Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook 4 Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   6 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Subsidizing Big Pork

By       Message Suzana Megles     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H4 8/17/15

Author 10457
- Advertisement -
From flickr.com/photos/56112382@N08/6721761557/: Pig in barn
Pig in barn
(Image by wattpublishing)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Recently, I wrote in behalf of the activities of the Humane Society of the US in part because another supposed animal rights group from California was trying to discredit them. But here again in this post is evidence that the HSUS tirelessly works to either alleviate animal suffering or, as in this case, to rectify the unwise use of tax payers money to promote animal products
- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -
Today -when I read about the 60 million dollar revenue stream being disbursed to the special interests of the pork industry- I was shocked and dismayed. This was brought to light by the case HSUS recently brought to court.
I have been reading about concerns that because the Baby Boomer Generation had not had as many children as previous generations- that less money has been added into the payroll tax deductions which funds Social Security. There is real concern that by 2030 there won't be enough money to pay Social Security benefits to retirees then. Instead of subsidizing the pork industry, those millions of dollars would be better set aside in Social
Security coffers to offset this dire prediction of a short fall in 2030. But this is truly a joke too- when just this morning I read that we are close to 17 trillion dollars in debt. Did I read right? If so, there is NO money to be set aside for this purpose.
- Advertisement -
But of course -even more importantly -why are we disbursing millions of dollars to the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) in the first place? Pacelle notes that "Even in Washington, where millions of dollars are disbursed to influence public policy, ....the schemes of the pork industry to divert public money to special interest lobbying efforts may be unequaled."
And perhaps which is even more disheartening -- these funds are not being used to better the lives of these poor pigs incarcerated in the cruel CAFOs. The mother pigs especially suffer and are held prisoners in tight gestation crates where they can't even turn around. The funds should have been used to find ways to free them from this cruelty, but instead were being used to monetarily enrich themselves at the expense of these poor animals.
The HSUS has provided us with background information re the pork industry's misuse of public money:
"Under federal law, farmers of certain commodities (including pork, beef, and eggs) are required to pay a percentage of their sales into a check-off fund. These funds are intended to be used to promote the sale of farm products, and the National Pork Board is the group created to be the custodian of the money." (Isn't this so like appointing the wolf to guard
the hen house?)
It turns out that this determination resulted in the misuse of public money to promote pork. More specifically, the HSUS notes that it is bad enough that farmers are forced to pay dues even if they don't want to participate, but then have their own money being used against them -- promoting Big Ag at their expense. As a result, our government is enabling the industry to spend millions of dollars each year to promote their products, and sadly,- precious few of them promoting the buying of fruits and vegetables.
Finally, there is hope because of the HSUS lawsuit that these small farmers may experience some justice at last. The misdirection of millions of dollars to promote the NPPC will now be hopefully stopped. And as the HSUS notes, that if this happens- we will have succeeded in halting corruption and the sweetheart deal to Big Pork. This misuse of the public taxpayer funds should never have happened in the first place. And it is also sad to me that not Congress but the HSUS and others had to sue to secure this hopefully favorable outcome.
I foolishly thought that this is what Congress is suppose to do --protect small farmers and consumers alike against corruption and misuse of public tax money. However, in their defense, viewing the daily work load of Congress through Vox Populi, I guess some things do slip through
the cracks. However, this was a pretty expensive and big crack -- a yearly $60 million dollar disbursement to a private interest -- the Pork industry.
I and others who are vegan feel especially violated. We don't want our taxes used in such a cruel and unnecessary way.

 

- Advertisement -

Must Read 1   Well Said 1   Valuable 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

I have been concerned about animal suffering ever since
I received my first puppy Peaches in 1975. She made me take a good look at the animal kingdom and I was shocked to see how badly we treat so many animals. At 77, I've been a vegan for the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Horse Racing Cruelty

Vote NO on Issue 2 if You Llive in Ohio

Leo Grillo/Delta Rescue

Can Veganism Save the World?