Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 31 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Exclusive to OpEd News:
OpEdNews Op Eds    H4'ed 11/24/20

Russia in Nagorno-Karabakh

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment

Fighting went on for quite some time in Nagorno-Karabakh, and for quite some time Russia looked confused and uncertain. Perhaps this was a false assumption because Russia once again was able to achieve what it wanted - maintaining good relations, at least officially, with both Armenia and Azerbaijan.

How was this possible - only those who participated can answer this question. I am sure that everyone had their own motives, but Azerbaijan is the one who lost the most. Of course, the most important thing was to stop the war, but it is highly unlikely that this was Russia's actual goal.

So, how did the events unfold in general terms? On 27 September 2020, an armed conflict began. Several ceasefires were reached but all of them were violated without hesitation. Russia announced that it will engage only when Azerbaijan begins threatening Armenia. I will remind you that Armenia is part of the CSTO.

On 10 November 2020, a complete ceasefire was agreed mediated by Russia. The terms of the ceasefire intend that Azerbaijan will keep all the territories it liberated, including the region's second largest city Shusha. In addition, Armenia has until 1 December to give up control over several other territories. Russian peacekeepers will remain in Nagorno-Karabakh for at least five years and will be located along the line of contact separating the Armenian and Azerbaijani forces and the Lachin corridor that connects Nagorno-Karabakh and Armenia.1

Everything would seem fine, except the peculiar incident that took place the day before - on 9 November, a Russian Mi-24 helicopter was downed over Armenia not far from the Nagorno-Karabakh border. Media reported that the aircraft was escorting a column of forces from a Russian military base when it was shot down using a man-portable surface-to-air missile (SAM) system.2 Azerbaijan was quick to announce that the helicopter was downed by mistake.

The events that followed unfolded as in the best Hollywood movies - Azerbaijan apologized for its actions, and Putin accepted this apology. Two criminal cases were launched in both Azerbaijan and Russia - the first for negligence during service and the second for violating flight safety requirements. The mistake had allegedly occurred due to several reasons.

Everything sounds delightful, however there are several BUTS.

In such cases, the location where the aircraft was downed would usually be disclosed, but this time it didn't happen. It was only revealed that it took place over Armenian territory. Why is this important? Quite simple - the helicopter was shot down with a man-portable SAM system, and the range of such a SAM system, regardless of the manufacturer, is 6,000 meters.

Let's keep in mind that this happened at night. Those who have visited Armenia and Azerbaijan know that these are mountainous countries, meaning it would be impossible to exploit the maximum range even during the day. And we just happen to be in a situation where no outsider will be able to confirm or deny what really happened. As they say - only lies need to be kept secret.

Next, did no one bother to ask what was a Russian forces column - as some media outlets pointed out, from the Russian 102nd Military Base in Gyumri (Armenia) which is on the other side of Armenia - doing so close to the borders of Armenia and Azerbaijan? To be exact, there are about 170 kilometers from the said base to the nearest Azerbaijani border.

It's not enough that a military column of a foreign state was moving freely inside another country near the borders of yet another country, they were actually very close if we consider the range of man-portable SAM system, and the road led in only one direction - Azerbaijan. What were Russian army units doing there? And the column most definitely didn't consist of one or two vehicles because air support was present.

Lastly, if the helicopter was downed in the airspace of Armenia, shouldn't it be considered an attack against Armenia, not to mention an attack against a Russian aircraft? Even more so because the CSTO has an article stipulating that an attack against one member state is an attack against all member states. On a side note - if Azerbaijan apologized to Russia, why didn't it see it necessary to apologize to Armenia?

We have a lot to think about. What will follow is only an assumption but - based on what I already wrote - a highly probable one.

Azerbaijan and its army were wrecking Armenia in Nagorno-Karabakh. The Armenians did very badly, to put it mildly, and neither Russian armaments, nor Russia itself - being Armenia's ally and CSTO partner - weren't able to save them.

While Azerbaijan did quite well - it had better armaments, and its ally Turkey turned out to be an ally in reality as well.

However, Russia wanted to both maintain its influence and present itself as the global savior of a conflict it itself had accelerated and one that allowed Russia to sell weapons to both sides. It's undeniably a difficult task to achieve, but it is well known that Russia has perfected the art of provocation.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Zintis Znotiņš Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

On a daily basis I am working as freelance independent investigative journalist. I am happy to be the Latvian patriot, born in Riga. I Have studied politics and journalism at the Latvian University. Currently, on a voluntary basis, I am helping (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Putin and his schizophrenia

Is Lukashenko a liar, a fool - or both?

Kremlin: Russians don't deserve Sputnik-V

Russia's loud statements of its military might are nothing but fabrication

China Is Slowly But Surely Taking Over The World

Lukashenko's days are numbered, and so could be Putin's

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend