Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 4 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

Sloppy Comments on Iran's "Nukes"

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 1553
Message Robert Parry
Become a Fan
  (84 fans)
This article cross-posted from Consortium News

Mark Landler, New York Times' White House correspondent

As Americans ponder a possible war with Iran over its nuclear program, they reasonably might turn to someone like Mark Landler, the New York Times' White House correspondent, for a careful explication of the facts. If so, they might have heard an explanation like this, which Landler provided to MSNBC viewers on Monday:
"The Israelis feel the window for that [denying Iran the capability to build nuclear weapons] is closing and it's closing really fast, and if they allow it to close without taking military action, they would find themselves in a position where the Iranians suddenly are in possession of nuclear weapons, which they've threatened already to use against Israel.

"As the Israelis always say, that's an existential threat to Israel, which is something we don't necessarily feel here in the United States."

Now, that sounds really scary -- that the Iranians have "threatened already to use [nuclear weapons] against Israel" which the Israelis understandably perceive as an "existential threat." Except, of course, that Iran has not threatened to attack Israel with nuclear weapons. Indeed, Iranian leaders continue to deny that they even want nuclear weapons.

Just last month, Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, who controls the armed forces, called "the possession of nuclear weapons a grave sin," and said "the proliferation of such weapons is senseless, destructive and dangerous." He insisted that "the Iranian nation has never pursued and will never pursue nuclear weapons."

Further, the U.S. intelligence community reported in 2007 that Iran stopped research work on a nuclear weapon in 2003 and had not resumed that effort. That assessment was reaffirmed in 2010 and remains the position of the CIA and other intelligence agencies.

Last weekend elections also strengthened Khamenei's hand vis a vis the lame-duck President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whose erratic statements are often cited by Israel and its supporters to justify a possible military attack on Iran. (Even before the election, however, Ahmadinejad's power was tightly circumscribed by Khamenei, as blogger Juan Cole has noted.)

Yet, it is common practice for American journalists simply to parrot the Israeli propaganda theme that Iran's achievement of just a "capability" to build a nuclear bomb, even if Iran is not really building one, represents an unacceptable threat to Israel. Those reporters also rarely mention that Israel has an actual arsenal of some 200 to 300 nuclear bombs.

These American journalists presumably see a greater risk to their careers from mentioning such inconvenient truths as the existence of Israel's sophisticated and undeclared nuclear arsenal than from misleading the U.S. people into another "war of choice" in the Middle East. You may recall a similar pattern during the run-up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq in 2003.

So, instead of balanced analysis on the true state of play in the Israeli-Iranian stand-off, U.S. journalists like Landler deliver fear- and war-mongering declarations, albeit in measured tones, thus leaving Americans like those MSNBC viewers with the unchallenged assertion that Iran already has threatened to annihilate Israel with nuclear weapons.

Landler did not provide any citation or any detail for his claim. It was presented as just one of those assumptions that everyone knows must be true.

Yet, it would be one of the strangest threats in world history for a nation without nuclear weapons -- and whose top leader disavows any intent to get nuclear weapons -- to threaten use of those non-existent weapons against a nation which has a large stockpile of nuclear weapons.


Rate It | View Ratings

Robert Parry Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Robert Parry broke many of the Iran-Contra stories in the 1980s for the Associated Press and Newsweek. His latest book, Secrecy & Privilege: Rise of the Bush Dynasty from Watergate to Iraq, can be ordered at It's also available at

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The CIA/Likud Sinking of Jimmy Carter

What Did US Spy Satellites See in Ukraine?

Ron Paul's Appalling World View

Ronald Reagan: Worst President Ever?

The Disappearance of Keith Olbermann

A Perjurer on the US Supreme Court

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: