Power of Story
Send a Tweet        
- Advertisement -

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 1 Share on Facebook 1 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend 13 (17 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   2 comments
General News

Taser Death Still Festers in Vermont

By       Message William Boardman     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 7 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...) Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 14586
Become a Fan
  (29 fans)
- Advertisement -

 

AG USES SECRET REPORTS, PUBLIC EVASIONS TO JUSTIFY NON-PROSECUTION 

 

- Advertisement -

   By William Boardman  Email address removed  


Taser victim MacAdam Lee Mason, born Feb. 1973
(Image by macadammasonart)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

- Advertisement -

When the Attorney General of Vermont decided not to prosecute a Vermont State trooper who used a taser to kill an unarmed, 39-year-old epileptic artist, few Vermonters were surprised, most of the Vermont media managed to get the story partly wrong -- and none of the media took note of clear falsification in the AG's press release describing his decision. 

 

AG William Sorrell, 65, issued a carefully written release on Friday, January 25, announcing that "criminal charges should not be filed" against Trooper David Shaffer, 29, who used his taser to kill Macadam Mason, 39, on June 20, 2012, at his home in Thetford.   Sorrell's press release indicated that he and a county prosecutor had "completed independent reviews" of the fatal "incident," but it did not explain their conclusion beyond saying, in summary:

 

"The review was solely to determine whether criminal charges should be pursued against Trooper David Shaffer".   In a criminal case, the State bears the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the officer's use of force was unreasonable under the facts and circumstances of the case.

 

- Advertisement -

In other words, the prosecutors seem to imply, the trooper may or may not be actually guilty, but they don't think they have enough evidence to make a conviction a sure thing.  But they do not explain why they think that.  

 

Although the "reviews" were done by the prosecutors' separate offices, the actual investigation of the Vermont State trooper was done by the Vermont State Police itself.  There has been no independent investigation by any other official entity.

 

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   News 1   Supported 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Vermonter living in Woodstock: elected to five terms (served 20 years) as side judge (sitting in Superior, Family, and Small Claims Courts); public radio producer, "The Panther Program" -- nationally distributed, three albums (at CD Baby), some (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Nuclear Perceptions Fight Reality

Fukushima Spiking All of a Sudden

Fukushima Meltdowns: Global Denial At Work

Vermont Asks: "What the Fukushima"?

Military-Industrial Complex Owns Vermont

Accountability in Vermont?