Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 11 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 3/17/20

Sunday Night's Debate Failed the Coronavirus Test

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   1 comment
Author 29155
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Nichols
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

From The Nation

Biden and Sanders should have stolen a page from Andrew Yang and promised to give money to hard-hit Americans.

Biden and Sanders at the debate
Biden and Sanders at the debate
(Image by YouTube, Channel: POLITICO)
  Details   DMCA

Moments after the first one-on-one debate of the 2020 Democratic presidential race concluded Sunday night, CNN flipped from the candidates to Dr. Sanjay Gupta for an update on the coronavirus outbreak.

While the cable networks can usually be faulted for their lack of perspective, CNN got that call right. What the network's chief medical correspondent had to say about the pandemic was, undoubtedly, of more interest to more Americans than what the candidates had just argued about.

That's not because Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders didn't speak to weighty subjects in one of the more issue-oriented debates of the 2020 race. The problem was that too many of the discussion points -- including an extended examination of what Sanders said about the late Cuban President Fidel Castro and the Nicaraguan Sandinistas in the 1980s -- veered off-topic on a night when cities and states were ordering schools, bars, and restaurants to close.

America had some very specific concerns on Sunday night. The most-discussed social media post was a desperate call from Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker: "The federal government needs to get its s@#t together. NOW." Panic buying was hitting warp drive. The Federal Reserve was announcing that it would slash interest rates to zero in an emergency effort to sustain the economy. Yet, stock market futures were tanking.

Biden, who is now the leader in the race for the Democratic nomination, and Sanders, who is the last serious challenger to Biden, addressed the pandemic in their opening statements and early remarks. But neither spoke so ably Sunday night as they had in pronouncements last week with regard to the burgeoning crisis.

Nothing Biden said Sunday was as pointed as his charge on Thursday that "labeling COVID-19 a foreign virus does not displace accountability for the misjudgments that have been taken thus far by the Trump administration."

Nothing that Sanders said was so poignant as his pre-debate declaration:

"Now is the time for solidarity. We must fight with love and compassion for those most vulnerable to the effects of this pandemic.

"If our neighbor or co-worker gets sick, we have the potential to get sick. If our neighbors lose their jobs, then our local economies suffer, and we may lose our jobs. If doctors and nurses do not have the equipment and staffing capacity they need now, people we know and love may die."

During the debate, the candidates restated their views on President Trump's failure to address the crisis and outlined their own proposed responses -- with Biden more focused on immediate issues and Sanders bringing up structural concerns. They then followed the CNN and Univision moderators down the primrose path of past debate topics -- wasting away an hour and a half on issues that had already been addressed and predictable disagreements between the democratic socialist who is winning the ideas primary and the centrist who has won most of the actual primaries.

The candidates gave the coronavirus debate too little time and, even when they were discussing issues such as bankruptcy law, they failed to circle back to the topic with which most Americans are justifiably obsessed.

Both Sanders and Biden had opportunities to seize the moment by making bold proposals for immediate action. Both could have pushed the debate to places that would have made voters perk up and want to hear more. But they never quite got there.

If only one -- or even both -- of them had stolen a page from Andrew Yang, the entrepreneur and author who bid for the 2020 Democratic nomination as an advocate for a universal basic income (UBI) scheme that would give every American $1,000 a month. On Sunday, the former candidate was saying more than the current candidates about the consequences of locking down the US economy.

"This threatens to be worse than the financial collapse of 2008. The meltdown didn't cause people to stay home, cancel mass gatherings and travel and shut down schools for weeks/months," Yang warned on Twitter. "There needs to be a stimulus at an economy-wide scale to avoid the real chance of a depression."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

John Nichols Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written the Online Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Paul Ryan? Seriously?

Scott Walker's Austerity Agenda Yields 'Worst Job Losses in US'

What the Hell Is Wrong With Paul Ryan?

The Koch Brothers, ALEC and the Savage Assault on Democracy

GM's Plant Closures Confirm the President is a Liar and a Fool

The Deafening Silence of the Republican Field in the Wake of the Planned Parenthood Shooting

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

1 people are discussing this page, with 1 comments


Meryl Ann Butler

Become a Fan Follow Me on Twitter (Member since Jun 5, 2006), 81 fans, 668 articles, 2013 quicklinks, 6100 comments, 7 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

I agree, this should have been the most focused and memorable debate, it wasn't.

Submitted on Wednesday, Mar 18, 2020 at 2:22:00 PM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help