Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 66 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H1'ed 10/16/19

Steps To Remove Billionaires

90m Mega Yacht - Phoenix2 by Lurssen
90m Mega Yacht - Phoenix2 by Lurssen
(Image by Glyn Lowe Photoworks)
  Details   DMCA

There are more and more people saying that billionaires should not exist. I've been saying it since 2012. I call it my No Billionaires, Debillionairize the Planet Crusade.

One question that I get is HOW? How do we make it so billionaires don't exist? This article provides details.

I was on a conservative podcast this week, Slightly Sophisticated, with Kyle Ramos, discussing my belief that we should be debillionairizing the planet-- an idea that tends to make conservatives' heads explode. He asked me how I would propose to do it. Should we take away their money? I was vague in my reply. But I do have answers.

I want to be clear that I am not opposed to people becoming wealthy. But there should be limits to wealth. People are considered "Ultra-wealthy" if they are worth more than $35 million. I'd say, that for starters, we don't want to see people worth more than ten times that-- $350 million. And keep in mind that the wealthy have ways to mask their wealth, like having properties assessed at extremely low values. Trump has done this. So, let's use a wealth limit even more than that-- half a billion dollars.

There are several ways to make it so no billionaires exist:

  • 1-prevent billionaires from passing on their billions when they die-- primarily with what I call a dynasty tax.

  • 2-prevent people from becoming billionaires
  • 3-Make it so existing billionaires are debillionairized-- i.e., no longer billionaires.
  • 4- Debillionairize the entire world, not just the USA
  • 1-prevent billionaires from passing on their billions when they die

    The first item is the easiest. Simply institute inheritance taxes (I call them Dynasty taxes) and regulations that prevent billionaires from transferring their wealth to their relatives. This will have to include checking offshore accounts and creation of third party organizations, like foundations. Sorry, but transferring your money to a foundation that you still control directly or indirectly doesn't cut it. Trump raise the limit so most inheritance, or estate taxes (called Death Taxes by Republican framing master Frank Luntz.) only apply to a few thousand people. Wikipedia says,

    If an asset is left to a spouse or a federally recognized charity, the tax usually does not apply. In addition, a maximum amount, varying year by year, can be given by an individual, before and/or upon their death, without incurring federal gift or estate taxes:[3] $5,340,000 for estates of persons dying in 2014[4] and 2015,[5] $5,450,000 (effectively $10.90 million per married couple, assuming the deceased spouse did not leave assets to the surviving spouse) for estates of persons dying in 2016.[6] Because of these exemptions, it is estimated that only the largest 0.2% of estates in the U.S. will pay the tax.[7] For 2017, the exemption increased to $5.5 million. In 2018, the exemption doubled to $11.18 million per taxpayer due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017. As a result, only about 2,000 estates per year in the US are currently liable for estate tax.[8]

    After a certain amount, estates should be taxed at 100%.

    2-prevent people from becoming billionaires

    This is a bit easier, since you are not taking away money or assets that someone already has. But the main argument people make against this is that not allowing people to become billionaires will discourage business people and investors from investing money or time.

    First, let's talk about how to prevent people from becoming billionaires.

    Bernie Sanders is on the right track. So was Dwight Eisenhower, under whom the tax rate on earnings over a certain level was over ninety percent. People argue that back in Eisenhower's day people easily evaded the highest taxes. They use that as an excuse for not even trying. And they are right that tax evasion was and still is rampant. We have to be much smarter about this.

    We start by setting the limit-- again, I'd go with $500 million. That will include all ways of measuring assets-- cash, savings, securities, real estate and all forms of equity in companies. So, if a company founder takes a company public and only 10% of the equity in the company's stock is offered, then his 90% share in the company would be nine times the value of the shares offered. We have to be smart and not allow loopholes.

    Will entrepreneurs be motivated to innovate if they can only make $500 million. I think they will, even if getting there they are exposed to graduated taxes, so the last 10% is taxed at 90% and all of the assets over $500 million are taxed.

    But the assets do not necessarily have to be taxed. The entrepreneur can share money, stock and equity with employees, turning the company into a worker cooperative. The entrepreneur can share resources an stock ownership with all the stakeholders, not just employees. That would include the local community-- local government, local non-profits, churches, and also funding for the local environment. The money and assets can go to supporting local infrastructure repairs and improvements.

    Next Page  1  |  2

    (Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

    Well Said 3   Must Read 2   Supported 2  
    Rate It | View Ratings

    Rob Kall Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

    Rob Kall is an award winning journalist, inventor, software architect, connector and visionary. His work and his writing have been featured in the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, CNN, ABC, the HuffingtonPost, Success, Discover and other media. 

    Check out his platform at

    He is the author of The Bottom-up Revolution; Mastering the Emerging World of Connectivity

    He's given talks and workshops to Fortune 500 execs and national medical and psychological organizations, and pioneered first-of-their-kind conferences in Positive Psychology, Brain Science and Story. He hosts some of the world's smartest, most interesting and powerful people on his Bottom Up Radio Show, and founded and publishes one of the top Google- ranked progressive news and opinion sites,

    more detailed bio: 

    Rob Kall has spent his adult life as an awakener and empowerer-- first in the field of biofeedback, inventing products, developing software and a music recording label, MuPsych, within the company he founded in 1978-- Futurehealth, and founding, organizing and running 3 conferences: Winter Brain, on Neurofeedback and consciousness, Optimal Functioning and Positive Psychology (a pioneer in the field of Positive Psychology, first presenting workshops on it in 1985) and Storycon Summit Meeting on the Art Science and Application of Story-- each the first of their kind.  Then, when he found the process of raising people's consciousness and empowering them to take more control of their lives  one person at a time was too slow, he founded which has been the top search result on Google for the terms liberal news and progressive opinion for several years. Rob began his Bottom-up Radio show, broadcast on WNJC 1360 AM to Metro Philly, also available on iTunes, covering the transition of our culture, business and world from predominantly Top-down (hierarchical, centralized, authoritarian, patriarchal, big)  to bottom-up (egalitarian, local, interdependent, grassroots, archetypal feminine and small.) Recent long-term projects include a book, Bottom-up-- The Connection Revolution, debillionairizing the planet (more...)

    Go To Commenting
    The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
    Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

    Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
    Support OpEdNews

    OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

    If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

    If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
    Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
       (Opens new browser window)

    Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

    A Conspiracy Conspiracy Theory

    Debunking Hillary's Specious Winning the Popular Vote Claim

    Terrifying Video: "I Don't Need a Warrant, Ma'am, Under Federal Law"

    Ray McGovern Discusses Brutal Arrest at Secretary Clinton's Internet Freedom Speech

    Hillary's Disingenuous Claim That She's Won 2.5 Million More Votes is Bogus. Here's why

    Cindy Sheehan Bugged in Denver

    To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

    Tell A Friend