Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 18 Share on Twitter 2 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H3'ed 5/28/12

Rupert Watch, Tony Blair Lying at the Leveson Inquiry

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment, In Series: Murdoch press scandals
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Michael Collins
Become a Fan
  (120 fans)

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA
(Washington, 5/28/2012) Former British Prime Minister Tony Blair testified before the Leveson Inquiry today. He retains that familiar fatuous exuberance for failed policies and continues to deny the deadly lies he told in over a decade as Prime Minister. He was, as always, quite literally unbearable.(Image: Niecieden)

President George W. Bush had major problems selling his disastrous invasion plans for Iraq. The public smelled a rat. Strong majorities of both Democrats and Republicans opposed a preemptive invasion without confirmation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) by UN inspectors. That was during December 2002 and January 2003. Bush needed something special to push his diabolic plan over the top.

Blair's government released two fraudulent intelligence papers during the critical period just before the March 2003 Iraq invasion, the September 2002 report and the Iraq or Dodgy Dossier in early February 2003. Rupert Murdoch's media cartel led the charge for war. He headlined stories about both bogus reports including the outrageous claim that Iraq could launch chemical weapons at the invaders within 45 minutes of an attack and the big lie about Iraq seeking uranium from Niger to develop nuclear weapons.

Blair and Murdoch worked together to provide Bush with the credibility to tell the most disastrous lie ever told by a president:

"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." George W. Bush, State of the Union, January 29, 2003

Tony Blair is guilty of the very same crimes as Bush: murder, assault, and fraud by lying to the people to justify a preemptive attack that resulted in deaths and injuries, traumas and displacements, with a total cost that has helped ruin the U.S. economy - $3.0 trillion. Rupert Murdoch and his minions share that guilt as the public relations shop for the road to perdition.

This is the true context for Blair's testimony before the Leveson Inquiry on "The relationship between press and politicians."

Blair Testifies at Leveson

During the morning hearing, Blair was questioned by Queen's Counsel (QC) Robert Jay who carefully laid the foundation for key questions.  Blair also began laying his own foundation, a staccato mantra of answers to questions not asked.

Blair emphasized the rationale for his overall media policy on at least three, perhaps more, occasions.  He had no objection to foreign ownership (read Murdoch) of British media properties.  He was inclined to be a free marketer on media and thus not in favor of tight regulation.  Blair argued that the "culture and rules under which people play" were the most important factors in a positive media policy.

The former Prime Minister repeated several times that he was unwilling to risk the New Labour agenda over a fight to tighten the Communications Act given the relentless attacks he could anticipate from the tabloid press.

Jay raised questions about the period between September 15, 1994 and May 1, 1997.  The QC referenced a private meeting that Blair had Murdoch lobbyist Gus Fisher in 1994.  Blair was clear that a Labour government would not have major concerns regarding cross-media ownership (e.g., television, newspapers, etc.).  QC Jay also pointed to the extraordinary effort Blair made to attend and speak at a News Corp conference in Australia.  Blair presented the meeting with his overall views on media ownership.  Jay asked Blair if the meeting was used to "curry favor" with Murdoch.  Blair demurred and then denied that this was the case.

Jay inquired about three calls Blair took from Rupert Murdoch just before the Iraq invasion on March 11, 13, and 19.  What were he and Murdoch talking about, the counsel wondered?  Blair said that this was "normal" when facing such a big issue (normal talking to Murdoch?).  He also noted that Murdoch had as good a read on "what was going on in the United States" as any expert he'd asked.

QC Jay then asked if there was any connection between the call with Murdoch on March 13 and the incredibly vicious personal attacks on French President Jacque Chirac the next day in Murdoch's Sun newspaper.  Chirac had refused to become part of the coalition of the willing to invade Iraq.  There were rumors that Chirac was considering a UN Security Council veto of the vote that could be construed as legitimizing war.  Blair denied any part in encouraging or even knowing of the Murdoch hatchet job.

(Image by Unknown Owner)   Details   DMCA

Just before the lunch break, a man burst through the door behind Lord Justice Leveson, grabbed the judge's table, and began shouting that Blair committed a war crime by helping JP Morgan steal $20 billion from the Bank of Iraq three months after the invasion.  As the man was hauled out through the same hallway, he shouted, "The man is a war criminal."  This was the most direct expression of truth so far in the Leveson Inquiry. (Blair has been a consultant for JPMorgan since leaving office.)

Leveson was very upset, as well he should have been, and called for an investigation of the security lapse.

The hearing paused for lunch and resumed with Jay continuing unflustered with questions. . While Jay appeared to show no reaction to the intrusion and seemed ready to go the distance with Blair, Leveson was shaken and ended the hearing an hour early.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

Rate It | View Ratings

Michael Collins Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines

Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEd News Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Ukraine President Once Agent for U.S. State Department

Worst President Ever - Barack H. Obama

It's official! You're on your own

Rigged Elections for Romney?

Real Unemployment at 23% - Dampening the Excitement

Humiliation And Death As A Tool Of National Policy

To View Comments or Join the Conversation:

Tell A Friend