Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on LinkedIn Share on Reddit Tell A Friend Printer Friendly Page Save As Favorite View Favorites
General News

SCOTUS Should Find Okla. Execution Drug Protocol Unconstitutional, Say Anesthesiologist and Law Prof

By       Message Jose Cornejo       (Page 1 of 1 pages)     Permalink    (# of views)   No comments

Related Topic(s): ; , Add Tags
Add to My Group(s)

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Author 89680
- Advertisement -

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Glossip v. Gross, a case challenging whether the drug midazolam is suitable for use in lethal injection executions. Glossip, which examines Oklahoma's lethal injection protocol, marks the "second time in seven years that the Court has reviewed a three-drug, lethal injection procedure," the last case being Baze v. Rees(2008).

What makes this three-drug cocktail different from the one the Court reviewed before? Today in The New Republic, an anesthesiologist and law professor provide clarity.

Dr. David Waisel, a professor at Harvard Medical School, and Paul Litton, a professor at the University of Missouri Law School, explain how the protocols differ, and why it matters:

The significant difference between the procedure approved by the Court in Baze and the protocol currently facing scrutiny is the first drug. In the old procedure, Kentucky first administered a barbiturate, sodium thiopental, to produce a "deep comalike unconsciousness," thereby preventing the terror and extreme pain that would otherwise be caused by the subsequent drugs. Barbiturates, when used correctly, induce a deep general anesthesia in which patients do not feel pain. The Court in Baze acknowledged that, without a "proper dose of [the barbiturate] that would render the prisoner unconscious," the protocol would be unconstitutional. But the Court found that Kentucky's procedure included adequate safeguards to ensure delivery of a proper dose of the sodium thiopental and therefore upheld the procedure.
And how the substitution of midazolam for the first drug renders Oklahoma's drug protocol unconstitutional:
Midazolam is a benzodiazepine drug. Its primary clinical use is to provide anxiolysis, amnesia, and sedation. It is not used clinically to induce the type of deep, general anesthesia needed to withstand painful stimuli, and we have good reason to doubt that midazolam, regardless of the size of the dose administered, can reliably produce the "deep comalike unconsciousness" that is necessary to prevent the unconstitutional pain and suffering caused by the potassium chloride in a three-drug lethal injection execution.
The pair ends the piece with an important and often overlooked point: lethal injection is distinct from the death penalty issue--wherever you stand on the death penalty, midazolam, which has been used in several botched executions in the past year, simply doesn't work like it's supposed to in lethal injection executions:
Whether it is rational or ethical to have capital punishment is a question for a different day. Permitting preordained, unnecessary, and excruciating pain and suffering--based on the use of a drug that cannot perform as needed to protect against the harm that the next two drugs unquestionably will cause--assaults prisoners' dignity and demeans us all. It's also unconstitutional.

 

- Advertisement -

View Ratings | Rate It

opednews.com

Jose Cornejo is a recent graduate from the University of Wisconsin.

Jose Cornejo Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Why states could be botching executions we'll never know about

Former Attorneys General: Oklahoma's Lethal Injection Process Flawed

Law Profs: SCOTUS Should Focus on Risky Execution Drug, Not Activists

SCOTUS Should Find Okla. Execution Drug Protocol Unconstitutional, Say Anesthesiologist and Law Prof

Pharmacologist: Oklahoma Can't Square Its Lethal Injection Protocol with Science

New Report Regarding Use of Midazolam for Executionst: Oklahoma Misleads the Supreme Court