Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

Spy vs. Spy—Redacting The Last 8 Years

By       Message William R Castlelich       (Page 1 of 4 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   1 comment

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 9/20/09

Author 38325
- Advertisement -

When I was a lot younger I used to love to watch I Spy, the show with Robert Culp and Bill Cosby. I also, up until about a decade ago, watched every James Bond movie and watched several a number of times. In addition, throughout my youth, I purchased Mad Magazine and not because I wanted to see the most recent exploits of Alfred E. Newman, but because of the exploits of Antonio Prohias' black and white Spy vs. Spy.

The reason the preceding is important is because I want to talk about the relatively recent release of reports discussing the interrogation techniques used on terrorist suspects post 9-1-1 and I believe, if someone is going to delve into the dark underbelly of military intelligence, the CIA, FBI, other acronyms and initials, he or she should be willing to establish his or her credentials.

I believe my first paragraph not only establishes my credentials as an avid watcher of a number of different media and an avid reader of some rather in-depth social commentary, but also establishes me as something of an expert on the intelligence community and intelligence gathering in general.

Some I'm sure will argue "But those aren't reality. Those are made up things and a comic strip."

- Advertisement -

And my retort would be "And how are these not representative of reality?"

I believe hours and hours of I Spy, and hours and hours and hours of the Bond series and volumes of Spy vs. Spy more than qualifies me, MORE THAN, as an intelligence expert.

"Mars is essentially in the same orbit...Mars is somewhat the same distance from the Sun, which is very important. We have seen pictures where there are canals, we believe, and water. If there is water, that means there is oxygen. If oxygen, that means we can breathe." GW Bush, 43rd President of the United States

- Advertisement -

In all my preceding study, however, I never once, not a single time, ran across redaction, the process of censorship that insures no national secrets will be divulged to evil doers by inadvertently allowing a national intelligence treasure out into the mainstream or not so mainstream media.

As I read the reports, and shockingly I actually read them, I was struck by how little actual information was left un-redacted, but I was more struck by what was left in and what was taken out (which of course, even with my expertise, was immensely difficult to glean from the sections of the reports that were simply black blocks). Let me try to explain that last rather convoluted and confusing sentence--you will find, however, that "convoluted and confusing" is spy stuff.

Page 30, #63--"Among standard interrogation techniques are the use of isolation, sleep deprivation not to exceed 72 hours, reduced caloric intake (so long as the amount is calculated to maintain the general health of the detainee), deprivation of reading material, use of loud music or white noise (at a decibel level calculated to avoid damage to the detainee's hearing), the use of diapers for limited periods (generally not to exceed 72 hours)" [REDACTED about 50 characters--please note all number of characters are estimates] "and moderate psychological pressures. The DCI Interrogation Guidelines do not specifically prohibit improvised actions."

- Advertisement -

The preceding quote was obviously not redacted, except for those approximately 50 characters noted. Why was this stuff left un-redacted? How is this not a national secret? Isn't the preceding basically a formula for this enhanced interrogation stuff? I mean I'm not sure if the al-queda guys can read English, but they probably know people who can, and doesn't the preceding sort of tell them, if they capture one of us, what to do to make us talk. I mean if someone was playing that stuff you hear in dentists' offices or on elevators real loud and I was in the room I'd pretty much start even probably trying to make stuff up to make them quit.

And don't even start talking to me about wearing diapers; I'll be singing when I see the box of Pampers.

And this is completely off the subject, well, not completely, but mostly, but isn't it interesting how similar al-queda and al-gebra are? When I was in school I was tortured by algebra and now, again, using the cutting edge intelligence mind I developed over years of study, know why.

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3  |  4

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

A writer for over 30 years and political satirist. Of course without a single published piece of merit, which makes me your average American blogger.

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why the US Postal Service Will Not Survive

I'd rather be Blowing Sailors than be Banking

The Perfect Republican Argument

When Oil Spills Go Nuclear

My War On Christmas

If it doesn't go in very far, are you still getting screwed?