Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Poll Analyses
Share on Facebook 7 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 2/5/20

Stop Playing Games With the Mangled Iowa Caucus Count

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages) (View How Many People Read This)   4 comments
Author 29155
Follow Me on Twitter     Message John Nichols
Become a Fan
  (24 fans)

From The Nation

The Iowa Democratic Party's release of partial results at this point adds insult to injury.

Iowa caucus results delayed due to vote-counting system failures
Iowa caucus results delayed due to vote-counting system failures
(Image by YouTube, Channel: ABC News)
  Details   DMCA

After a night of chaos, in which it did not release the results of the first-in-the-nation caucuses, the Iowa Democratic Party finally produced some numbers Tuesday afternoon. Keyword: some. At this point, that's adding insult to injury.

The party has been under intense pressure to clean up the mess it made of the vote tabulation on caucus night when no results were released because the party relied on a dysfunctional app and a failed backup system involving a phone hotline that left callers on hold for hours. So on Tuesday afternoon, the party released some of the results 62 percent, to be precise.

If one candidate had a big lead, an incomplete count might tell us something. But, with less than two-thirds of the vote tabulated, the top two candidates were virtually tied. Former South Bend mayor Pete Buttigieg had 26.9 percent, and Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders 25.1 percent. Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren was at 18.3 percent and former vice president Joe Biden trailed with 15.6 percent.

Those percentages reflect the so-called "state delegate equivalents," not the actual popular vote. The popular vote, which reflects the final alignment of people who attended the more than 1,600 caucuses statewide, put Sanders ahead with 28,220 votes to 27,030 for Buttigieg, while Warren had 22,254 and Biden had 14,176. If Iowa were a primary state, Sanders would be winning. Because it is a caucus state, Buttigieg got at least a momentary bump. But that could change tonight or tomorrow -- or sometime soon.

So all we really know is that we don't yet know enough to say who won. Mayor Pete was collecting those cherished "Buttigieg has narrow lead" headlines and speculation by MSNBC's Chris Matthews that he is "the new star" as the Sanders campaign was thanking the people of Iowa because, in their words, from "the partial data released so far it's clear that in the first and second round more people voted for Bernie than any other candidate in the field."

Remarkably, the Iowa Democratic Party on Tuesday evening found a way to maintain the chaos and confusion of caucus night, to create more confusion and frustration, and to very possibly foster several false impressions. Sanders strategists believe their candidate has a good chance of winning in the final count. Biden's position could actually worsen -- perhaps even to a point where Minnesota Senator Amy Klobuchar closes a roughly 800-vote gap and pushes the former vice president into a fifth-place finish.

If it were caucus night and results were being released as they arrived at the party headquarters, few people would jump to conclusions before the count was final, because built into expectations about election nights is the possibility that a reported result will be corrected. But caucus night has passed.

So why, after screwing everything up when it mattered most, would the Iowa Democratic Party release part of the count? Why not get the count completed and release it when everything is in order?

The answer is that they are trying to ease their embarrassment by playing a dangerous game that they hope will satisfy the media.

It won't. The Iowa party's failure is writ so large across the 2020 campaign that before caucus night had ended, a serious debate had opened up about the need to yank Iowa's first-in-the-nation status. Now, the party needs to stop playing games and announcing partial results and get it done right.

This is about more than bruised egos. This is about the possibility that the headlines and not the actual delegate count will carry weight into the next primaries and caucuses and warp the race for the presidency -- as the Iowa Republican Party did in 2012 when the January 3 caucus night count gave a narrow win to eventual nominee Mitt Romney over former Pennsylvania senator Rick Santorum. Seventeen days later, the Iowa GOP declared that Santorum was actually the winner -- but that was after he has lost the New Hampshire and South Carolina primaries.

What might have happened if Santorum had gotten the "Iowa winner" headline? Would he have done better in the primary race? Almost certainly. Indeed, a Washington Post headline from Tuesday, February 4 read: "For Iowa, a second caucus debacle in eight years."

Next Page  1  |  2

 

Rate It | View Ratings

John Nichols Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

John Nichols, a pioneering political blogger, has written the Online Beat since 1999. His posts have been circulated internationally, quoted in numerous books and mentioned in debates on the floor of Congress.

Nichols writes about (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Paul Ryan? Seriously?

Scott Walker's Austerity Agenda Yields 'Worst Job Losses in US'

What the Hell Is Wrong With Paul Ryan?

The Koch Brothers, ALEC and the Savage Assault on Democracy

GM's Plant Closures Confirm the President is a Liar and a Fool

The Deafening Silence of the Republican Field in the Wake of the Planned Parenthood Shooting

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 4 comments


Dave Lindorff

Become a Fan
Author 63
(Member since Nov 18, 2005), 88 fans, 1231 articles, 120 quicklinks, 1132 comments, 1 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Not paid member although Facebook page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Twitter page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Linkedin page url on login Profile is filled in Not paid member although Instagram page url on login Profile is filled in

  New Content

All well and good comrade John, but you might also want to mention that the only reason this matters is that Americans have so little attachment to actual ideologies, and are so caught up in personalities and the artificial "theater" of elections that things like momentum and poll results can have significant influence on their votes. In a true political contest, where candidates stood for things, knowing how other candidates were doing in prior elections would have zero impact on one's vote. And indeed, I suspect none of this matters to the Sanders voters in New Hampshire, who are a committed bunch and wouldn't change their votes to Butt just because he "won" the most delegates in Iowa.


Dave LIndorff

founding editor or ThisCantBeHappening(dot)net

Submitted on Wednesday, Feb 5, 2020 at 9:02:19 PM

  Recommend  (2+)
Help

George King

Become a Fan
Author 95129
(Member since Aug 11, 2014), 20 fans, 22 articles, 2824 comments, 1 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

  New Content

John, Putin and Russia prepares to release the Iowa Caucus results. As for the real story you just can't make this s**t up from the Theater of the Absurd, why are not these perpetrators swinging from lamppost yesterday? Here & here.


Submitted on Thursday, Feb 6, 2020 at 1:48:01 AM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help
Indent

Chuck Nafziger

Become a Fan
Author 24101
(Member since Oct 12, 2008), 16 fans, 6 articles, 14 quicklinks, 2239 comments (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to George King:   New Content

It would be wonderful if Vlad had operatives in the Iowa caucuses so he could give us the results in a timely manner. We won't get anything truthful from the dems.

Submitted on Thursday, Feb 6, 2020 at 6:44:16 PM

  Recommend  (1+)
Help
IndentIndent

George King

Become a Fan
Author 95129
(Member since Aug 11, 2014), 20 fans, 22 articles, 2824 comments, 1 diaries (How many times has this commenter been recommended?)
Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Reply to Chuck Nafziger:   New Content

Aye on that thought but he dosen't have any interest in US politics and has long ago turned to building life in a multilateral world devoid of transnational criminal cabals spreading death and destruction on a global citizenry. I think they have moved on and will let the empire die a thousand deaths as Nero fiddles to the flames but will meet any threats put to action/s by the gangs, let there be no mistake in this!

Submitted on Friday, Feb 7, 2020 at 8:24:57 AM

  Recommend  (0+)
Help