Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 17 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 11/6/11

Tar Sands Song, Video, Action

Author 3678
Message Diane Perlman
On November 6, 2011, exactly one year before the 2012 US presidential elections, thousands of people will surround the White House to inspire President Obama to vote against the Keystone XL Pipeline. 
Over a period of 2 weeks in August - September, 2011, daily vigils were held in front of the White House, encouraging President Obama to vote against the dangerous Keystone XL Pipeline from Alberta Tar Sands. This strategy was initiated by  Bill McKibben,  author, educator,  environmentalist, and founder of, Over the 2 weeks, , 1252 people were arrested in front of the White House, including me (fist arrest)  and 5 members of Psychologists for Social Responsibility.  Leading environmental scientist James Hansen, who was also arrested, claims that this pipeline and extracting Tar Sands would be "Game Over" for the environment. 
Let's do our part to make it easier for President Obama to vote against the pipeline. He is receiving much pressure to vote for it. At a DC Rally on October 7, pastoral leader Rose Marie Berger said that if Obama voted for the pipeline, he would "have holy hell to pay," as ministers would sit in front of bulldozers to stop them. Of course, if he votes against the pipeline, the oil companies and other vested interests will give him hell. Frequent ads on TV mislead the public.  They deceive the public regarding jobs and strange Orwellian  remarks about how tar sands oil is like other oils . Let's educate ourselves to demystify the public and build strong support before he votes. 
These ads appear on Comedy Central's The Daily Show, MSNBC's Chris Matthews, Rachel Maddow, and Lawrence O'Donnell and likely other stations. Please call and send in emails to these shows asking that they REPORT on the pipeline and do stories on this, as the topic is consistent with the kind of subjects they do best.
Below are words to an educational song. The song is performed with a slide show on . Following the song, an excellent, informative article below by Dr. Trudy Bond,  friend and colleague from Psychologists for Social Responsibility  (Check our website,

Tar Sand Song - by DIane Perlman, 9/11/11

Dedicated to my grandtwins,  Neima and Neli, born 9/15/10, their cohorts and their descendants

The content inspired from learnings from Bill McKibben, James Hansen, Naiomi Klein, Native residents and chiefs from Alberta who visited DC, and the youth of the world who appeared at the UN Conference on Climate Change, the Klima Forum and all over the streets of Copenhagen in December 2009, 

This song is meant to be educational

To "This Land is Your Land" by Woody Guthrie

This land has tar sand

They have a grand plan

When they extract it

They unleash carbon

And release toxins into the water

Tar sands must stay for you and me


The land has natives.

What is their fate if

We give them cancer?

What is your answer?

And when we mine it

We wreck the climate

Tar sands must stay for you and me


They tell us oil's 

For our enjoyment

and the pipeline 

Will bring employment

This industry robs 

From many more clean jobs

Let's hire more for you and me


Marsela has shale

Our shale's not for sale 

You frack out gases

Make sick the masses

Puts poison fire into the water

Our shale must stay for you and me


For mountain top coal

They're selling our soul

Unto the devil

Each time they level

Coal cannot be clean

Deception is so mean

This coal must stay for you and me


Obsessed with fracking

and with extracting

Cause our addiction

is an affliction 

Will legislature 

Protect our nature?

And will they vote for you and me?


This land's not our land

It's for our children

for future life forms

the earth is too warm

We must preserve it 

'cause they deserve it

Three fifty (350) parts per mil for them
Disaster Capitalism at the Local Level
Tar Sands to Toledo II

The system counts on you to believe that you're powerless, but nobody is enslaved until he or she buys into it.  The first step is knowledge. The second is resistance.  Resistance is still possible in this police state, but no one can say for how long.  To block Exxon in this deal is to start breaking chains.- Lanny Colter and Paul Edwards, ClassWarFilms

The two-week-long protest in front of the White House, urging Obama by way of civil disobedience, to refuse the creation of the Keystone XL pipeline was indeed the largest environmental protest ever seen. Over 1250 people were arrested to protest the escalation of this human-made disaster, which would carry the oil from the tar sands of Alberta's Boreal Forest to the southern tip of the United States, with extensions  of the pipeline along the way.

Barack Obama can, of his own accord, veto this tragedy that is playing out on the North American continent. Or he alone can permit this travesty of our earth.  As a  primer by way of Josh Fox, for those who have had their heads buried in the (tar) sand:

  Tar sands or oil sands development is one of the dirtiest and most contaminating processes of oil development ever known in history.

   Canada's Boreal Forest, in Alberta, Canada, home of the tar sands, is one of the largest and last pristine forests in the world. It is being destroyed acre by acre, mile by mile, day after day. The industry admits that the damage will be irreversible.

  The oil is stuck in tar sands, it has to be mined out of the ground, squeezed and boiled.

    The tar sands uses more water than a city of 2 million people.

    The tar sands produces an unbelievable 36 million tons of carbon dioxide per day.

  It causes as much green house gas per day as 1.3 million cars.

  To produce oil from the tar sands huge quantities of natural gas has to be used.  In 2007 alone, the tar sands used about 1 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day, gas in many cases that was obtained by fracking.

  Wastewater is stored in toxic ponds so big that you can see them from outer space. The toxic lakes leak 11 million liters of toxic water a day into ground water and into nearby rivers used as drinking sources for the local communities.

image from video

In spite of these documented environmental tragedies and ongoing protests, it is a safe bet that Barack will sign off on the pipeline.  A look at supposed "progressives"in the Democratic Party reveals why it is so easy for him to do so: the Democrats have no widely-shared understanding of the threat of climate change and the portents of their disastrous energy policies.  Take ostensibly liberal Marcy Kaptur of Ohio's Ninth District (Toledo) as an example. Kaptur has proclaimed:  Continentally, the Alberta sands deposits hold vast potential to yield new reserves as large as two Gulfs of Mexico. This is likely to mean substantial jobs and economic development in our community for many years to come, ignoring that the synthetic heavy crude produced from tar sands is laden with more toxics than conventional oil.  Communities (like Toledo) adjacent to tar sands oil refineries face increased carbon dioxide emissions, and increased exposure to heavy metals, and sulfurs.

There are currently 16 states  with refineries equipped to process tar sands oil, and the BP refinery outside Toledo is one of those. Ms. Kaptur has said that she is . . . extremely pleased with the announcement that BP has given the green light for the Sunrise project in Alberta.  This in spite of the fact her statement came shortly after the Deep Water Horizon disaster, and eight months after the U.S. Department of Labor OSHA proposed more than $3 million in fines for 42 violations of employee safety at the BP/Toledo refinery. Ms. Kaptur is not an uninformed representative.  In protesting the NAFTA Super Highway in 2008, she blasted the foreigners :  They are so filthy rich!   Meanwhile, ExxonMobil, the producer of the tar sands oil, ripped off a record $40 billion in quarterly profits during a depression while millions of American lost jobs and homes, as cited by Lanny Colter and Paul Edwards in their hard-hitting video Stop the Megaloads Now!  Can you repeat, Ms. Kaptur,  filthy rich?  $40 billion in one quarter?  Exxon.  BP.  Tar Sands.

Colter and Edwards do not mince words when it comes to the actions of the people and their elected representatives:

What about American states helping promote the dirtiest oil extraction in the world? . . . Maybe you don't care about dirty oil extraction or destruction of a natural ecosystem.

What about States assisting the biggest contributor to rapid climate change on the planet? . . . Maybe you don't care about CO2 pollution.  Maybe you don't believe in global warming.

Well, if not, you better ask yourself what would trouble you.  How much arrogant contempt for you and your world would it take to make you fight back?

What would it take, Ms. Kaptur, for you to criticize BP for the refinery in your district that is currently being retrofitted to process oil from the tar sands?  For you to hold BP responsible for this environmental raping as you did for the Deep Water Horizon disaster?

Repeated requests by the author for a comment from Ms. Kaptur regarding the Keystone XL pipeline were brushed off with a statement that she had voted against expediting the review of the Keystone XL pipeline.  Voting with the democratic bloc against rather meaningless republican legislation is not a statement, and no further statement was forthcoming.

Not only are civil disobedience and large protests necessary in DC.  Local representatives and senators who allow the processing of the tar sands oil in our communities, toxic sludge brought in by dangerous pipelines, must be lobbied and held accountable for their positions.  Ms. Kaptur must be held accountable to her description of herself as a strong advocate of environmental responsibility and policies,- -- if she is to be considered a politician with any integrity.

* I know  they don't really exist.   

Dr. Trudy Bond is a psychologist who has lived in Toledo, Ohio for 34 years.  She attended fundraisers and supported Ms. Kaptur the first year she ran for Congress.  She can be reached at Email address removed.


Rate It | View Ratings

Diane Perlman Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Visiting Scholar Institute of Conflict Analysis and Resolution George Mason University

Diane Perlman is a clinical and political psychologist, devoted to applying knowledge from psychology, conflict studies and social sciences to designing strategies and policies to reverse nuclear proliferation, to drastically reduce (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Letter to President Obama from Conflict Analysis Professionals for Enduring Security

Open Letter to Pastor Rick Warren on Evil

The Second Democratic Debate: Unfair, Unbalanced, Media Malpractice

Presidential Paradigm Shift: "Join the Evolution"

The Psychology of Splitting and Traumatizing Families

Pressuring Iran: Self Fulfilling Paranoia and the Law of Opposites

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: