Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
OpEdNews Op Eds


By       Message Mary Pitt       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; ; ; ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It Headlined to H3 11/24/10

Author 50
- Advertisement -
Most Americans work hard at their jobs and look forward to getting a paycheck at the end of a period but have little knowledge of the process by which their employers function. They simply work for the business and think of their own income as being the amount on the face of the check and many have no idea of what is or is not purchased with the amounts deducted from their gross pay. Few have any idea of how or whether their employers are paid.

Now, as Congress ponders the end of the tax cuts that President Bush initiated early in his tenure, it is difficult to separate fact from fiction in the arguments for and against that are being presented, particularly in the area of "small business" vs. "corporations."

The Democrats propose to keep the tax cuts for individuals earning less that $250,000 per year while letting those for people earning more to rise to help cover the expenses of salvaging the national economy. In return, the Republicans are demanding that all tax cuts remain in place for the sake of "small business." They tell us that any increase on those with taxable income of a quarter-million dollars a year will "devastate small business and sacrifice jobs."

Don't buy that malarkey! A little knowledge of business, bookkeeping, and ownership will help us wade through all the "bogie-speak" and let us understand what is being considered.

First, the proposed figures would apply to the individual income. That lets out the corporations, whether large or small. It would apply only to privately-owned businesses such as a home-service company that does things like plumbing or appliance repair, some car-repair shops, construction companies, or mom-and-pop neighborhood stores.

- Advertisement -
And the figure applies only to taxable income. That is the amount that the boss has left over after he has paid all the employees, matched their Social Security deductions, paid whatever contribution is necessary for the unemployment insurance, the insurance on the business facility and the equipment, the cost of any materials used or sold in the business, the repairs and utilities necessary to keep that equipment running (the cost of doing business), and any taxes, licenses, etc., that may be imposed on the business by the city, county, or state.

In determining the "taxable" income of the owner, first the gross is computed. This is the total amount collected from the goods or services by the business. In a business that is at all successful, that could be a staggering number! But then, so is the total number of the expenses which must be subtracted from it in order to determine the net profit or loss from the business. If one person owns the business, this will be his or her taxable income. If more than one person owns the business, that figure must be divided between them. In most cases, it will be a whole lot less than a quarter-million!

This knowledge, while simplified, may give one a better understanding of the issue at hand. It does not completely apply in the case of a corporation, beyond the basics, but they are taxed under an entirely different system involving things like "shares," "reinvestment," and other esoteric terms that are not necessary in a discussion of "small business."

- Advertisement -

Why are the right-wing loud-mouths trying to scare us to death about the fair and necessary tax increase on the investor-class to whom George W. Bush handed the keys to the national treasury? Because they are the ones who do not want to pay their fair share! I hope the debate makes more sense once you truly understand the subject that is being discussed. As currently planned, the same bill that will increase the tax burden on the really-well-off will also carry an extension of the cuts for the low-income and a reduction for the middle class.

That is you, so get out there and support it! When opponents strut around like pretentious hens, crying "Cut! Cut! Cut! Barack!" you will know that they are full of "Cockle-Doo-Doo, too!"

It is trite, but true, that the reason we must "tax the rich" is because the poor have no money.


- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

This writer is eighty years old and has spent a half century working with handicapped and deprived people and advocating on their behalf while caring for her own workung-class family. She spends her "Sunset Years" in writing and struggling with The (more...)

Mary Pitt Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)


The Naked Truth About Rape

Sarah Palin Simply Does Not Matter

Revolt of the Grannies!

The Truth about Your Income Tax