Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 1 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds    H2'ed 1/20/13

Robert's Rules Of Disorder (Stop The Filibuster, Part 4)

By       (Page 1 of 1 pages)
(# of views)   No comments
Author 24
Message The Pen

(Article changed on January 20, 2013 at 12:48)

Robert's Rules of Disorder
Robert's Rules of Disorder
(Image by The Pen)
  Details   DMCA

This is the fourth installment of our mini-series, "How The Filibuster Happened By Accident," titled "Robert's Rules Of Disorder."

Stop The Filibuster action page:http://www.peaceteam.net/action/pnum1104.php

In the first three parts we reviewed how the founding fathers would never have agreed to a procedure requiring a supermajority to pass basic legislation (absent a presidential veto) or approve appointments. The first actual filibuster was not until at least 1837, and was immediately held in foul disrepute, and act of constitutional piracy.

Some may think that because Robert's so-called Rules of Order include a procedure that resembles an attempted cloture vote (to cut off a filibuster) that this was some time honored tradition from the same era as our Constitution. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Henry Martyn Robert was not one of our founding fathers. He was not even born until 1837, about the time filibusters were getting started. Robert was just a guy, an army colonel actually, who took it on himself in 1876, a hundred years after the Constitution, to put together a generic book of parliamentary procedures, for use by organizations NOT the government.

It is said that Robert imitated in part procedures in the House of Representatives at the time. If so, he just invented himself the idea of requiring a 2/3 vote to cut off debate, because unlike the Senate, the House at that time still maintained the procedure to "call the question" (and cut off debate) based on a simple majority vote. The Senate had no cloture rule at all at the time.

It was not until 1917 that the Senate finally acted to try to rein in filibuster abuse. President Wilson had proposed allowing merchant ships to arm themselves to protect against war time attacks on the high seas. Members of one party (we'll let you guess which one, it starts with "R" and ends with "Republican") filibustered for 23 days, while people burned them in effigy in the streets.

Finally, a cloture rule was negotiated, providing for a 2/3 vote to cut off debate, an unhappy coincidence with the Robert's generic procedure for small society actions, Robert's Rules of Disorder for running an actual government. But the key point is this. The only reason even that that compromise was possible was because the threat was to eliminate the filibuster entirely. It should have been done then. It must be done now. And the only way any positive change will happen is if that is what we are demanding.

Tomorrow, the fifth and final part in this series, "Unblocking The Pipe". 

 

Rate It | View Ratings

The Pen Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

The Pen is a real person, and the creator of UTalk, a revolutionary new internet radio interface, to make advocacy messages as facile and easy as possible. With this goal in mind we pioneered one click action pages in the political realm, now (more...)
 

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

The Democratic Party's Plan To THROW The Next Couple Elections

They've Literally Punched A Hole Into Hell, We Need A Crash Alternative Energy Program Now, Assuming We Even Survive

If You Are Not Angry About The Democratic Platform TPP Scam You Are Not Paying Attention

A Supreme Act Of Judicial Treason Against The People Of The United States, And What We Can And Must Do About It

Obama's New "Improved" Leech Therapy

The President Can And Must Invoke 31 USC 3102 To Pay Our National Debts

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: