Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 13 Share on Twitter 1 Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
Life Arts    H2'ed 7/1/10

Rabbi Michael Lerner on the Recent Network of Spiritual Progressives Conference

By       (Page 1 of 3 pages)   10 comments
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Follow Me on Twitter     Message Joan Brunwasser
Become a Fan
  (89 fans)

You just wrapped up a conference of The Network of Spiritual Progressives earlier this month in DC that I attended. What were you hoping to accomplish meeting at this particular moment in time?

We had hoped to refine a strategy for secular and spiritual progressives for the coming Obama years--a strategy that would help push the Obama Administration in a more progressive direction and yet simultaneously NOT give the Right or the Tea Party fanatics any leverage to further weaken Obama. This is the particular challenge of the Obama years: we believe that his abandonment of a visionary and transformative politics, hopes for which he awakened and used to get elected in 2008 and then subsequently dashed with his actual policies in the past 18 months, has created the space for a deep disillusionment into which the Tea Party people were able to opportunistically step.

So we think that the best way for Obama to have greater chance as President is to return to a program that could make people feel that the reasons they voted for him have been justified. That speaks for pushing him to a more progressive program. Yet we also know that if Obama is weakened, his replacement will not be with a more progressive force but a more reactionary one, so we have to balance our approach in ways that do not further open the door to the quasi-fascist forces that have done everything possible to destroy his presidency and prevent any successes of any sort.

So, how did your understanding of current political realities translate into what actually transpired at the conference?

The most significant factor crippling liberal and progressive forces today is their willingness to accept the notion that we must frame our political agenda in terms of what the media, the political elite, and the captains of industry and finance tell us is "realistic." One of the main reasons that we have not been able to muster demonstrations of millions of people in the streets to challenge the war in Afghanistan, to demand government price controls on health care or a massive program to end unemployment or to insist that we stop offshore oil drilling in light of the Gulf oil disaster is that we are told that the Democrats in Congress and the President are acting like wet noodles only because they are being "realistic." So the central message we tried to convey in our gathering was that it's time to demand that those who claim to represent us stop being realistic and start fighting for the ideals that we sent them to Washington to support.

The most significant changes in the US in the past fifty years were won because people fought for ideals that were universally seen as "unrealistic" when their struggles began--the struggle against segregation and for civil rights for minorities, the struggle against patriarchy and discrimination against women, the struggle for glbt rights, the struggle for rights of the disabled, all of these struggles were dismissed as "unrealistic." Over and over again people have been told that "politics is the art of the possible" and therefore they should give up their highest vision of the good and fight for what is "realistic." But history actually teaches a different message: that you never know what is possible until you fight for what is desirable, because in that struggle many desirable goals that seemed impossible begin to appear to be quite possible as more and more people struggle to achieve a more humane and ethically and spiritually rational world.

The NSP conference was filled with people who know what America should look like and are working to achieve that vision, not waiting around for those in power. This kind of activism is very empowering. Despite the deep disappointment with this administration and acknowledgment of the many very serious problems we're facing,there was tremendous energy generated over those three days. Are all of your conferences like that?

Yes, they are. The reason is that we trust the intelligence of our members very much, so we ask our speakers to talk to us as though we were colleagues trying to figure out the difficult questions, rather than as an audience at a big rally that needs to be energized into supporting what everyone already supports else they wouldn't have been there. And we pick the smartest thinkers on each topic. And then we have small group discussions to make sure that everyone gets a real chance to express themselves. Finally, we are not afraid to talk about love, caring for each other, and a spirit of generosity and compassion that we ask people to bring with them and show towards others. When you put all those together in a context with lots of singing and dancing in the aisles, you get a really high conference!

I can attest to that! When's the next conference? And how do you keep that connection strong between conferences?

Next Page  1  |  2  |  3

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).


Must Read 2   Inspiring 2   Well Said 1  
Rate It | View Ratings

Joan Brunwasser Social Media Pages: Facebook page url on login Profile not filled in       Twitter page url on login Profile not filled in       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram page url on login Profile not filled in

Joan Brunwasser is a co-founder of Citizens for Election Reform (CER) which since 2005 existed for the sole purpose of raising the public awareness of the critical need for election reform. Our goal: to restore fair, accurate, transparent, secure elections where votes are cast in private and counted in public. Because the problems with electronic (computerized) voting systems include a lack of (more...)

Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Follow Me on Twitter     Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
   (Opens new browser window)

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

Interview with Dr. Margaret Flowers, Arrested Tuesday at Senate Roundtable on Health Care

Renowned Stanford Psychologist Carol Dweck on "Mindset: The New Psychology of Success"

Howard Zinn on "The People Speak," the Supreme Court and Haiti

Snopes confirms danger of Straight Ticket Voting (STV)

Fed Up With Corporate Tax Dodgers? Check Out!

Literary Agent Shares Trade Secrets With New Writers

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: