Power of Story Send a Tweet        

Share on Google Plus Share on Twitter 2 Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn 1 Share on PInterest Share on Fark! Share on Reddit 1 Share on StumbleUpon 1 Tell A Friend (5 Shares)  

Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites (# of views)   5 comments
OpEdNews Op Eds

Shifting the timeline: US Media Fudge Rebels' Douma Surrender Date To Imply Alleged Assad Chemical Attack Turned Tide

By       Message Dave Lindorff       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags  Add to My Group(s)

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com Headlined to H3 4/24/18

Author 63
Become a Fan
  (82 fans)
- Advertisement -

By Dave Lindorff

From navylive.dodlive.mil: U.S. Navy Destroyers Launch Strikes on Syria | Navy Live1024 Ã-- 576 - 49k -
Tomahawk missile being launched towards Syria on 4/13
(Image by navylive.dodlive.mil)
  Permission   Details   DMCA

Investigators from the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) have only recently reached Douma, scene of an alleged chemical bombing attack on April 7, and have not yet had time to test samples they collected to see if banned poison chemicals were actually used, but already US mainstream media reporting on the situation in the Damascus suburb where the alleged chemical attack is said to have occurred is starting to shift. That shift tends to make the story to fall more comfortably in line with the US government position that the attack, if it happened, was the work of the Syrian military, and that Assad's "attack" caused rebels to surrender and agree to leave the embattled city.

- Advertisement -

The problem is, though, that back on April 1, a week before the alleged attack, the Associated Press was reporting something quite different : namely that rebels in Douma were beginning to evacuate the area they had held for years, under a safe passage agreement negotiated with the Syrian government, according to which buses would be able to remove them to safety in the north of the country. That report made clear that the rebel resistance had already collapsed g and that the rebel fighters were going to be evacuated in following days by chartered buses, which had already begun moving them out of the city well before April 7.

A French state television report on April 1 also reported that on that date:

Negotiators in the last rebel-held bastion in Syria's eastern Ghouta reached a deal on Saturday with the Russian side to evacuate the wounded from Douma to rebel-held northern Syria, local sources familiar with the deal said.
The agreement was reached by the negotiating committee that comprises both civic leaders and representatives of Jaish al-Islam, the rebel faction in control of Douma, the sources said.
The committee has been negotiating a deal to spare the city a military assault by the Syrian army and its allies who encircle it. They have threatened to storm the city if rebels do not agree to surrender the last patch in the enclave in return for safe passage to insurgent-held territory in northwestern Syria.

- Advertisement -

These accounts of course raise serious questions as to why Assad would opt to drop a few chemical bombs as he's accused by the US of doing, killing a few dozen local residents while predictably angering the world community and giving the US an opening to bomb his forces. Why do that if Assad's military forces had already won full control of the last rebel stronghold in Syria's capital city region, with an agreement, already being implemented, to ship the rebels out of the city?

But three weeks later, AP was reporting that the same rebel militants "gave up the town days after the alleged attack." As the article by AP reporter Philip Issa states, "Thousands of people -- rebels and civilians -- left Douma on buses to north Syria in the days after the suspected attack, believing they could not live under government authority after it retook the town."

So what's the story, AP? "

For the rest of this article by DAVE LINDORFF in ThisCantBeHappening!, the uncompromised, collectively run, six-time Project Censored Award-winning online alternative news site, please go to: www.thiscantbehappening.net/node/3874

- Advertisement -

(Article changed on April 24, 2018 at 21:21)

 

- Advertisement -

Valuable 3   Must Read 2   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Dave Lindorff is a founding member of the collectively-owned, journalist-run online newspaper www.thiscantbehappening.net. He is a columnist for Counterpunch, is author of several recent books ("This Can't Be Happening! Resisting the (more...)
 

Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon Share Author on Social Media   Go To Commenting

The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.

Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
- Advertisement -

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Israel's Gaza Atrocities Recall America's Atrocities in Vietnam

Supreme Court Junket King Scalia Dies While Vacationing with Wealthy Patrons at Private West Texas Getaway

Something's happening here: Clinton's Crumbling, Bernie's Surging and a 'Political Revolution' May Be in the Offing

Looming climate catastrophe?: A Rapidly Warming Arctic Could Loose a Methane Climate Bomb Causing Extinction in 9 Years

The Case for Impeachment of President Barack Obama

Barack Obama: Manchurian Candidate Version 2.0

Comments

The time limit for entering new comments on this article has expired.

This limit can be removed. Our paid membership program is designed to give you many benefits, such as removing this time limit. To learn more, please click here.

3 people are discussing this page, with 5 comments


PCM

Become a Fan
Author 55357

(Member since Nov 1, 2010), 12 fans, 3 quicklinks, 1165 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

The best thing about this article -- at OpEdnews, at least -- is that it's an incredibly quick read. The worst thing about it is that the entire body of the article is missing.

Version 1: Brevity is the soul of wit.
Version 2: Brevity, wit's soul.
Version 3:

Here's a link to it at War Is A Crime. (It's a pretty quick read there, too. Not as quick as here, but still, quick.)

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:38:47 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Dave Lindorff

Become a Fan
Author 63

(Member since Nov 18, 2005), 82 fans, 1123 articles, 110 quicklinks, 869 comments, 1 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to PCM:   New Content

Ha ha. Very good,


I'm not sure what happened to the piece. Gremlins? NSA censorship?


Anyhow, I've pasted it back in, with a link to the full piece in ThisCantBeHappeing.net


Dave Lindorff

founding editor of ThisCantBeHappening.net

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:25:13 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (1+)
Help
 
IndentIndent

PCM

Become a Fan
Author 55357

(Member since Nov 1, 2010), 12 fans, 3 quicklinks, 1165 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Dave Lindorff:   New Content

Thanks, Dave!

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:43:30 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

Leslie Johnson

Become a Fan
Author 500983
Follow Me on Twitter
(Member since Dec 9, 2014), 11 fans, 1 articles, 436 comments


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


  New Content

More US disinformation to justify its illegal attacks. The very fact that our wars are illegal make 'justification' a non-starter. Illegal is illegal. Wars of aggression have been internationally recognized as illegal since the end of WWII. Why the world hasn't come down on us in self-defense, is beyond me. But then, when the UN wants to condemn us, we just veto the measure. Our country is grossly out of control. It's hard to see our population mobilizing en masse when so many are successfully propagandized.

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:51:25 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 
Indent

Dave Lindorff

Become a Fan
Author 63

(Member since Nov 18, 2005), 82 fans, 1123 articles, 110 quicklinks, 869 comments, 1 diaries


Share on Google Plus Submit to Twitter Add this Page to Facebook! Share on LinkedIn Pin It! Add this Page to Fark! Submit to Reddit Submit to Stumble Upon


Reply to Leslie Johnson:   New Content

And of course, while it routinely supports having national leaders who defy interntional law sent to be tried by the World Court in the Hague, the US itself has never agreed to submit to the jurisdiction of that same World Court.


It would take some daring country to arrest a US leader and put her or him on trial at the Hague, but someday I hope it will happen. Got knows there are enough candidates.


Dave Lindorff

founding editor of ThisCantBeHappening.net

Submitted on Tuesday, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:27:48 PM

Author 0
Add New Comment
Share Comment
Reply To This   Recommend  (0+)
Help
 

 
Want to post your own comment on this Article? Post Comment