A story published in the NY Times last week reported that the U.S., since shutting down many of its secret prisons, has been “relying heavily on foreign intelligence services to capture, interrogate, and detain all but the highest-level terrorist suspects seized outside the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.”
The NY Times article suggests that this shift in policy represents a “loosening of the reins” as it is now pushing cooperation with foreign partners and its intelligence services to new limits.
This shows that the extraordinary rendition program of the Bush years has undergone an evolution to a point where CIA and other U.S. agencies and arms of the military do everything possible to not have anything to do with the arrest and detention of terror suspects (because, of course, this makes it less likely the U.S. will be accused of conspiring to violate the rule of law).
Might Panetta and his CIA and members of the Obama Administration be continuing a horrible habit of the Bush Administration --- trying to get around the rule of law as much as possible?
The article raises a few questions for those observing and monitoring the “war on terror” closely, for those who are weary of the “war on terror’s” dark and inhumane impact on human rights and civil liberties worldwide.
First, there was no mention of how the Obama Administration is handling the refurbished “extraordinary rendition” program on Thursday of last week when Obama gave his “national security speech” (notice Cheney said nothing about Obama’s plans to ruin that program).
Perhaps, we should assume this program is something the administration wishes to keep secret. It has been difficult to garner information on renditions because the CIA guards that information closely (probably as “state secrets”).
(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).