Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds

"Splain, Lucy

By       Message John Little       (Page 1 of 2 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   3 comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Funny 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Author 20532
Become a Fan
  (12 fans)
- Advertisement -

Ricky at his best
(Image by John Little)
  Permission   Details   DMCA


Karl Rove was geared to win and to win big. He was spending OPM (Other People's Money) like there was no tomorrow. The only problem is tomorrow has arrived and the other guy won.

- Advertisement -

Um, oopsies.

Karl had promised a landslide. He promised Romney would win and win big. This was going to make the 2010 election look like a pep rally for the big boys. In fact, he was right. The only problem was he picked the wrong "big boys", after spending around $400 million of his friends' money to get what the Supreme Court had promised them, as many elections as they care to afford.

Karl Rove told Fox News on November 1, " My prediction: Sometime after the rooster crows on the morning of Nov. 7, Mitt Romney will be declared America's 45th president. Let's call it 51%-48%, with Mr. Romney carrying at least 279 Electoral College votes, probably more." 

- Advertisement -

Fox News was all over his idea. All their pundits came down on Karl's side. The day before the election, Fred Barnes wrote an opinion piece for Fox News explaining why it was so friggin' obvious that Mitt had this one "in the bag."   According to Barnes, " Enthusiasm! It matters enormously, and it's disproportionately on the Republican side, in good measure because of an intense desire to defeat President Obama."

Oops again.

Charles Krauthammer made a guest appearance on the O'Reilly Factor the day before elections and promised this: " I think Ohio goes to Romney for the reasons Karl [Rove] said. If you look at the early polling, Obama was way behind where he was four years ago."


Even Newt Gingrich, in an article posted on October 26, predicted that Romney would win over 300 electoral votes. For him, this was a no brainer. He stated, "I believe then minimum result will be 53 to 47 Romney, over 300 electoral votes, and the Republicans will pick up the Senate. I base that on just years and years of experience."

- Advertisement -

Oops squared!

On November 1, Fox News contributor Michael Barone, gave the assessment that a hidden vote existed among independent voters that was going to skew the results in Romney's favor. In fact, he predicted a landslide for Romney.   And, according to Michael, he wasn't the only one with his viewpoint.

Oops ad nauseam.

On October 31, even the great pundit Dick Morris opined that it was a given, Romney will win a landslide.

Next Page  1  |  2


- Advertisement -

Funny 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

60 year old Californian male - I've lived in four different countries, USA, Switzerland, Mexico, Venezuela - speak three languages fluently, English, French, Spanish - part-time journalist for Empower-Sport Magazine. I also write four (more...)

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Tarahumara Indians of Mexico "Olympics Too Short"

Elecricity for Venezuela - Rednecks in Chavezland

The International Distortion of the Dominican Dilemma

The new and revised Preamble to the Constitution


Chapter Thirteen: The Cuban Missile Crisis of October, 1962