Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   8 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

THE OBAMATHON HAS BEGUN: How Long Will The Honeymoon Last?

By       Message Danny Schechter     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 1/22/09

- Advertisement -

THE OBAMATHON HAS BEGUN: How Long Will The Honeymoon Last?

By Danny Schechter

- Advertisement -

Every President has a honeymoon but Barack Obama’s won’t last long, probably because the real world won’t give him a pass. The markets showed their lack of sentimentality by dropping sharply on inauguration day. The Repugs are looking to knock off a Cabinet nominee, and do anything they can to show they are still a force to be dealt with

In truth,  indeed they are. 48% of the country did not support Obama. He knows that and hence his symbolic attempts to neutralize his opponents with smiles and civility, a preacher at the ceremony, and a few Cabinet positions. Will that assuage the hard right “movement activists,” the Limbaugh ditto heads or the Hannity hard heads?

I doubt it, but for now, they are on the defensive. Bill Clinton says he thinks the days of ideology are waning, that the polarization of the past will go away because the right has to become more pragmatic to return to power.

I don’t buy his consensus of the center viewpoint for several reasons.

- Advertisement -

The right radio heads and Foxoids don’t go venomous because they believe their rants. They do it to build audience among disaffected wingers and whiners. It’s a marketing tactic, not necessary an act of conviction. Posturing fuels controversy; controversy builds anger and audience. They need this strategy to stay in business, just as tabloid journalism needs sensation and trivia to sell newspapers or build ratings.

So, don’t bank on an abandonment of “childish things,” as Barack Obama characterized the political wars in his inaugural speech. The haters don’t hate losing as much as they hate declines in revenues. It is a business, an industry that needs to sell as much as tell. That’s why Ann Coulter is always taking provocative and outrageous stances. That gets her on the air and sells books. She tries to look hot, but its hot buttons she looks for.

If ideology on the right is not going anywhere, ideology on the left is also here to stay—and sometimes pay.

The fact of the matter is that our system is collapsing. The bank bailouts and interest rate cuts didn’t work. Unemployment will rise and companies will fall. As that happens,  disatisfaction, anger and outrage will build. The Pentagon’s plans to contain civil unrest is based, in part, on that expectation.

Obama may be pushing the envelope in the center but he is, as I quote him in my book Plunder, “a free market guy.” Yet he knows or should know that a couple of after the fact regulations and quickie stimulus plans are unlikely to arrest the structural decline.

Bear in mind that what we are up against is not just a credit crisis but a crisis of capitalism itself. There I said it! That means we have to look behind the daily machinations of the markets.

What bubble will go next? Credit cards? Pension funds? Cedit debt swaps? Already the government uis $11 trillion in debt. There have been $3.6 trillion in credit losses Add in $3 trillion in war costs tend and soon your are talking about real money and real pain.

- Advertisement -

The government must act and will act but the conservatives who point out that it took the New Deal YEARS to work, and then took a world war to save the system are not totally wrong. Simply trying to revive or reform a corrupt system does not make for change, nor does it promise the kind of economic transformation we need.

The Obama speech said the right things about Greed but then puttered off into a vaguer indictment of all of us. He may be right but if everyone is to blame, no one is to blame and then what?

Our media goes on with daily reportage but the breaking news is not breaking any new ground in helping us understand the depth of the problems we are up against.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

News Dissector Danny Schechter is blogger in chief at Mediachannel.Org He is the author of PLUNDER: Investigating Our Economic Calamity (Cosimo Books) available at Amazon.com. See Newsdisssector.org/store.htm.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel Gives All Jews A Bad Name

Is There A Threat of Fascism in the USA?

Free Marketers Going After Occupy Wall Street --Danny Schechter

COG OR COA: WHY IS OBAMA MORPHING INTO BUSH 2?

WHO OWNS OUR MEDIA AND WHY IT MATTERS

WERE THE BANKS TOO BIG TO FAIL OR THE BANKERS TOO BIG TO JAIL?