Send a Tweet
Most Popular Choices
Share on Facebook 16 Share on Twitter Printer Friendly Page More Sharing
OpEdNews Op Eds   

R.I.P. RBG - Medical Freedom and Environmental Champion

By       (Page 1 of 2 pages)   1 comment
Become a Premium Member Would you like to know how many people have read this article? Or how reputable the author is? Simply sign up for a Advocate premium membership and you'll automatically see this data on every article. Plus a lot more, too.
Author 517986
Message Children's Health Defense
Become a Fan
  (5 fans)

This piece was reprinted by OpEdNews with permission or license. It may not be reproduced in any form without permission or license from the source.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
(Image by Children's Health Defense)
  Details   DMCA

Ruth Bader Ginsburg's death robs vaccine safety advocates of one of their SCOTUS champions. The other is Sonia Sotomayor. In 2015, RBG joined Sotomayor in a withering dissent of Judge Scalia's historic decision in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth. Scalia and his corporatist brethren interpreted the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) to shield Big Pharma with full immunity from liability for vaccine injuries. Their decision removed all incentives for pharmaceutical corporations to make vaccines safe, and Americans forfeited their seventh amendment right to jury trial against vaccine companies that harmed them, no matter how negligent.

RBG and Sotomayor said that Scalia's opinion caused "considerable violence to the statutory texts, misconstrued the legislative history and draws all the wrong conclusions" from NCVIA.

Congress, the lady justices observed, intended to exempt vaccine manufacturers from tort liability "only upon a showing by the manufacturer in each case that the vaccine was properly manufactured and labeled, and that the side effects stemming from the vaccine's design could not have been prevented by a feasible alternative design that would have eliminated the adverse side effects.""

They pointed out that tort suits, including discovery, were the only force incentivizing drug companies to make vaccines safe. They said, "Tort suits uncover unknown drug hazards and provide incentives for drug manufacturers to disclose safety risks promptly."

By construing the Vaccine Injury Compensation Act to pre-empt all design defect claims, "the majority's decision leaves a regulatory vacuum in which no one neither the FDA nor any other federal agency, nor state and federal juries" ensures vaccine safety. "There is no reason" they added "to think that Congress intended in the vaccine context to eliminate the traditional incentive and deterrence functions served by " tort liability". Nothing in the text, structure, or legislative history remotely suggests that Congress intended that result."

Scalia's decision made vaccines immensely profitable and gave blanket immunity to the 72 mandated doses of unnecessary, untested, risky, zero liability vaccines now on the mandatory schedule.

Justice Ginsburg was a champion for safe vaccines, and, or course, for women's rights, and gender equality, but she was also an environmental crusader.

Ginsburg consistently voted in favor of saving the Clean Water Act from industry efforts to weaken and restrict its reach.

In 2001, she joined a scathing dissent in Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County v. United States, in which the majority ruled that isolated ponds and wetlands are beyond federal jurisdiction. In 2006, the court's splintered 4-1-4 decision Rapanos v. United States, Ginsburg joined justice John Paul Stevens in arguing for expansive federal jurisdiction over virtually all waterways.

In April, she was part of a six-justice majority that ruled pollution that travels into waterways via groundwater can be subject to the Clean Water Act.

Ginsburg was the supreme court's leading warrior in defending government's authority to protect our climate.

In 2001, she joined a unanimous court in ruling that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) cannot consider implementation costs when setting national air quality limits for smog and other toxic pollutants. It is one of the high court's most important environmental rulings, and those EPA regulations particularly have improved millions of lives.

Ginsberg also took the lead on defending the government's power to regulate air pollution and climate altering chemicals.

Six years ago, Ginsburg led a 6-2 majority that upheld an Obama rule limiting air pollution that crosses state lines, preserving the rule that shuttered some of the nation's dirtiest power plants.

Ginsburg was part of the five-justice majority in the high court's landmark ruling on climate change, 2007's Massachusetts v. EPA, holding that the Clean Air Act gave EPA the authority to regulate greenhouse gases from cars and trucks.

Next Page  1  |  2

(Note: You can view every article as one long page if you sign up as an Advocate Member, or higher).

 

Rate It | View Ratings

Children's Health Defense Social Media Pages: Facebook Page       Twitter Page       Linkedin page url on login Profile not filled in       Instagram Page


The Children's Health Defense Team is devoted to the health of people and our planet.  Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children's Health Defense.

(more...)
 
Go To Commenting
The views expressed herein are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of this website or its editors.
Writers Guidelines
Contact AuthorContact Author Contact EditorContact Editor Author PageView Authors' Articles
Support OpEdNews

OpEdNews depends upon can't survive without your help.

If you value this article and the work of OpEdNews, please either Donate or Purchase a premium membership.

STAY IN THE KNOW
If you've enjoyed this, sign up for our daily or weekly newsletter to get lots of great progressive content.
Daily Weekly     OpEdNews Newsletter
Name
Email
   (Opens new browser window)
 

Most Popular Articles by this Author:     (View All Most Popular Articles by this Author)

World Economic Forum's 'Great Reset' Plan for Big Food Benefits Industry, Not People

Press in His Pocket: Bill Gates Buys Media to Control the Messaging

Yes, Bill Gates Said That. Here's the Proof.

Big Food Uses Front Groups to Influence Public Health Policy

The Persuasion Game: Manipulating Intention to Get a Covid-19 Vaccine

Number of Injuries Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Climbs by Nearly 4,000 in One Week

To View Comments or Join the Conversation: