found no cause for concern. Following the appearance of the Times article, however, Paterson suspended long-time aide David Johnson who (allegedly) ripped the clothes off of his partner, choked her, and prevented her from calling police.
Of course, one focus for such an investigation will be Paterson's contacting the alleged victim himself the day before a scheduled hearing in the case, a hearing she did not attend, leading to a dismissal. Although he originally said the woman called him, it turns out that one of Paterson's assistants first contacted the woman and instructed her to call him.
The same day that the article appeared, the cabinet member who supervises the state police force, Denise O'Donnell, resigned, indicating that the situation was intolerable. Particularly offensive to her was her claim that Superintendent Corbitt misrepresented the facts when he told her that the state police had no role in the matter.
When we hear the words "Cuomo Investigation of State Police Political Involvement," does it ring a bell? Well, let's see. In July 2007, Cuomo issued a scathing report on then-governor Eliot Spitzer's misuse of the state police to report on his political opponent, Joe Bruno.
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).