Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter 3 Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
General News

Say Pentagon Spending Is Crimping U.S. Job Creation

By       Message Sherwood Ross       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

Supported 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 5/26/12

Author 4140
Become a Fan
  (47 fans)
- Advertisement -

Far from being the best way to create jobs,  the Pentagon's $700-billion war-making budget only retards the nation's job growth, economists say.

"In fact, compared with...alternative uses, spending on the military is a poor source of job creation," write economist Robert Pollin and professor Heidi Garrett-Peltier of the Political Economy Research Institute, Washington, D.C.

Whereas $1 billion of Pentagon spending will generate about 11,200 jobs within the U.S. economy, the same sum would create about 16,800 clean energy jobs, 17,200 healthcare jobs, and 26,700  education jobs, they assert.

- Advertisement -

Those areas will produce between 50 and 140 percent more jobs than the same money spent by the Pentagon, the authors write in the May 28th issue of "The Nation" magazine. Plus, non-"defense"

investments also create larger numbers of decent- to good-quality jobs than the military, as well as many more low-paying jobs, Pollin and Garrett-Peltier argue.

What's more, Pentagon spending wastes taxpayer dollars by frequently skirting  competitive bidding. According to the authors, the Pentagon doles out "noncompetitive, gold-plated, cost-plus contracts to its favorite weapons suppliers such as Lockheed Martin and General Dynamics." "The Defense Department itself reported in 2010 that nearly one-fourth of all service contracts put to competitive bidding had only one bidder," they write.

- Advertisement -

Unfortunately, the economists point out, the military-industrial complex(MIC) "is creating a seriously distorted picture of the effect of military spending cuts on national security and the economy."    They're claiming significant reductions in the military budget would "inflict major damage to the economy. In fact, these claims are demonstrably false."

What Defense Secy. Leon Panetta and others are bewailing as $1 trillion in defense cuts "is actually an annual $100 billion reduction added up over 10 years to produce the huge-sounding $1 trillion figure," Pollin and Garrett-Peltier say.  In reality, the economists write, moving from a $700 billion to $600 billion annual budget "is hardly extreme."

Last year, they note, the Pentagon budget swallowed a whopping 4.7% of the nation's Gross Domestic Product, compared with 3.0% in 2000. During that time, the profits of many defense manufacturers hit all-time, record highs.

The co-authors note the U.S. military budget is more than double the combined spending of China, France, UK, Russia and Germany. Their article is titled, "Benefits of a Slimmer Pentagon."#

(Sherwood Ross formerly reported for the Chicago Daily News and other major dailies and wire services.)

- Advertisement -


- Advertisement -

Supported 2   Must Read 1   Well Said 1  
View Ratings | Rate It

Sherwood Ross worked as a reporter for the Chicago Daily News and contributed a regular "Workplace" column for Reuters. He has contributed to national magazines and hosted a talk show on WOL, Washington, D.C. In the Sixties he was active as public (more...)

Sherwood Ross Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Related Topic(s): ; ; ; , Add Tags
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

U.S. Overthrow in the Ukraine Risks Nuclear War With Russia

Radioactive Ammunition Fired in Middle East May Claim More Lives Than Hiroshima and Nagasaki

Obama Expands the American Warfare State


Is George W. Bush Sane?

Inside America's Biological Warfare Center