Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 61 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
General News    H3'ed 2/5/13

S&P Lawsuit: Floyd Abrams' Bogus Insinuations Against The Justice Department

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)   1 comment, In Series: Credit Rating Agencies
Message David Fiderer

After the Justice Department released its complaint against Standard & Poor's, the rating agency's lead attorney, Floyd Abrams, threw sand in the faces of CNBC's viewers. He made a bogus insinuation that the lawsuit was payback for S&P's downgrade of US sovereign debt on August 6, 2011.

"Is it true that after the downgrade the intensity of this investigation significantly increased? Yea," he said to David Faber. "We don't know why." He, "doesn't think anyone knows" whether the lawsuit was launched as a form of retaliation for the downgrade.

I know why the investigation ramped up when it did. And so should anyone else who has been following this story. Floyd Abrams' insinuation about the government's motivations are like Donald Trump's insinuation regarding Obama's both certificate, a passive aggressive smear.

The chronology goes like this:

May 2011: Sen. Carl Levin, whose Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations conducted and exhaustive probe of the rating agencies, makes a referral to the Justice Department.

May through August 2011: The Justice Department examines evidence provided by the Permanent Subcommittee and the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission. Given the enormity of the evidence and exhibits (not all of which were publicly released), it would take any law office a while in order to determine how to move forward.

August 18, 2011: Twelve days after the S&P downgrade of US sovereign debt, Bloomberg reports that the Justice Department had interviewed three former rating agency employees in July.

Or you might take the other perspective, and say that I don't know for sure when and how  the Justice Department ramped up its investigation. But the exact same thing could be said of Floyd Abrams. The Justice Department doesn't reveal all that is going on inside of the agency during an ongoing investigation; he would only know the tip of the iceberg.

But Abrams was very adept at launching a bogus media narrative.

Interesting 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

David Fiderer Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

For over 20 years, David has been a banker covering the energy industry for several global banks in New York. Currently, he is working on several journalism projects dealing with corporate and political corruption that, so far, have escaped serious (more...)
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Fatal Flaws In The Lawsuit Against Fannie Mae Execs, Part 2

Fannie Mae "Accounting Scandal" Discredited In Court

Mortgages, Ed Pinto, And A Vast Conspiracy Of Silence

How Niall Ferguson Invented False Quotes By Paul Krugman

How Paulson's People Colluded With Goldman to Destroy AIG And Get A Backdoor Bailout

Fox News Embraces Cyber-Terrorism to Subvert the Copenhagen Summit

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend