Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 2 (2 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   No comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Socialize This

By       Message Angie Riedel       (Page 1 of 3 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; (more...) ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  (less...)  Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 20323
- Advertisement -
Every time I hear someone going on about how this or that necessary no-brainer, long over due legislation cannot be passed because it would be socialism! GASP!, I know I'm talking to someone who has either never thought things through or is a dufus.  

What do you call an entire country getting soaked for something called taxes and that cumulative money is supposedly used for every single thing this government does?  

What is the difference pray tell, between people being forced to fund our endless war machine, and people being forced to fund a free national health care system?  I'll start the clock ticking down here and give you a minute to come up with the answer that's supposed to make it okay to use our aggregate funds to make rich war mongers richer and kill innocent civilians in other countries while it's hold-yer-nose horrible to use a percentage of that dollar amount to ensure all Americans have health care and dental care.  

I'm waiting.

- Advertisement -
The difference seems to be two fold.  First, all of the money goes to rich people.  Second, a lot of people suffer and die.  Now apparently, this socialized war machine is a good thing and is not socialism because the wealth is not spread around to benefit those who chip in.  If the benefit was spread around so all would be better off, that would be socialism and a very bad thing.

I think it would do us all a lot of good to realize that the dark and ugly PR job done on our heads about spreading around the wealth is a product of the rich.  People like Paulson (with a reported 700 million in personal wealth) and the richer Texan oil crowd, the spoiled mega wealthy types, these are the ones who are all for socialism as long as it works out that it's our money they get to use and spend and take home in caravan loads; AND when they don't get their 2000% returns on investments and corporate ventures and there are actual losses on the books, then socializing the losses, i.e. spreading those losses around to the entire public, that's okay.  That's a good thing.

It absolutely is a good thing if you're a rich MF.  But here's the fact that cannot be uttered lest the rich and useless shall faint dead away.  It sucks for the whole rest of the country.  That's the truth.

- Advertisement -
The thing that makes rich people's skin crawl is the idea of our money being used to benefit us.  That's something they see as evil and they've tagged it with a word, socialism.  The intent is to send chills up and down our spines and make us feel very afraid.  We can't have socialism here, it's downright un-American.

Well that's all well and good but the bottom line is, we've already got socialism here.  Rich people's socialism.  Our money is taken from every last one of us, and is given to the rich. It's even taken from people who turn a couple hundred dollars profit in some teeny home or garage business enterprise where nothing but their own hard work earns them a thousand bucks or so in a year.  Even they are forced, by law, at gunpoint, to cough up some of those earnings and give it over to dear Uncle Sam for the rich.  

Uncle Sam is a bit of an idiot if nothing else because if Uncle Sam really was interested in getting his hands on some real money, he wouldn't be wasting his time on people who don't have any. At budget balancing time he wouldn't be slashing sorely needed social programs for the poorest people in America.  He would be knocking on the doors of the 20% of people in this country who have 80% of ALL of this country's wealth.  

Rich people's socialism is based on the principle that our money is taken from us and given to them.  And by strict definition, that's not socialism because it's not spread around.  It starts out as socialism as every pocket is picked, but then immediately transforms itself into oligarchy, elitism and greed at gunpoint, because we're legally required to cough up our hard earned dough and let them have it to do whatever they like with it.  

What they like is welfare for the rich, bail outs for the richest Wall Street tycoons in the world, fat subsidies for themselves, no taxes for themselves, in fact, nothing for themselves but our money.  All of our money.  All of the wealth, all of the privilege, all of the free lunches, all of the prime real estate, all of the self-serving laws that force us to buy their stadiums and R&D and pave their golden roads for them; but none of the responsibility, none of the work it takes to earn a dime, and none of the realities of life the rest of us have no choice about.  It's all about getting and never, ever about giving anything back.  Calling it a trickle down theory is apt.  It's the bread crumb theory.  They feast on lavish lifestyles that we pay for, and when the waiter shakes out the table cloth afterwards, the rest of us may divide whatever crumbs are left behind on the dirty floor.

How very nice of them.

- Advertisement -
Let me shatter their lovely little daydream with some ideas we must never have.  It's time to have lots of those ideas.  In fact it's time to out do ourselves thinking about this whole stupid, outrageous set up.  It's time to change the way we do things in this country and the first change goes right to the top of the food chain.  I think it's time for the fat cats to catch their own mice, the hard way, just like the rest of us alley cats.  

Like it or not, we now have an ingrained system of permanent taxation.  None of us can make a cent without Uncle Sam showing up with his hand out telling us how much of what we earn belongs to him.  Nothing about that makes sense, at least not in terms of being a free country.  Because face it, if someone else has the legal right to force us to spend our money according to their say so, we aren't free.  We are no more free than we are free in what to do with our hard earned money.  

If we really wanted to reclaim our freedom, we'd abolish federal taxation completely because we don't need all that federalness.  We just don't.  It is separated from our daily lives and more and more has become a voracious consuming brat and monster that runs our lives whether we like it or not.  If we stop feeding the beast it will die.  At the very least, it might learn how to behave itself and remember what a "servant" is supposed to act like.  

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Angie Riedel lives in Silicon Valley, CA and believes it just isn't that hard to create responsible, mutually beneficial ways to coexist in this world. She has a blog at thinkorbeeaten.blogspot.com and a website featuring almost 300 videos you won't (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

- Advertisement -