Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit Share on StumbleUpon Tell A Friend 1 (1 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   45 comments
Exclusive to OpEdNews:
OpEdNews Op Eds

Should al-Qaeda have the right to bear arms?

By       Message James Murtagh     Permalink
      (Page 1 of 2 pages)
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; ; ; ; , Add Tags Add to My Group(s)

Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H2 6/9/11

Become a Fan
  (8 fans)
- Advertisement -

Note:  Julian Walker of the Virginian Post suggests we have a new problem. Terrorists may use the second amendment against the US.

  See: click here

- Advertisement -

Personally, my interpretation of the second amendment is that patriot founders wanted well-regulated militias run by Generals like George Washington to route the British. The Amendment never meant to support Benedict Arnold-splinter militia groups to put Patriot police in the cross-hairs of terrorists. Nor did early Patriots envision arming hostile crips with Saturday Night specials or rapid-fire machine guns. Thomas Jefferson did not envision the Capone gang, nor did Benjamin Franklin celebrate an Annual Valentine Massacres. Columbines do not appear to be part of the Federalist papers.

Well, now we have a new twist: the al-Qaida wants the right to equally bear arms in the USA. Given the Sarah Palin interpretation of our right to bear arms, how could we stop the arming of al-Qaida sympathizers within the US? Do some Americans have the right to arms, and others don't? Would Palin allow white America to bear arms, but deny that right to Muslim-Americans? A right is a right after all. We do not racially profile any constitutional rights.


IAW
(Image by James Murtagh)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Incredibly, al-Qaida spokesman Adam Gadahn claims that minions in the West they are "perfectly placed" to do "major damage to the enemies of Islam" and suggests one way to do that is to acquire deadly weapons.

- Advertisement -

"America is absolutely awash with easily obtainable firearms," Gadahn states.

Apparently al-Quida had been closely following the statements of Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, who have been advocating "second amendment" solutions to the problems America faces.

I have always been a "first amendment" civil libertarian. The right to free speech and freedom of conscience is my highest priority. I value solutions that do not involve guns. "Second amendment" Americans, on the other hand, apparently stress the right to bear arms over all other rights.

The pen is mightier than the sword- or is it? The Roberts Supreme Court appears to favor guns over all.

George Washington won his war with amazing self-control, and by avoiding large battles. His strategic acumen was more valuable than his muskets in winning freedom. "The shot heard round the world" was a well-placed shot by a single musket- not a strafe of random rapid-fire assault bullets.

Given the debate over Paul Revere's ride precipitated by Sarah Palin's bizarre remarks, it is time to return to the original intent of the forefather's concept of "well regulated Militias."

Washington believed in discipline. He did not allow splinter groups commanded by Benedict Arnold to have unlimited guns. Neither would Washington allow gangs, thugs and terrorists have access to unlimited muskets.

- Advertisement -

We need to rethink the true intent of the second amendment. Washington must be turning over in his grave when America's enemies come to America to be easily armed by America to torment American police and American citizens.

Sarah Palin was apparently motivated to make a point that Americans would not give up their guns when she made her gaffe about Paul Revere. Now, it is time for Palin to fess up. None of the original Patriots would have allowed terrorists to be armed as an enemy within America.

My guess is that Palin would object to arming al-Quida sympathizers in America. But I have no idea how she would justify that some Americans have an absolute sacred right to own any gun regardless of destructive power, but other Americans, such as from the middle east, did not.

Palin learned the hard way what Paul Revere was doing through his ride to warn patriots. Now, new Paul Reveres must ride to warn the country of the danger of unbridled, unregulated guns awash in the USA.

Next Page  1  |  2

 

- Advertisement -

Interesting 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

James J. Murtagh, Jr. is a doctor of pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine, and the Medical Director of several sleep laboratories in Southern Ohio. Dr. Murtagh extensively writes on medical ethics. Dr. Murtagh is the founder of a new (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon



Go To Commenting
/* The Petition Site */
The views expressed in this article are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why Sister Aloysius "Doubts"

Sarah Palin is the Ultimate RINO

Patients and Doctors Demand Integrity in Medicine!

Sarah Palin is National Traitor

Should al-Qaeda have the right to bear arms?